{"title":"Factors affecting lymph node yield and density in neck dissection.","authors":"Pelle Hanberg, Trine Tramm, Arunas Pikelis, Sten Schytte, Søren Dürr Gade, Tejs Ehlers Klug","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2024.2380863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies suggest that neck dissections with a minimum of 16-18 yielded nodes are associated with better overall survival compared to neck dissections with lower yields.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to identify factors affecting the lymph node yield and density in patients with oral cavity cancer undergoing elective neck dissection levels 1-3.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using prospectively registered data, we conducted a population-based cohort study on all patients surgically treated for oral cavity cancer including levels 1-3 neck dissection at our institution from 2018 to 2022. Uni and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with lymph node yields.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 221 patients were included. The mean lymph nodes yield and density were 19 (95%CI 18-20) and 0.12 (95%CI 0.09-0.16), respectively. In multivariate analysis, increasing body weight (<i>p</i> = .034) was positively and previous radiotherapy (<i>p</i> = .006) were negatively correlated with the number of yielded lymph nodes. Lymph node density was positively correlated with body weight (<i>p</i> = .011) and body mass index (<i>p</i> = .032) in univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and significance: </strong>Increasing body weight was positively and previous radiotherapy was negatively correlated to lymph node yield. These factors should be taken into consideration when interpreting the lymph node yield as an indicator of neck dissection quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2024.2380863","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Studies suggest that neck dissections with a minimum of 16-18 yielded nodes are associated with better overall survival compared to neck dissections with lower yields.
Aims: We aimed to identify factors affecting the lymph node yield and density in patients with oral cavity cancer undergoing elective neck dissection levels 1-3.
Materials and methods: Using prospectively registered data, we conducted a population-based cohort study on all patients surgically treated for oral cavity cancer including levels 1-3 neck dissection at our institution from 2018 to 2022. Uni and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with lymph node yields.
Results: In total, 221 patients were included. The mean lymph nodes yield and density were 19 (95%CI 18-20) and 0.12 (95%CI 0.09-0.16), respectively. In multivariate analysis, increasing body weight (p = .034) was positively and previous radiotherapy (p = .006) were negatively correlated with the number of yielded lymph nodes. Lymph node density was positively correlated with body weight (p = .011) and body mass index (p = .032) in univariate analysis.
Conclusions and significance: Increasing body weight was positively and previous radiotherapy was negatively correlated to lymph node yield. These factors should be taken into consideration when interpreting the lymph node yield as an indicator of neck dissection quality.
期刊介绍:
Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.