Unlocking sustainability: prioritizing barriers for SME success in India with AHP analysis

Vineet Pandey, Sudesh Kumar, Sumit Gupta, Narendra Khatri
{"title":"Unlocking sustainability: prioritizing barriers for SME success in India with AHP analysis","authors":"Vineet Pandey, Sudesh Kumar, Sumit Gupta, Narendra Khatri","doi":"10.1007/s40497-024-00395-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) constitute the nation’s foundation and facilitate the advancement of invention and economic progress. Sustainability is considered the latest paradigm in the manufacturing sector. SMEs need to use innovative production and management technologies to address triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The current research focuses on identifying and prioritizing barriers to sustainability in SMEs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methodology</h3><p>The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is used to prioritize sustainability barriers in SMEs. A hierarchical framework is developed based on six main criteria and seven alternatives. The six criteria are cost, risk, innovation, feasibility, stakeholders, impact, and seven alternatives: employee satisfaction, training, energy efficiency, procurement, awareness, renewable sources, and waste reduction. The Super Decisions software V3.2 applied relative weights to these criteria and alternatives, utilizing the AHP, a multi-criteria decision method (MCDM), to evaluate the SME owner responses from 116 SMEs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Findings</h3><p>The AHP analysis highlights economic considerations, with cost given the highest weight of 0.42. Government support via incentives, tax breaks, subsidies, or financing is essential to address this issue. Impact (0.31) and feasibility (0.11) are also critical, underscoring the need for proactive sustainability measures in SMEs. The study provides a thorough grasp of sustainability challenges and offers a strategic framework for SMEs and policymakers. Prioritizing staff training, energy efficiency, employee satisfaction, public awareness, waste reduction, renewable energy, and procurement is advised to enhance sustainability practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":45024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-024-00395-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) constitute the nation’s foundation and facilitate the advancement of invention and economic progress. Sustainability is considered the latest paradigm in the manufacturing sector. SMEs need to use innovative production and management technologies to address triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The current research focuses on identifying and prioritizing barriers to sustainability in SMEs.

Methodology

The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is used to prioritize sustainability barriers in SMEs. A hierarchical framework is developed based on six main criteria and seven alternatives. The six criteria are cost, risk, innovation, feasibility, stakeholders, impact, and seven alternatives: employee satisfaction, training, energy efficiency, procurement, awareness, renewable sources, and waste reduction. The Super Decisions software V3.2 applied relative weights to these criteria and alternatives, utilizing the AHP, a multi-criteria decision method (MCDM), to evaluate the SME owner responses from 116 SMEs.

Findings

The AHP analysis highlights economic considerations, with cost given the highest weight of 0.42. Government support via incentives, tax breaks, subsidies, or financing is essential to address this issue. Impact (0.31) and feasibility (0.11) are also critical, underscoring the need for proactive sustainability measures in SMEs. The study provides a thorough grasp of sustainability challenges and offers a strategic framework for SMEs and policymakers. Prioritizing staff training, energy efficiency, employee satisfaction, public awareness, waste reduction, renewable energy, and procurement is advised to enhance sustainability practices.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开启可持续性:利用 AHP 分析法确定印度中小企业成功障碍的优先次序
目的中小型企业(SMEs)是国家的基础,促进了发明创造和经济进步。可持续发展被认为是制造业的最新模式。中小企业需要利用创新的生产和管理技术来解决三重底线(TBL)可持续性问题,以实现可持续发展目标(SDGs)。目前的研究重点是确定中小企业的可持续发展障碍并对其进行优先排序。方法采用层次分析法(AHP)对中小企业的可持续发展障碍进行优先排序。根据六个主要标准和七个备选方案制定了一个层次框架。六个标准是成本、风险、创新、可行性、利益相关者、影响,七个备选方案是:员工满意度、培训、能源效率、采购、意识、可再生能源和减少废物。超级决策软件 V3.2 对这些标准和备选方案应用了相对权重,利用多标准决策方法(MCDM)--AHP,对 116 家中小企业所有者的答复进行了评估。政府通过奖励、减税、补贴或融资等方式提供支持对于解决这一问题至关重要。影响(0.31)和可行性(0.11)也至关重要,这突出表明中小企业需要采取积极的可持续发展措施。本研究透彻把握了可持续发展所面临的挑战,并为中小企业和政策制定者提供了一个战略框架。建议优先考虑员工培训、能源效率、员工满意度、公众意识、减少废物、可再生能源和采购,以加强可持续发展实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Investigating the effects of the challenges faced by women entrepreneurs on their entrepreneurial capabilities and developing effective entrepreneurship strategies Subjective well-being of entrepreneurs during COVID-19 pandemic: a bibliometric analysis Untangling the nexus of entrepreneurship and unemployment: a bibliometric review Women driving Philippine entrepreneurship: Social and governance issues as mediated by economic development Development in rural entrepreneurship and future scope of research: a bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1