Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Patient-Centered, Nonphysician Led Self-Monitoring Blood Pressure Program in a Rural Federally Qualified Health Center.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Management and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000001937
Magali Sanchez, KeliAnne K Hara-Hubbard, Bárbara Baquero
{"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Patient-Centered, Nonphysician Led Self-Monitoring Blood Pressure Program in a Rural Federally Qualified Health Center.","authors":"Magali Sanchez, KeliAnne K Hara-Hubbard, Bárbara Baquero","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000001937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Uncontrolled hypertension can lead to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. Self-monitoring blood pressure (SMBP) programs have been associated with blood pressure (BP) reduction, particularly among rural, minority, and low-income individuals. There is limited literature about nonphysician SMBP programs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of an SMBP program designed to engage nonphysician team members in hypertension management within a federally qualified health center (FQHC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Self-monitoring blood pressure program activities were implemented using a Plan, Do, Study, Act model. The University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center evaluated processes and patient-level outcomes in a mixed-methods design. Quantitative analysis examined clinical outcomes related to hypertension, and qualitative analysis relied on interviews with clinical staff examining program implementation, adoption, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Family Health Centers (FHCs), a FQHC located in rural Washington, serving medically underserved populations.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two hundred five active SMBP patients out of 2600 adult patients (over 18 years old) who had a diagnosis of hypertension within the last 12 months.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were given a BP cuff to log their daily BP. Patients met with community health workers (CHWs) and medical staff to review logs and set self-management goals over 3 to 4 months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Controlled BP measurements and factors to implementation and sustainment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Facilitators to implementation included expanded telehealth reimbursement during the COVID-19 pandemic, integration of CHWs, and linguistically adapted resources. Barriers included a lack of reimbursement for nonphysician time and BP monitors. Quantitative results demonstrated an effort to reach minoritized populations but did not show an improvement in BP outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family Health Center implemented an SMBP program adapted to meet the linguistic and social needs of their patients. The successful integration of CHWs and the need for reimbursement policies to support SMBP programs were key factors for implementation and sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":"30 ","pages":"S167-S174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Uncontrolled hypertension can lead to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. Self-monitoring blood pressure (SMBP) programs have been associated with blood pressure (BP) reduction, particularly among rural, minority, and low-income individuals. There is limited literature about nonphysician SMBP programs.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of an SMBP program designed to engage nonphysician team members in hypertension management within a federally qualified health center (FQHC).

Design: Self-monitoring blood pressure program activities were implemented using a Plan, Do, Study, Act model. The University of Washington Health Promotion Research Center evaluated processes and patient-level outcomes in a mixed-methods design. Quantitative analysis examined clinical outcomes related to hypertension, and qualitative analysis relied on interviews with clinical staff examining program implementation, adoption, and sustainability.

Setting: Family Health Centers (FHCs), a FQHC located in rural Washington, serving medically underserved populations.

Participants: Two hundred five active SMBP patients out of 2600 adult patients (over 18 years old) who had a diagnosis of hypertension within the last 12 months.

Intervention: Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were given a BP cuff to log their daily BP. Patients met with community health workers (CHWs) and medical staff to review logs and set self-management goals over 3 to 4 months.

Main outcome measure: Controlled BP measurements and factors to implementation and sustainment.

Results: Facilitators to implementation included expanded telehealth reimbursement during the COVID-19 pandemic, integration of CHWs, and linguistically adapted resources. Barriers included a lack of reimbursement for nonphysician time and BP monitors. Quantitative results demonstrated an effort to reach minoritized populations but did not show an improvement in BP outcomes.

Conclusions: Family Health Center implemented an SMBP program adapted to meet the linguistic and social needs of their patients. The successful integration of CHWs and the need for reimbursement policies to support SMBP programs were key factors for implementation and sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估以患者为中心、非医生主导的自我监测血压计划在农村联邦合格卫生中心的效果。
背景:高血压得不到控制会导致罹患心血管疾病、心肌梗塞、中风或死亡的风险增加。自我监测血压(SMBP)计划与降低血压(BP)有关,特别是在农村、少数民族和低收入人群中。有关非医师自我血压监测计划的文献资料有限:评估联邦合格医疗中心(FQHC)内非医师团队成员参与高血压管理的自我监测血压计划的有效性:设计:采用 "计划、实施、研究、行动 "模式开展自我监测血压计划活动。华盛顿大学健康促进研究中心以混合方法设计评估了过程和患者层面的结果。定量分析检查了与高血压相关的临床结果,定性分析则依赖于对临床工作人员的访谈,检查项目的实施、采用和可持续性:家庭健康中心(FHCs),位于华盛顿州农村地区的一家 FQHC,为医疗服务不足的人群提供服务:在过去 12 个月内被诊断出患有高血压的 2600 名成年患者(18 岁以上)中,有 255 名活跃的 SMBP 患者:干预措施:向未得到控制的高血压患者发放血压计,记录他们的每日血压。患者与社区卫生工作者(CHWs)和医务人员会面,在3至4个月内查看记录并设定自我管理目标:主要结果测量:控制血压测量结果以及实施和维持的因素:结果:实施的促进因素包括 COVID-19 大流行期间远程医疗报销范围的扩大、社区保健员的融入以及语言适应性资源。障碍包括缺乏对非医生时间和血压计的补偿。定量结果表明,该中心努力覆盖少数群体,但并未显示血压结果有所改善:家庭健康中心实施了一项 SMBP 计划,以满足患者的语言和社会需求。CHW的成功整合以及支持SMBP项目的报销政策需求是项目实施和可持续发展的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Criticality and Frequency of Tasks by the Public Health Workforce, 2022. Real-Time Dashboard for Identifying Overdose Touchpoints in Indiana. Assessing Facility Readiness to Provide Equitable Birthing Care in New York State: A Baseline Survey. Training the Next Generation of Local Public Health Leaders: A Case Study of Community Health Organizers in Pennsylvania. Maintaining and Improving Virtual Call Centers for Public Health: The CUNY Recovery Corps Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1