Sensitivity to overfeeding: the Quebec experiment with identical twins.

Progress in food & nutrition science Pub Date : 1988-01-01
C Bouchard, A Tremblay, J P Despres, E T Poehlman, G Theriault, A Nadeau, P Lupien, S Moorjani, J Dussault
{"title":"Sensitivity to overfeeding: the Quebec experiment with identical twins.","authors":"C Bouchard,&nbsp;A Tremblay,&nbsp;J P Despres,&nbsp;E T Poehlman,&nbsp;G Theriault,&nbsp;A Nadeau,&nbsp;P Lupien,&nbsp;S Moorjani,&nbsp;J Dussault","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of the genotype in the response to short-term overfeeding was assessed by submitted six pairs of male monozygotic twins to a 4.2 MJ (1000 kcal) per day energy intake surplus for a period of 22 consecutive days. Individual differences in fat mass and fat-free mass gains were observed in response to overfeeding but they were not randomly distributed. Indeed, the within-pair resemblance in the response was striking when compared to the heterogeneity found among the pairs in adiposity and fat-free mass gains. The intrapair resemblance in the response to overfeeding as assessed by the intraclass coefficient computed with the individual changes, reached 0.88 for total fat mass and 0.76 for fat-free mass. A similar trend for a genetically determined pattern of adaptation to overfeeding was observed for resting metabolic rate (intraclass = 0.63), thermic effect of a meal (intraclass = 0.62), and energy cost of submaximal exercise (intraclass = 0.78) when the data were analysed in terms of changes in oxygen uptake. On the other hand, no major alterations in glucose and insulin response to a glucose load or a test meal, in cardio-pulmonary adaptation to submaximal exercise and in maximal exercise tolerance were found with overfeeding. In contrast, the response of suprailiac fat cell lipolysis (intraclass of about 0.7) and heparin releasable adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (intraclass - 0.82) varied among individuals but was highly homogeneous within genotypes. Similarly, a genotype-overfeeding interaction effect was seen for serum triglycerides (intraclass = 0.69), HDL-cholesterol (intraclass = 0.85), and the HDL-cholesterol to total cholesterol ratio (intraclass = 0.82). Multiple correlation analyses suggest that much of the variance in the response of fat mass (R = 0.65) and fat-free mass (R = 0.81) is accounted for by alterations in the energy expenditure components assessed in the study. If one takes into account the measurement errors always present in such complex studies and the fact that only a limited fraction of the energy expenditure of activity was considered by design, one can conclude that the genotype determines to a large extent the response variation to short-term overfeeding. In particular, the genotype-overfeeding interaction effect for body composition changes seems to be mediated by the various energy expenditure components, themselves characterized by significant genotype-overfeeding interaction effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":76370,"journal":{"name":"Progress in food & nutrition science","volume":"12 1","pages":"45-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in food & nutrition science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The role of the genotype in the response to short-term overfeeding was assessed by submitted six pairs of male monozygotic twins to a 4.2 MJ (1000 kcal) per day energy intake surplus for a period of 22 consecutive days. Individual differences in fat mass and fat-free mass gains were observed in response to overfeeding but they were not randomly distributed. Indeed, the within-pair resemblance in the response was striking when compared to the heterogeneity found among the pairs in adiposity and fat-free mass gains. The intrapair resemblance in the response to overfeeding as assessed by the intraclass coefficient computed with the individual changes, reached 0.88 for total fat mass and 0.76 for fat-free mass. A similar trend for a genetically determined pattern of adaptation to overfeeding was observed for resting metabolic rate (intraclass = 0.63), thermic effect of a meal (intraclass = 0.62), and energy cost of submaximal exercise (intraclass = 0.78) when the data were analysed in terms of changes in oxygen uptake. On the other hand, no major alterations in glucose and insulin response to a glucose load or a test meal, in cardio-pulmonary adaptation to submaximal exercise and in maximal exercise tolerance were found with overfeeding. In contrast, the response of suprailiac fat cell lipolysis (intraclass of about 0.7) and heparin releasable adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase (intraclass - 0.82) varied among individuals but was highly homogeneous within genotypes. Similarly, a genotype-overfeeding interaction effect was seen for serum triglycerides (intraclass = 0.69), HDL-cholesterol (intraclass = 0.85), and the HDL-cholesterol to total cholesterol ratio (intraclass = 0.82). Multiple correlation analyses suggest that much of the variance in the response of fat mass (R = 0.65) and fat-free mass (R = 0.81) is accounted for by alterations in the energy expenditure components assessed in the study. If one takes into account the measurement errors always present in such complex studies and the fact that only a limited fraction of the energy expenditure of activity was considered by design, one can conclude that the genotype determines to a large extent the response variation to short-term overfeeding. In particular, the genotype-overfeeding interaction effect for body composition changes seems to be mediated by the various energy expenditure components, themselves characterized by significant genotype-overfeeding interaction effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对过度喂养的敏感性:魁北克对同卵双胞胎的实验。
通过让6对雄性同卵双胞胎连续22天每天摄入4.2兆焦耳(1000千卡)的能量盈余,评估基因型在短期过度喂养反应中的作用。在脂肪量和无脂质量增加方面观察到个体差异,但它们不是随机分布的。事实上,与肥胖和无脂体重增加的异质性相比,配对内的相似性是惊人的。用个体变化计算的类内系数评估的对过度摄食反应的对内相似性,总脂肪质量达到0.88,无脂肪质量达到0.76。当根据摄氧量的变化分析数据时,在静息代谢率(内分类= 0.63)、膳食热效应(内分类= 0.62)和亚极限运动的能量消耗(内分类= 0.78)中观察到类似的基因决定的过度摄食适应模式的趋势。另一方面,过量进食对葡萄糖负荷或试餐的葡萄糖和胰岛素反应,对亚极限运动的心肺适应和最大运动耐受性没有重大改变。相比之下,乳糜上脂肪细胞脂解(约0.7)和肝素释放脂肪组织脂蛋白脂肪酶(- 0.82)的反应在个体之间有所不同,但在基因型之间是高度均匀的。同样,在血清甘油三酯(内类= 0.69)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(内类= 0.85)和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇与总胆固醇之比(内类= 0.82)中也发现了基因型-过度喂养的相互作用效应。多重相关分析表明,脂肪量(R = 0.65)和无脂肪量(R = 0.81)的反应差异很大程度上是由研究中评估的能量消耗成分的变化造成的。如果考虑到这种复杂研究中总是存在的测量误差,以及设计中只考虑了活动能量消耗的有限部分这一事实,可以得出结论,基因型在很大程度上决定了对短期过度喂养的反应变化。特别是,基因型-过度摄食互作效应对体组成变化的影响似乎是由各种能量消耗成分介导的,而这些能量消耗成分本身具有显著的基因型-过度摄食互作效应。(摘要删节为400字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Protein-Energy Malnutrition The role of boron in nutrition and metabolism. Dietary lipids and immune function. Is vitamin E supplementation a useful agent in AIDS therapy? Vitamin D deficiency: a culprit in metabolic bone disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1