Criterion Measures Are Not Always Continuous: Consequential Validity Ratio for Logistic Regression

Yixiao Dong, Kushmakar Baral, Denis Dumas
{"title":"Criterion Measures Are Not Always Continuous: Consequential Validity Ratio for Logistic Regression","authors":"Yixiao Dong, Kushmakar Baral, Denis Dumas","doi":"10.1080/00220973.2024.2369333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neither the theoretical conceptualization of validity, validation methodologies, nor the relative importance of different aspects of validity in measure development, is static over time. With the e...","PeriodicalId":501538,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Experimental Education","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Experimental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2024.2369333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neither the theoretical conceptualization of validity, validation methodologies, nor the relative importance of different aspects of validity in measure development, is static over time. With the e...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
标准测量并不总是连续的:逻辑回归的后果效度比
无论是效度的理论概念、验证方法,还是效度的不同方面在测量开发中的相对重要性,都不是一成不变的。随着时代的变迁,...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills for Word Problems: Impact of Diagram and Learner Expertise Imbalances in Two-Level Hierarchical Linear Modeling of Single-Case Data: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study Development and Validation of Online Social Achievement Goals Questionnaire for College Students Class Enumeration in Mixture Modeling with Nested Data: A Brief Report Investigating a Novel Approach to Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1