Empathy or sympathy: a necessary distinction?

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q4 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES History of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1177/0957154X241261031
Ivana S Marková
{"title":"Empathy or sympathy: a necessary distinction?","authors":"Ivana S Marková","doi":"10.1177/0957154X241261031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As a deeply hybrid discipline, psychiatry demands research that tackles the concepts constituting it and its objects. This is an essential prerequisite to empirical studies, the validity of which are directly dependent on a clear understanding of the underlying concepts. Empathy and sympathy are concepts used variably and inconsistently in clinical practice and research, with ensuing uncertainties around their role and meaning. Using a historical epistemology approach, this paper compares these concepts by examining the structures, intersections, stabilities and factors that shape them. It shows that neither concept is invariant, and, despite overlap, the concepts are essentially different, underpinned by different assumptions, holding different functions and capturing different phenomena. In turn, such differences require apposite approaches to their empirical study.</p>","PeriodicalId":45965,"journal":{"name":"History of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X241261031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a deeply hybrid discipline, psychiatry demands research that tackles the concepts constituting it and its objects. This is an essential prerequisite to empirical studies, the validity of which are directly dependent on a clear understanding of the underlying concepts. Empathy and sympathy are concepts used variably and inconsistently in clinical practice and research, with ensuing uncertainties around their role and meaning. Using a historical epistemology approach, this paper compares these concepts by examining the structures, intersections, stabilities and factors that shape them. It shows that neither concept is invariant, and, despite overlap, the concepts are essentially different, underpinned by different assumptions, holding different functions and capturing different phenomena. In turn, such differences require apposite approaches to their empirical study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同理心还是同情心:必要的区别?
作为一门深度混合的学科,精神病学的研究需要解决构成它的概念及其对象。这是实证研究的必要前提,而实证研究的有效性直接取决于对基本概念的清晰理解。移情和同情这两个概念在临床实践和研究中的使用各不相同,也不一致,因此其作用和意义也存在不确定性。本文采用历史认识论的方法,通过研究形成这两个概念的结构、交叉点、稳定性和因素,对它们进行了比较。结果表明,这两个概念都不是不变的,尽管有重叠,但本质上是不同的,以不同的假设为基础,具有不同的功能,捕捉不同的现象。反过来,这种差异也要求对其进行相应的实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: History of Psychiatry publishes research articles, analysis and information across the entire field of the history of mental illness and the forms of medicine, psychiatry, cultural response and social policy which have evolved to understand and treat it. It covers all periods of history up to the present day, and all nations and cultures.
期刊最新文献
The saga of James Lucett and the process for curing insanity, Part 2 (1814-38): 'Insanity cured'. Human radiation for medicine, spiritism and hypnosis in Argentina: scientific controversies around vital radiations (1880-1930). Cheerfulness in the history of psychiatry. Marcel Réja and theatre therapy. Phrenitis and the pathology of the mind in western medical thought (fifth century BCE to twentieth century cE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1