Can manure application method and timing with cover crops reduce NH3 and N2O gas losses and sustain corn yield?

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agronomy Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1002/agj2.21644
Sailesh Sigdel, Curtis J. Dell, Heather D. Karsten
{"title":"Can manure application method and timing with cover crops reduce NH3 and N2O gas losses and sustain corn yield?","authors":"Sailesh Sigdel,&nbsp;Curtis J. Dell,&nbsp;Heather D. Karsten","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) loss following manure application is an environmental concern and N loss for crop production. Manure injection typically reduces NH<sub>3</sub> loss compared to surface application without incorporation but increases emissions of nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), which is a potent greenhouse gas. Synchronizing manure in spring with cover crop (CC) growth may increase N recovery and reduce N<sub>2</sub>O emissions compared to applying manure later in the absence of growing crops. We compared the two following manure application methods: shallow-disk injection (IM) or surface banding without incorporation (BM) to annual ryegrass (<i>Lolium multiflorum</i> L.) and red clover (<i>Trifolium pratense</i> L.) CC at two times: early spring on growing CC (EARLY) and late spring on terminated CC (LATE). The randomized split-plot block experiment was conducted at Rock Springs, PA, during 2021–2022. After manure application, we measured NH<sub>3</sub> for 72 h and N<sub>2</sub>O throughout the growing season. Aboveground CC biomass, N, and C:N ratio; pre-sidedress soil nitrate; corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) stalk nitrate; and silage yield were assessed. Averaged across application times, compared to BM, IM reduced cumulative NH<sub>3</sub> loss, increased soil N, and resulted in 13% greater corn yield but increased yield-scaled N<sub>2</sub>O. Compared to BM LATE, BM EARLY reduced NH<sub>3</sub> loss by 43%, increased CC N, reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emission by 50%, but decreased corn yield by 11%. When IM was EARLY compared to LATE, CC N increased 84%, cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O loss decreased 55%, and corn yield was similar. Injecting manure to growing CCs offers a strategy for reducing detrimental NH<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and maintaining corn yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21644","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ammonia (NH3) loss following manure application is an environmental concern and N loss for crop production. Manure injection typically reduces NH3 loss compared to surface application without incorporation but increases emissions of nitrous oxide (N2O), which is a potent greenhouse gas. Synchronizing manure in spring with cover crop (CC) growth may increase N recovery and reduce N2O emissions compared to applying manure later in the absence of growing crops. We compared the two following manure application methods: shallow-disk injection (IM) or surface banding without incorporation (BM) to annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) and red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) CC at two times: early spring on growing CC (EARLY) and late spring on terminated CC (LATE). The randomized split-plot block experiment was conducted at Rock Springs, PA, during 2021–2022. After manure application, we measured NH3 for 72 h and N2O throughout the growing season. Aboveground CC biomass, N, and C:N ratio; pre-sidedress soil nitrate; corn (Zea mays L.) stalk nitrate; and silage yield were assessed. Averaged across application times, compared to BM, IM reduced cumulative NH3 loss, increased soil N, and resulted in 13% greater corn yield but increased yield-scaled N2O. Compared to BM LATE, BM EARLY reduced NH3 loss by 43%, increased CC N, reduced N2O emission by 50%, but decreased corn yield by 11%. When IM was EARLY compared to LATE, CC N increased 84%, cumulative N2O loss decreased 55%, and corn yield was similar. Injecting manure to growing CCs offers a strategy for reducing detrimental NH3 and N2O emissions and maintaining corn yield.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粪肥施用方法和时间搭配覆盖作物能否减少 NH3 和 N2O 气体损失并维持玉米产量?
施肥后的氨氮(NH3)损失是一个环境问题,也是作物生产的氮损失。与不进行掺混的地表施肥相比,注入粪肥通常可减少 NH3 损失,但会增加一氧化二氮(N2O)的排放,而一氧化二氮是一种强效温室气体。与在没有作物生长的情况下较晚施用粪肥相比,在春季将粪肥与覆盖作物(CC)生长同步施用可提高氮的回收率并减少氧化亚氮的排放。我们对以下两种粪肥施用方法进行了比较:在一年生黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum L.)和红三叶(Trifolium pratense L.)CC 上进行浅盘喷施(IM)或表面带状施肥(BM),施肥时间有两个:早春施用在生长中的 CC 上(EARLY)和晚春施用在终止生长的 CC 上(LATE)。该随机小区试验于 2021-2022 年期间在宾夕法尼亚州石泉市进行。施肥后,我们测量了 72 小时的 NH3 和整个生长季的 N2O。评估了地上 CC 生物量、氮和碳氮比;施肥前土壤硝酸盐;玉米(Zea mays L.)茎秆硝酸盐;以及青贮产量。各施用时间的平均值显示,与 BM 相比,IM 减少了累积 NH3 损失,增加了土壤氮,玉米产量提高了 13%,但产量标度 N2O 增加了。与 BM Late 相比,BM EARLY 减少了 43% 的 NH3 损失,增加了 CC N,减少了 50% 的 N2O 排放,但玉米产量减少了 11%。与迟施相比,早施 IM 时,CC N 增加了 84%,累积 N2O 损失减少了 55%,玉米产量相似。向生长中的 CC 施用粪肥为减少有害的 NH3 和 N2O 排放以及保持玉米产量提供了一种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Crop yield estimation uncertainties at the regional scale for Saxony, Germany Abnormal ear development in corn: Does hybrid, environment, and planting date matter? Yield and profit comparison of diversified versus conventional crop rotation systems in South Dakota Inclusion of cool‐ and warm‐season species in tall fescue swards for increased productivity Precision management influences productivity and nutrients availability in dryland cropping system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1