Tsz Yin Voravitvet, Yenlin Huang, Sawarin Voravitvet, Juan Larsson, Po-Hao Lien, David Chwei-Chin Chuang, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang
{"title":"Dynamic Eye Closure Restoration in Facial Palsy with Neurotized Platysma Muscle Graft in Rats.","authors":"Tsz Yin Voravitvet, Yenlin Huang, Sawarin Voravitvet, Juan Larsson, Po-Hao Lien, David Chwei-Chin Chuang, Johnny Chuieng-Yi Lu, Tommy Nai-Jen Chang","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> One of the most devastating deficits of facial paralysis is eyelid dysfunction, which is controlled by the orbicularis oculi muscle (OOM), as it leads to loss of the protective mechanism of the eye. This study used a rat model to assess the functional outcomes of neurotized platysma muscle grafts (PMGs) for OOM replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats with iatrogenic right eyelid dysfunction were divided into five groups: one control group and four groups utilizing PMG with different sources of nerve innervation. Eyelid function recovery was assessed at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. The PMGs were harvested for pathological examination at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> All rats except those in the control group and one from the group using ipsilateral frontal and upper zygomatic frontal nerve branches directly neurotized to the PMG (nerve-to-muscle) recovered eyelid closure function within 8 weeks of the study period. The mean recovery time was 3.87 ± 1.28 weeks. A total of 87.5% of rats that had the contralateral zygomatic branch as the donor nerve regained the consensual corneal reflex (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Replacement of neurotized PMG for OOM function is successful in a rat model. Using the upper zygomatic branch as the donor nerve, it was possible to restore the consensual corneal reflex. This method shows promise for further human studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788565","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: One of the most devastating deficits of facial paralysis is eyelid dysfunction, which is controlled by the orbicularis oculi muscle (OOM), as it leads to loss of the protective mechanism of the eye. This study used a rat model to assess the functional outcomes of neurotized platysma muscle grafts (PMGs) for OOM replacement.
Methods: Forty male Sprague-Dawley rats with iatrogenic right eyelid dysfunction were divided into five groups: one control group and four groups utilizing PMG with different sources of nerve innervation. Eyelid function recovery was assessed at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks. The PMGs were harvested for pathological examination at the end of the study.
Results: All rats except those in the control group and one from the group using ipsilateral frontal and upper zygomatic frontal nerve branches directly neurotized to the PMG (nerve-to-muscle) recovered eyelid closure function within 8 weeks of the study period. The mean recovery time was 3.87 ± 1.28 weeks. A total of 87.5% of rats that had the contralateral zygomatic branch as the donor nerve regained the consensual corneal reflex (p-value < 0.001).
Conclusion: Replacement of neurotized PMG for OOM function is successful in a rat model. Using the upper zygomatic branch as the donor nerve, it was possible to restore the consensual corneal reflex. This method shows promise for further human studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.