Compatibility studies of loquat scions with loquat and quince rootstocks

Rasul Rafiq Aziz, Fakhraddin Mustafa Hama Salih, Ibrahim Maaroof Noori
{"title":"Compatibility studies of loquat scions with loquat and quince rootstocks","authors":"Rasul Rafiq Aziz, Fakhraddin Mustafa Hama Salih, Ibrahim Maaroof Noori","doi":"arxiv-2409.11451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experiment 1. Rooting of quince hardwood cuttings: Rooting success was\ninfluenced by both the concentrations of IBA and the selection of rooting\nmedia. However, the control group (without IBA) notably enhanced rooting when\ncompared to the various IBA concentrations. Cuttings in the control group\n(without IBA) and those planted in river sand exhibited notably high\npercentages of successful rooting, underscoring the importance of the selected\nplanting medium. Experiment 2. Bench grafting of loquat: The success of\ngrafting loquat cutting stocks varied based on grafting dates, types of\ncuttings, and concentrations of IBA. However, IBA at different concentrations\ndid not have a significant impact. Notably, certain interactions such as\ngrafting on February 20 with loquat stock cuttings, yielded higher percentages\nof successful graft bud sprouting. Experiment 3. Performance of grafting\nloquats onto different rootstocks: Grafting success was notably influenced by\nthe selection of rootstock, with loquat rootstock demonstrating superior\nperformance compared to quince. The highest significant levels of successful\ngrafting were attained on February 20, underscoring the crucial role of\ngrafting dates. Experiment 4. Impact of tree stock types on grafting success:\nGrafting success percentage was higher in loquat tree stock when compared to\nquince. The consistency of grafting success percentages across three dates\nunderscores the significant influence of rootstock type. Experiment 5. Bench\ngrafting of loquat cutting stocks: Graft bud sprout percentages exhibited\nvariations, with loquat stock cuttings surpassing quince. Grafting success\ndemonstrated a consistent increase from February 20 to March 30, underscoring\nthe importance of selecting appropriate grafting dates.","PeriodicalId":501219,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Other Quantitative Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experiment 1. Rooting of quince hardwood cuttings: Rooting success was influenced by both the concentrations of IBA and the selection of rooting media. However, the control group (without IBA) notably enhanced rooting when compared to the various IBA concentrations. Cuttings in the control group (without IBA) and those planted in river sand exhibited notably high percentages of successful rooting, underscoring the importance of the selected planting medium. Experiment 2. Bench grafting of loquat: The success of grafting loquat cutting stocks varied based on grafting dates, types of cuttings, and concentrations of IBA. However, IBA at different concentrations did not have a significant impact. Notably, certain interactions such as grafting on February 20 with loquat stock cuttings, yielded higher percentages of successful graft bud sprouting. Experiment 3. Performance of grafting loquats onto different rootstocks: Grafting success was notably influenced by the selection of rootstock, with loquat rootstock demonstrating superior performance compared to quince. The highest significant levels of successful grafting were attained on February 20, underscoring the crucial role of grafting dates. Experiment 4. Impact of tree stock types on grafting success: Grafting success percentage was higher in loquat tree stock when compared to quince. The consistency of grafting success percentages across three dates underscores the significant influence of rootstock type. Experiment 5. Bench grafting of loquat cutting stocks: Graft bud sprout percentages exhibited variations, with loquat stock cuttings surpassing quince. Grafting success demonstrated a consistent increase from February 20 to March 30, underscoring the importance of selecting appropriate grafting dates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
枇杷接穗与枇杷和榅桲砧木的兼容性研究
实验 1.榅桲硬木插条的生根:生根成功率受 IBA 浓度和生根介质选择的影响。然而,与不同浓度的 IBA 相比,对照组(不含 IBA)的生根率明显提高。对照组(不含 IBA)和种植在河沙中的插条的生根成功率明显较高,这突出表明了所选种植介质的重要性。实验 2.枇杷的台式嫁接:根据嫁接日期、插条类型和 IBA 浓度的不同,枇杷插条的嫁接成功率也不同。然而,不同浓度的 IBA 并没有显著影响。值得注意的是,某些交互作用,如在 2 月 20 日嫁接枇杷扦插苗,嫁接芽萌发的成功率较高。实验 3.将枇杷嫁接到不同砧木上的效果:砧木的选择对嫁接成功率有显著影响,枇杷砧木的表现优于榅桲砧木。2 月 20 日的嫁接成功率最高,这说明嫁接日期的关键作用。实验 4.树种对嫁接成功率的影响:与榅桲相比,枇杷树种的嫁接成功率更高。三个日期的嫁接成功率一致,说明砧木类型对嫁接的影响很大。实验 5.枇杷砧木的基准嫁接:嫁接芽萌发率出现了变化,枇杷扦插苗超过了榅桲。从 2 月 20 日到 3 月 30 日,嫁接成功率持续上升,这说明选择适当嫁接日期的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opportunities and challenges of mRNA technologies in development of Dengue Virus Vaccine Compatibility studies of loquat scions with loquat and quince rootstocks Analysis of Potential Biases and Validity of Studies Using Multiverse Approaches to Assess the Impacts of Government Responses to Epidemics Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Targeted Drug Delivery Systems for Colorectal Cancer Therapy: A Review Unveiling Parkinson's Disease-like Changes Triggered by Spaceflight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1