Flipping the script in organic reaction mechanism instruction: using generative pedagogies instead of lecture to improve learning outcomes

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Chemistry Education Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1039/d3rp00322a
Connor Haindfield, William Cerbin, Douglas Baumann, Heather Schenck
{"title":"Flipping the script in organic reaction mechanism instruction: using generative pedagogies instead of lecture to improve learning outcomes","authors":"Connor Haindfield, William Cerbin, Douglas Baumann, Heather Schenck","doi":"10.1039/d3rp00322a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two generative approaches to reaction mechanism instruction for novice students were compared to lecture instruction. In both approaches, students were coached to propose selected reaction mechanisms based on prior knowledge. New instructional methods were correlated with increased skill in representations of electron movements and other gains. Students who saw a larger amount of new pedagogy showed stronger abilities to propose mechanisms for unfamiliar reactions. In the group that saw a larger amount of new pedagogy, first-generation college student (FGS) grades rose to match non-FGS grades. Learning gains were interpreted with respect to cognitive load theory, flagging high element interactivity as a likely obstacle for novice students. Problem solving during mechanism instruction for novice students offers the potential to improve learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00322a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two generative approaches to reaction mechanism instruction for novice students were compared to lecture instruction. In both approaches, students were coached to propose selected reaction mechanisms based on prior knowledge. New instructional methods were correlated with increased skill in representations of electron movements and other gains. Students who saw a larger amount of new pedagogy showed stronger abilities to propose mechanisms for unfamiliar reactions. In the group that saw a larger amount of new pedagogy, first-generation college student (FGS) grades rose to match non-FGS grades. Learning gains were interpreted with respect to cognitive load theory, flagging high element interactivity as a likely obstacle for novice students. Problem solving during mechanism instruction for novice students offers the potential to improve learning outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
翻转有机反应机理教学的剧本:用生成教学法代替讲授法提高学习效果
针对新手学生的两种反应机制生成式教学方法与讲授式教学进行了比较。在这两种教学方法中,学生都是在已有知识的基础上提出选定的反应机理。新的教学方法与电子运动表征技能的提高及其他收获相关。看到较多新教学方法的学生表现出更强的能力,能够为不熟悉的反应提出反应机理。在使用了较多新教学法的小组中,第一代大学生(FGS)的成绩上升到了与非 FGS 成绩相当的水平。根据认知负荷理论对学习收益进行了解释,指出高元素交互性可能是新手学生的障碍。在新手学生的机制教学中解决问题有可能提高学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing the accessibility of chemistry assessment for multilingual learners: Understanding challenging features in assessment items A case study on graduate teaching assistants’ teacher noticing when enacting a case-comparison activity in organic chemistry How Upper Secondary Students Figure Chemistry Flipping the script in organic reaction mechanism instruction: using generative pedagogies instead of lecture to improve learning outcomes Recognition Experiences of Women of Color in Chemistry: An Intersectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1