The Corporate Governance of Business Groups Around the World: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Corporate Governance-An International Review Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1111/corg.12603
Ruth V. Aguilera, Ryan Federo, Raquel Justo, Adrian Luis Merida, Bartolomé Pascual‐Fuster
{"title":"The Corporate Governance of Business Groups Around the World: A Review and Agenda for Future Research","authors":"Ruth V. Aguilera, Ryan Federo, Raquel Justo, Adrian Luis Merida, Bartolomé Pascual‐Fuster","doi":"10.1111/corg.12603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Question/IssueScholarly interest in business groups (BGs) has grown considerably over the years, as they emerged as important players in the global economy. Yet, there exist ample differences in the corporate governance, strategies, and performance of BG‐affiliated firms. Given that BGs differ substantially across national institutional contexts, previous studies provide inconclusive arguments and empirical evidence regarding the complex relationship between corporate governance and firm performance within BGs.Research Findings/InsightsOur review of 301 articles published in highly ranked journals between 1986 and 2023 establishes a mechanism‐based framework to explain the effect of BG affiliation, ownership structure, and corporate governance practices on firm performance. We also reveal that many relationships between these factors vary cross‐nationally and over time, contingent on the national institutional strength where BGs are domiciled and operate.Theoretical/Academic ImplicationsWe develop a mechanism‐based framework to unpack the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance within BGs and discuss previous studies' findings across different institutional settings. We find that some mechanisms are generally applicable to BGs in many contexts, whereas others only hold in particular institutional conditions. We then offer several research avenues for further scholarly attention.Practitioner/Policy ImplicationsManagers and policy makers should consider cross‐national differences to fully understand BGs. Ultimately, our review demonstrates that there is no one‐size‐fits‐all approach to BGs because their roles, functioning, and outcomes differ across institutional settings.","PeriodicalId":48209,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance-An International Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance-An International Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12603","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Question/IssueScholarly interest in business groups (BGs) has grown considerably over the years, as they emerged as important players in the global economy. Yet, there exist ample differences in the corporate governance, strategies, and performance of BG‐affiliated firms. Given that BGs differ substantially across national institutional contexts, previous studies provide inconclusive arguments and empirical evidence regarding the complex relationship between corporate governance and firm performance within BGs.Research Findings/InsightsOur review of 301 articles published in highly ranked journals between 1986 and 2023 establishes a mechanism‐based framework to explain the effect of BG affiliation, ownership structure, and corporate governance practices on firm performance. We also reveal that many relationships between these factors vary cross‐nationally and over time, contingent on the national institutional strength where BGs are domiciled and operate.Theoretical/Academic ImplicationsWe develop a mechanism‐based framework to unpack the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance within BGs and discuss previous studies' findings across different institutional settings. We find that some mechanisms are generally applicable to BGs in many contexts, whereas others only hold in particular institutional conditions. We then offer several research avenues for further scholarly attention.Practitioner/Policy ImplicationsManagers and policy makers should consider cross‐national differences to fully understand BGs. Ultimately, our review demonstrates that there is no one‐size‐fits‐all approach to BGs because their roles, functioning, and outcomes differ across institutional settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
世界各地企业集团的公司治理:回顾与未来研究议程
研究问题/议题多年来,随着企业集团(BGs)在全球经济中崭露头角,学术界对它们的兴趣与日俱增。然而,企业集团下属企业在公司治理、战略和绩效方面存在很大差异。鉴于企业集团在不同国家的制度背景下存在很大差异,以往的研究就企业集团内部公司治理与公司绩效之间的复杂关系提供了不确定的论据和经验证据。研究结果/启示我们回顾了 1986 年至 2023 年间在排名靠前的期刊上发表的 301 篇文章,建立了一个基于机制的框架来解释企业集团关联、所有权结构和公司治理实践对公司绩效的影响。我们还揭示了这些因素之间的许多关系在不同国家和不同时期存在差异,这取决于企业集团注册地和运营地的国家制度优势。理论/学术意义我们建立了一个基于机制的框架,以解读企业集团内部公司治理与公司业绩之间的关系,并讨论了以往不同制度环境下的研究结果。我们发现,一些机制普遍适用于许多背景下的企业集团,而另一些机制则只在特定的制度条件下成立。然后,我们提出了几条研究途径,供学者们进一步关注。实践者/政策含义管理者和政策制定者应考虑跨国差异,以充分了解企业集团。最终,我们的综述表明,没有一种放之四海而皆准的方法来处理性别平等问题,因为在不同的机构环境中,性别平等的作用、功能和结果都不尽相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.30%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: The mission of Corporate Governance: An International Review is to publish cutting-edge international business research on the phenomena of comparative corporate governance throughout the global economy. Our ultimate goal is a rigorous and relevant global theory of corporate governance. We define corporate governance broadly as the exercise of power over corporate entities so as to increase the value provided to the organization"s various stakeholders, as well as making those stakeholders accountable for acting responsibly with regard to the protection, generation, and distribution of wealth invested in the firm. Because of this broad conceptualization, a wide variety of academic disciplines can contribute to our understanding.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Litigation Cost of Cross‐Listing Into the United States Lifting Women Up: Gender Quotas and the Advancement of Women on Corporate Boards From Universal Owners to Owners of the Universe? How the Big Three Are Reshaping Corporate Governance Boardroom Dissent: An Integrative Review and Future Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1