{"title":"Unlocking the Potential of the HEART Pathway: Predicting MACE and Facilitating Nurse-Physician Collaboration in Chest Pain Unit.","authors":"Zahra Behpour, Zahra Amirsardari, Haniye Aghakhani, Mohammadesmaeil Zanganehfar, Shiva Khaleghparast, Fidan Shabani, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Parham Sadeghipour","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The HEART pathway serves as a tool for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among patients presenting with acute chest pain, aiding in early discharge of low-risk patients and reducing unnecessary cardiac investigations. This study aimed to evaluate physician-nurse reliability of the HEART pathway. Moreover investigates the efficacy of HEART pathway to predict 3-month MACE in patients with acute chest pain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a prospective study on 97 patients experiencing acute chest pain. A team of three professionals - a nurse, a cardiology resident, and a cardiology attending physician - performed risk stratification. We assessed inter-rater reliability among the raters as well as explored 3-month MACE outcomes.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Excellent pairwise agreements were found between the raters. Overall agreement among raters was excellent, with an ICC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73 - 0.97). The HEART pathway score exhibited strong predictive power (AUC: 0.85) for 3-month MACE. At a cut-off score of 4, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values were 87.5%, 58.9%, and 95.8%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HEART pathway score effectively predicts 3-month MACE in patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain. Moreover, the high agreement among the attending physician, the resident physician, and the nurse suggests that nurses could use this tool, potentially reducing the workload on physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: The HEART pathway serves as a tool for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among patients presenting with acute chest pain, aiding in early discharge of low-risk patients and reducing unnecessary cardiac investigations. This study aimed to evaluate physician-nurse reliability of the HEART pathway. Moreover investigates the efficacy of HEART pathway to predict 3-month MACE in patients with acute chest pain.
Method: We conducted a prospective study on 97 patients experiencing acute chest pain. A team of three professionals - a nurse, a cardiology resident, and a cardiology attending physician - performed risk stratification. We assessed inter-rater reliability among the raters as well as explored 3-month MACE outcomes.
Result: Excellent pairwise agreements were found between the raters. Overall agreement among raters was excellent, with an ICC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73 - 0.97). The HEART pathway score exhibited strong predictive power (AUC: 0.85) for 3-month MACE. At a cut-off score of 4, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values were 87.5%, 58.9%, and 95.8%, respectively.
Conclusion: The HEART pathway score effectively predicts 3-month MACE in patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain. Moreover, the high agreement among the attending physician, the resident physician, and the nurse suggests that nurses could use this tool, potentially reducing the workload on physicians.
期刊介绍:
Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.