G. I. Bebeshko, G. G. Omel’yanyuk, O. V. Samoilova, A. I. Usov
{"title":"Assessing the Reliability of the Forensic Technique for the Identification Study of Motor Gasoline Using Gas-Liquid Chromatography","authors":"G. I. Bebeshko, G. G. Omel’yanyuk, O. V. Samoilova, A. I. Usov","doi":"10.1134/s0020168524700134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Abstract</h3><p>A new approach to solving the problems of forensic examination of petroleum products, fuels, and lubricants associated with establishing whether motor gasoline belongs to a common/different identification variety is proposed. A technique for the identification of gasoline using quantitative results of chromatographic determination of controlled parameters and subsequent evaluation of the results in pairwise compared samples according to the established criteria is developed. The following parameters were selected as controlled parameters: values of research octane number (RON), concentrations of hydrocarbon groups (paraffins, isoparaffins, arenes, naphthenes, olefins) and oxygenates. Their determination was carried out using standardized methods. We used the hardware and software complex of the Chromatec-Crystal 5000 series, including the Chromatec-DHA data processing program. Estimated criteria or decision-making rules regarding the issues posed to an expert were determined to classify gasoline under one product name (generic variety), one production technology (group variety), or a common source of origin (one production batch, storage tank, etc.). The reliability of the method was assessed using a validation procedure consisting of three stages. We used a collection of AI-92 motor gasoline, selected at gas stations of four oil companies during six months of 2022 in various districts of Moscow. At the first stage, the performer analyzed 12 aliquots of each of four gasoline samples (samples that previously belonged to the common volume) at different times. It was established that the quality indicators of the proposed technique (standard deviation of the repeatability and reproducibility, expanded uncertainty, limits of the repeatability and reproducibility) for each of the determined controlled indicators did not exceed the permissible errors established by standardized methods. At the second stage of the experiment, the performer combined 12 test samples into four groups from each manufacturer (one production technology) with three samples of different production times (different batches). By comparing the discrepancies in the measured values of the same controlled indicators between pairs of samples within groups and the discrepancy in average indicators between pairs of groups, the performer establish gasolines manufactured using the same technology; gasolines produced by the same technology, but at different times (different batches); and with a probability of 95%, gasolines having a common source of origin (previously belonging to a common volume). The conclusions of the validation study matched the original data on the samples, which confirmed the correctness of the developed comparison criteria. At the third stage (blind test), the performer examined seven gasoline samples information about the composition and properties of which was not provided to him. The results of the blind test were considered satisfactory. Thus, the results of validation indicate the suitability of the methodology for solving forensic identification problems in relation to motor gasoline and the competence of the performer technique for implementation of the technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":585,"journal":{"name":"Inorganic Materials","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inorganic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1134/s0020168524700134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A new approach to solving the problems of forensic examination of petroleum products, fuels, and lubricants associated with establishing whether motor gasoline belongs to a common/different identification variety is proposed. A technique for the identification of gasoline using quantitative results of chromatographic determination of controlled parameters and subsequent evaluation of the results in pairwise compared samples according to the established criteria is developed. The following parameters were selected as controlled parameters: values of research octane number (RON), concentrations of hydrocarbon groups (paraffins, isoparaffins, arenes, naphthenes, olefins) and oxygenates. Their determination was carried out using standardized methods. We used the hardware and software complex of the Chromatec-Crystal 5000 series, including the Chromatec-DHA data processing program. Estimated criteria or decision-making rules regarding the issues posed to an expert were determined to classify gasoline under one product name (generic variety), one production technology (group variety), or a common source of origin (one production batch, storage tank, etc.). The reliability of the method was assessed using a validation procedure consisting of three stages. We used a collection of AI-92 motor gasoline, selected at gas stations of four oil companies during six months of 2022 in various districts of Moscow. At the first stage, the performer analyzed 12 aliquots of each of four gasoline samples (samples that previously belonged to the common volume) at different times. It was established that the quality indicators of the proposed technique (standard deviation of the repeatability and reproducibility, expanded uncertainty, limits of the repeatability and reproducibility) for each of the determined controlled indicators did not exceed the permissible errors established by standardized methods. At the second stage of the experiment, the performer combined 12 test samples into four groups from each manufacturer (one production technology) with three samples of different production times (different batches). By comparing the discrepancies in the measured values of the same controlled indicators between pairs of samples within groups and the discrepancy in average indicators between pairs of groups, the performer establish gasolines manufactured using the same technology; gasolines produced by the same technology, but at different times (different batches); and with a probability of 95%, gasolines having a common source of origin (previously belonging to a common volume). The conclusions of the validation study matched the original data on the samples, which confirmed the correctness of the developed comparison criteria. At the third stage (blind test), the performer examined seven gasoline samples information about the composition and properties of which was not provided to him. The results of the blind test were considered satisfactory. Thus, the results of validation indicate the suitability of the methodology for solving forensic identification problems in relation to motor gasoline and the competence of the performer technique for implementation of the technique.
期刊介绍：
Inorganic Materials is a journal that publishes reviews and original articles devoted to chemistry, physics, and applications of various inorganic materials including high-purity substances and materials. The journal discusses phase equilibria, including P–T–X diagrams, and the fundamentals of inorganic materials science, which determines preparatory conditions for compounds of various compositions with specified deviations from stoichiometry. Inorganic Materials is a multidisciplinary journal covering all classes of inorganic materials. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
