Standardizing and Scaffolding Healthcare AI-Chatbot Evaluation

Yining Hua, Winna Xia, David W. Bates, Luke Hartstein, Hyungjin Tom Kim, Michael Lingzhi Li, Benjamin W Nelson, Charles Stromeyer, Darlene King, Jina Suh, Li Zhou, John Torous
{"title":"Standardizing and Scaffolding Healthcare AI-Chatbot Evaluation","authors":"Yining Hua, Winna Xia, David W. Bates, Luke Hartstein, Hyungjin Tom Kim, Michael Lingzhi Li, Benjamin W Nelson, Charles Stromeyer, Darlene King, Jina Suh, Li Zhou, John Torous","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.21.24310774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid rise of healthcare chatbots, valued at $787.1 million in 2022 and projected to grow at 23.9% annually through 2030, underscores the need for robust evaluation frameworks. Despite their potential, the absence of standardized evaluation criteria and rapid AI advancements complicate assessments. This study addresses these challenges by developing a the first comprehensive evaluation framework inspired by health app regulations and integrating insights from diverse stakeholders. Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 11 existing frameworks, refining 271 questions into a structured framework encompassing three priority constructs, 18 second-level constructs, and 60 third-level constructs. Our framework emphasizes safety, privacy, trustworthiness, and usefulness, aligning with recent concerns about AI in healthcare. This adaptable framework aims to serve as the initial step in facilitating the responsible integration of chatbots into healthcare settings.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.21.24310774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid rise of healthcare chatbots, valued at $787.1 million in 2022 and projected to grow at 23.9% annually through 2030, underscores the need for robust evaluation frameworks. Despite their potential, the absence of standardized evaluation criteria and rapid AI advancements complicate assessments. This study addresses these challenges by developing a the first comprehensive evaluation framework inspired by health app regulations and integrating insights from diverse stakeholders. Following PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 11 existing frameworks, refining 271 questions into a structured framework encompassing three priority constructs, 18 second-level constructs, and 60 third-level constructs. Our framework emphasizes safety, privacy, trustworthiness, and usefulness, aligning with recent concerns about AI in healthcare. This adaptable framework aims to serve as the initial step in facilitating the responsible integration of chatbots into healthcare settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健人工智能聊天机器人评估的标准化和脚手架化
2022 年,医疗聊天机器人的价值为 7.871 亿美元,预计到 2030 年将以每年 23.9% 的速度增长。尽管医疗机器人潜力巨大,但标准化评估标准的缺失和人工智能的快速发展使评估变得复杂。本研究从健康应用法规中汲取灵感,结合不同利益相关者的见解,制定了首个综合评估框架,以应对这些挑战。根据 PRISMA 指南,我们审查了 11 个现有框架,将 271 个问题细化为一个结构化框架,其中包括 3 个优先结构、18 个二级结构和 60 个三级结构。我们的框架强调安全性、隐私性、可信性和实用性,这与最近人们对医疗保健领域人工智能的关注是一致的。这个可调整的框架旨在作为促进聊天机器人负责任地融入医疗环境的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1