"Making Space for More People, More Perspectives, and More Ideas": How Medical Education Journal Editors View Their Role in Capacity Building.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005826
Jeffrey J H Cheung, Dorene F Balmer, S Beth Bierer, Anna T Cianciolo
{"title":"\"Making Space for More People, More Perspectives, and More Ideas\": How Medical Education Journal Editors View Their Role in Capacity Building.","authors":"Jeffrey J H Cheung, Dorene F Balmer, S Beth Bierer, Anna T Cianciolo","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medical education journal editors work to improve scholarly rigor and expand access to scholarship. How editors conceptualize these dual roles is unknown and holds implications for the kinds of scholarship that are valued and made visible through publication. The authors applied the concept of capacity building to examine how medical education journal editors conceptualize and operationalize capacity building and to identify the contextual factors that support or constrain these efforts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using a reflexive thematic approach, the authors interviewed 13 editors of 11 medical education journals between February 2022 and March 2023. Data collection and analyses were performed iteratively. Interview transcripts were coded by 2 authors to generate initial codes, which were then refined by the research team until final themes were created.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Editors viewed capacity building \"making space\" for people and perspectives. Making space for people included efforts to support editors and reviewers, offer feedback to authors, and engage with readers. Making space for perspectives included efforts to promote discussion on diversity and inclusion and to introduce ideas perceived to advance the field. How editors made space was shaped by a journal's ecosystem, including local features unique to each journal (e.g., aims, scope, readership) and system-level factors that influenced all journals (e.g., English as the language of science, academic promotion and tenure).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although medical education journal editors' capacity-building work will inevitably guide future scholars and scholarship, their work should be considered in the context of a larger ecosystem, including such features as institutional academies for scholarship and promotion and tenure policies. Improving rigor and expanding access will require clarifying how editors' approach and understand capacity building to advance as a field. Future work should clarify how individual journals' capacity-building efforts can be facilitated and how journals can collectively reimagine spaces for knowledge-building conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Medical education journal editors work to improve scholarly rigor and expand access to scholarship. How editors conceptualize these dual roles is unknown and holds implications for the kinds of scholarship that are valued and made visible through publication. The authors applied the concept of capacity building to examine how medical education journal editors conceptualize and operationalize capacity building and to identify the contextual factors that support or constrain these efforts.

Method: Using a reflexive thematic approach, the authors interviewed 13 editors of 11 medical education journals between February 2022 and March 2023. Data collection and analyses were performed iteratively. Interview transcripts were coded by 2 authors to generate initial codes, which were then refined by the research team until final themes were created.

Results: Editors viewed capacity building "making space" for people and perspectives. Making space for people included efforts to support editors and reviewers, offer feedback to authors, and engage with readers. Making space for perspectives included efforts to promote discussion on diversity and inclusion and to introduce ideas perceived to advance the field. How editors made space was shaped by a journal's ecosystem, including local features unique to each journal (e.g., aims, scope, readership) and system-level factors that influenced all journals (e.g., English as the language of science, academic promotion and tenure).

Conclusions: Although medical education journal editors' capacity-building work will inevitably guide future scholars and scholarship, their work should be considered in the context of a larger ecosystem, including such features as institutional academies for scholarship and promotion and tenure policies. Improving rigor and expanding access will require clarifying how editors' approach and understand capacity building to advance as a field. Future work should clarify how individual journals' capacity-building efforts can be facilitated and how journals can collectively reimagine spaces for knowledge-building conversations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"为更多的人、更多的观点和更多的想法留出空间":医学教育》杂志编辑如何看待自己在能力建设中的作用。
目的:医学教育期刊编辑致力于提高学术严谨性,扩大学术成果的获取途径。编辑们是如何将这双重角色概念化的尚不可知,而这对通过出版得到重视和显现的学术类型具有影响。作者运用能力建设的概念来研究医学教育期刊编辑如何将能力建设概念化和操作化,并确定支持或限制这些努力的背景因素:作者在2022年2月至2023年3月期间采用反思性主题方法,对11种医学教育期刊的13位编辑进行了访谈。数据收集和分析是反复进行的。访谈记录由两位作者进行编码,以产生初步编码,然后由研究小组进行完善,直至形成最终主题:编辑们认为能力建设是为人和观点 "创造空间"。为人留出空间包括为编辑和审稿人提供支持、为作者提供反馈以及与读者互动。为观点留出空间包括努力促进关于多样性和包容性的讨论,以及引入被认为能推动该领域发展的观点。编辑如何创造空间受期刊生态系统的影响,包括每种期刊独有的地方特征(如目标、范围、读者群)和影响所有期刊的系统级因素(如英语作为科学语言、学术晋升和终身职位):尽管医学教育期刊编辑的能力建设工作将不可避免地为未来的学者和学术研究提供指导,但他们的工作应在更大的生态系统背景下加以考虑,包括学术研究机构、晋升和终身教职政策等特征。要提高严谨性和扩大使用范围,就需要明确编辑如何对待和理解能力建设,以推动这一领域的发展。未来的工作应明确如何促进单个期刊的能力建设工作,以及期刊如何共同重新构想知识建设对话的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
In Reply to McBride and Walsh. A Critical Look at Racism in the Clinical Learning Environment and the Erasure of DEI Efforts. Championing Civility in the Clinical Learning Environment: Evaluation of a Novel Training Program. Simulation vs RISE UP: A Comparative Study of Approaches for Teaching Emergency Medicine Trainees How to Manage Microaggressions. The Potential of Using ChatGPT-4 Vision for Detecting Image Manipulation in Academic Medicine Articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1