Quantifying vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia

Belinda Neo, Dale Tilbrook, Noel Nannup, Alison Daly, Eleanor Dunlop, John Jacky, Carol Michie, Cindy Prior, Brad Farrant, Carrington C. J. Shepherd, Lucinda J. Black
{"title":"Quantifying vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia","authors":"Belinda Neo, Dale Tilbrook, Noel Nannup, Alison Daly, Eleanor Dunlop, John Jacky, Carol Michie, Cindy Prior, Brad Farrant, Carrington C. J. Shepherd, Lucinda J. Black","doi":"arxiv-2407.13797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Objective: Vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D\n[25(OH)D] concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent among Aboriginal and Torres\nStrait Islander peoples in Australia. Alternative to sun exposure (the primary\nsource of vitamin D), vitamin D can also be obtained from food (e.g., fish,\neggs, and meat) and supplements. However, vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and\nTorres Strait Islander peoples is currently unknown. We aimed to provide the\nfirst quantification of vitamin D intake using nationally representative data\nfrom Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Methods: We used food\nconsumption data collected in the 2012-2013 National Aboriginal and Torres\nStrait Islander Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 4,109) and vitamin\nD food composition data to quantify mean absolute vitamin D intake by sex, age\ngroup, and remoteness of location. Differences in mean vitamin D intake between\nsexes and between remoteness of location were assessed using the 95% confidence\ninterval (95% CI). Results: The mean (standard deviation (SD)) vitamin D intake\namong Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples was 2.9 (3.0) {\\mu}g/day.\nMales had a statistically significantly higher mean (SD) [95% CI] vitamin D\nintake (3.2 (3.1) [3.0-3.4] {\\mu}g/day) than females (2.6 (2.7) [2.4-2.7]\n{\\mu}g/day). There were no statistically significant differences between mean\n(SD) [95% CI] vitamin D intake in non-remote (2.9 (2.2) [2.7-3.1] {\\mu}g/day)\nand remote areas (2.8 (4.8) [2.6-3.0] {\\mu}g/day). Conclusions: Vitamin D\nintake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is low. Food-based\npublic health strategies could be developed to promote higher vitamin D intake\namong this population.","PeriodicalId":501219,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.13797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: Vitamin D deficiency (serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration <50 nmol/L) is prevalent among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia. Alternative to sun exposure (the primary source of vitamin D), vitamin D can also be obtained from food (e.g., fish, eggs, and meat) and supplements. However, vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is currently unknown. We aimed to provide the first quantification of vitamin D intake using nationally representative data from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Methods: We used food consumption data collected in the 2012-2013 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (n = 4,109) and vitamin D food composition data to quantify mean absolute vitamin D intake by sex, age group, and remoteness of location. Differences in mean vitamin D intake between sexes and between remoteness of location were assessed using the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: The mean (standard deviation (SD)) vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples was 2.9 (3.0) {\mu}g/day. Males had a statistically significantly higher mean (SD) [95% CI] vitamin D intake (3.2 (3.1) [3.0-3.4] {\mu}g/day) than females (2.6 (2.7) [2.4-2.7] {\mu}g/day). There were no statistically significant differences between mean (SD) [95% CI] vitamin D intake in non-remote (2.9 (2.2) [2.7-3.1] {\mu}g/day) and remote areas (2.8 (4.8) [2.6-3.0] {\mu}g/day). Conclusions: Vitamin D intake among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is low. Food-based public health strategies could be developed to promote higher vitamin D intake among this population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的维生素 D 摄入量
背景/目的:维生素 D 缺乏症(血清 25- 羟维生素 D[25(OH)D] 浓度低于 50 nmol/L)在澳大利亚土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民中十分普遍。除了阳光照射(维生素 D 的主要来源),维生素 D 还可以从食物(如鱼、蛋和肉)和补充剂中获得。然而,原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的维生素 D 摄入量目前尚不清楚。我们的目的是首次利用具有全国代表性的原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民数据对维生素 D 的摄入量进行量化。方法:我们利用2012-2013年全国原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民营养与体育活动调查(n = 4,109)中收集的食物消费数据和维生素D食物成分数据,按性别、年龄组和地点偏远程度对维生素D绝对摄入量的平均值进行了量化。性别间和偏远地区间维生素 D 平均摄入量的差异采用 95% 置信区间 (95% CI) 进行评估。结果男性的维生素D平均摄入量(标准差(SD)[95% CI])(3.2(3.1)[3.0-3.4]{\mu}g/天)明显高于女性(2.6(2.7)[2.4-2.7]{\mu}g/天)。非偏远地区(2.9 (2.2) [2.7-3.1] {\mu}克/天)和偏远地区(2.8 (4.8) [2.6-3.0] {\mu}克/天)的维生素 D 平均摄入量(标度)[95% CI]之间没有明显的统计学差异。结论:土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民的维生素D摄入量较低。可以制定以食物为基础的公共卫生策略,以促进该人群摄入更多的维生素D。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunities and challenges of mRNA technologies in development of Dengue Virus Vaccine Compatibility studies of loquat scions with loquat and quince rootstocks Analysis of Potential Biases and Validity of Studies Using Multiverse Approaches to Assess the Impacts of Government Responses to Epidemics Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Targeted Drug Delivery Systems for Colorectal Cancer Therapy: A Review Unveiling Parkinson's Disease-like Changes Triggered by Spaceflight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1