Critical mineral mining in the energy transition: A systematic review of environmental, social, and governance risks and opportunities

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103672
{"title":"Critical mineral mining in the energy transition: A systematic review of environmental, social, and governance risks and opportunities","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To address climate change, countries must decarbonize and shift to renewable energy. Renewables like solar and wind are mineral intensive, meaning the world must rapidly scale up mining and processing of critical minerals such as lithium and cobalt. Such an energy transition offers economic opportunities, but poses serious environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks. Scholars have begun to identify these risks and opportunities, yet no systematic synthesis exists. Further, non-legal academic literature on this topic frequently fails to engage a growing legal scholarship. We reviewed 69 articles focusing on critical mineral mining in the context of energy transition to describe the state of the literature and synthesize information on ESG risks and opportunities. We drew on non-legal and legal scholarship, making this the first systematic review on this topic to unite both literatures. We find that 60 % of papers focus on two minerals – lithium and/or cobalt – leaving other vitally important critical minerals unexplored. There are also glaring geographic holes – for example, the lithium papers focus on South America's Lithium Triangle, largely missing top producer Australia and other players. Collectively, the articles identify 26 ESG factors, comprising 18 risks and 8 opportunities. While this review provides a strong synthesis of existing scholarship, it reveals a clear gap between what we know and what is needed to accelerate global energy transition. There is pressing need for scholarship on overlooked critical minerals and regions, ESG opportunities in addition to risks, ownership models, and governance solutions such as impact benefit agreements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To address climate change, countries must decarbonize and shift to renewable energy. Renewables like solar and wind are mineral intensive, meaning the world must rapidly scale up mining and processing of critical minerals such as lithium and cobalt. Such an energy transition offers economic opportunities, but poses serious environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks. Scholars have begun to identify these risks and opportunities, yet no systematic synthesis exists. Further, non-legal academic literature on this topic frequently fails to engage a growing legal scholarship. We reviewed 69 articles focusing on critical mineral mining in the context of energy transition to describe the state of the literature and synthesize information on ESG risks and opportunities. We drew on non-legal and legal scholarship, making this the first systematic review on this topic to unite both literatures. We find that 60 % of papers focus on two minerals – lithium and/or cobalt – leaving other vitally important critical minerals unexplored. There are also glaring geographic holes – for example, the lithium papers focus on South America's Lithium Triangle, largely missing top producer Australia and other players. Collectively, the articles identify 26 ESG factors, comprising 18 risks and 8 opportunities. While this review provides a strong synthesis of existing scholarship, it reveals a clear gap between what we know and what is needed to accelerate global energy transition. There is pressing need for scholarship on overlooked critical minerals and regions, ESG opportunities in addition to risks, ownership models, and governance solutions such as impact benefit agreements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能源转型中的关键矿产开采:对环境、社会和治理风险与机遇的系统审查
为应对气候变化,各国必须去碳化并转向可再生能源。太阳能和风能等可再生能源属于矿产密集型能源,这意味着全球必须迅速扩大锂和钴等关键矿产的开采和加工规模。这种能源转型提供了经济机遇,但也带来了严重的环境、社会和治理(ESG)风险。学者们已经开始识别这些风险和机遇,但还没有系统的综述。此外,有关该主题的非法律学术文献往往未能涉及日益增长的法律学术研究。我们回顾了 69 篇关注能源转型背景下关键矿产开采的文章,以描述文献现状并综合有关环境、社会和治理风险与机遇的信息。我们借鉴了非法律和法律方面的学术成果,这是首次对这一主题进行系统性综述,将这两种学术成果结合在一起。我们发现,60% 的论文关注两种矿产--锂和/或钴--而其他极其重要的关键矿产却未被探讨。此外,还存在明显的地理漏洞--例如,有关锂的论文主要集中在南美洲的锂三角地区,而忽略了最大的生产国澳大利亚和其他国家。总的来说,这些文章确定了 26 个环境、社会和公司治理因素,包括 18 个风险和 8 个机遇。虽然这篇综述对现有的学术研究进行了有力的总结,但它揭示了我们所了解的情况与加快全球能源转型所需的情况之间存在着明显的差距。我们迫切需要关于被忽视的关键矿产和地区、除风险外的环境、社会和公司治理机遇、所有权模式和治理解决方案(如影响收益协议)的学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Juggling the basics: How much does an income increase affect energy spending of low-income households in England? The informality-energy innovation-finance nexus: Sustainable business models for microgrid-based off-grid urban energy access The future of fossil fuels, chemicals, and feedstocks: Outlining a research agenda on the role of China in the global petrochemical industry Green hydrogen transitions deepen socioecological risks and extractivist patterns: evidence from 28 prospective exporting countries in the Global South Unpacking travel needs and experiences: Insights from qualitative interviews with affordable housing residents in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1