Speech recognition and speech audiometry parameters in evaluation of aural rehabilitation progress in cochlear implant patients. Review paper.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Polish Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0054.5438
Przemysław Ryćko, Marek Rogowski
{"title":"Speech recognition and speech audiometry parameters in evaluation of aural rehabilitation progress in cochlear implant patients. Review paper.","authors":"Przemysław Ryćko, Marek Rogowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0054.5438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Speech audiometry is well established and frequently used test in audiology as well as in cochlear implant recipient's performance evaluation. Expanding indications for cochlear implantation forces use of more refined methods of both assessment and prognosis of outcome of aural rehabilitation. Variability of speech intelligibility tests and materials require standardized protocol facilitating outcome comparison.&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; Aim of this review paper is analysis of usage of speech audiometry and other speech intelligibility tests and its results reporting in patients with cochlear implant in Poland and in the World.&lt;b&gt;Materials and methods:&lt;/b&gt; Protocols of many different domestic and foreign health centers where compared, showing many methodological differences. Selection of literature for analysis was made according to PRISMA algorithm recommendations. Twenty research papers were chosen for review process.&lt;b&gt;Discussion:&lt;/b&gt; In many papers we found lack of data regarding methodology of performed tests. Many authors indicate difficulties in comparing results, especially if publication lacks basic technical information. Despite that if right method is applied, results can be compared. In literature only one level of material presentation in test is prevalent. Speech audiometry is significant in exploring connections between multiple pre-op and post-op prognostic aspects of cochlear implantation.&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Because of variability in presentation and reporting of CI patients outcomes, consensus is needed in area of system facilitating comparison of research results. This may provide simple solution for accurate analysis and choosing right set of data. Schematic of presentation of audiological data in authors health center was proposed as example.</p>","PeriodicalId":42608,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"78 4","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.5438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Speech audiometry is well established and frequently used test in audiology as well as in cochlear implant recipient's performance evaluation. Expanding indications for cochlear implantation forces use of more refined methods of both assessment and prognosis of outcome of aural rehabilitation. Variability of speech intelligibility tests and materials require standardized protocol facilitating outcome comparison.<b>Aim:</b> Aim of this review paper is analysis of usage of speech audiometry and other speech intelligibility tests and its results reporting in patients with cochlear implant in Poland and in the World.<b>Materials and methods:</b> Protocols of many different domestic and foreign health centers where compared, showing many methodological differences. Selection of literature for analysis was made according to PRISMA algorithm recommendations. Twenty research papers were chosen for review process.<b>Discussion:</b> In many papers we found lack of data regarding methodology of performed tests. Many authors indicate difficulties in comparing results, especially if publication lacks basic technical information. Despite that if right method is applied, results can be compared. In literature only one level of material presentation in test is prevalent. Speech audiometry is significant in exploring connections between multiple pre-op and post-op prognostic aspects of cochlear implantation.<b>Conclusions:</b> Because of variability in presentation and reporting of CI patients outcomes, consensus is needed in area of system facilitating comparison of research results. This may provide simple solution for accurate analysis and choosing right set of data. Schematic of presentation of audiological data in authors health center was proposed as example.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估人工耳蜗患者听力康复进展的语音识别和语音测听参数。综述论文。
<b>引言:</b>言语测听是听力学以及人工耳蜗植入者性能评估中成熟且常用的测试方法。人工耳蜗植入适应症的不断扩大,迫使人们使用更精细的方法来评估和预测听力康复的结果。b> 目的:</b> 本文旨在分析波兰和全球人工耳蜗植入患者的语言测听和其他语言智能测试的使用情况及其结果报告。根据 PRISMA 算法建议选择文献进行分析。<b>讨论:</b>在许多论文中,我们发现缺乏有关测试方法的数据。许多作者表示很难对结果进行比较,尤其是在缺乏基本技术信息的情况下。尽管如此,如果方法正确,结果还是可以比较的。在文献中,测试中的材料展示只有一个层次。言语测听对于探索人工耳蜗植入术前术后多个预后方面之间的联系具有重要意义。<b>结论:</b> 由于对人工耳蜗植入患者结果的表述和报告存在差异,因此需要在便于比较研究结果的系统领域达成共识。这可以为准确分析和选择正确的数据集提供简单的解决方案。本文以作者健康中心的听力数据展示示意图为例进行说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The impact of using FM systems on phonemic awareness in children with central auditory processing disorders (APD). Patient Satisfaction after Open Rhinoseptoplasty: What Do the Statistics Say? Preoperative serum 25(OH)D status and its correlation with an early endoscopic sinus surgery outcome and chronic rhinosinusitis severity. Revision parotidectomy - analysis of indications for the procedure and treatment results based on 10 years of follow-up in a single center. Rostral fluid shifts and other mechanisms of interaction between obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure - a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1