Exploring the concepts of consumer feedback systems for occupational therapy student learning during practice placements: A scoping review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Australian Occupational Therapy Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1111/1440-1630.12984
Thomas Bevitt, Robert B Pereira, Rachel Bacon, Stephen Isbel
{"title":"Exploring the concepts of consumer feedback systems for occupational therapy student learning during practice placements: A scoping review.","authors":"Thomas Bevitt, Robert B Pereira, Rachel Bacon, Stephen Isbel","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.12984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Consumer contribution to occupational therapy student learning is mandated for Australian educational programs. However, there is limited research about how consumers contribute to student learning during practice placements. A scoping review was completed to explore the concepts of existing feedback systems for consumers to authentically contribute to student learning during practice placements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched for all articles up to and including July 2023. All publications were included if they described and investigated authentic contribution to student learning during a practice placement experience. Data from the results and discussion sections of the papers were transformed into qualitative data and thematically analysed to develop a conceptual understanding of consumer feedback systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-six papers met the eligibility criteria. Most articles originated from Medicine (30%) and Nursing (45%) education. Feedback systems were primarily designed to critique student communication and professional behaviours using a variety of standardised and non-standardised methods. Five interconnected themes were created that addressed the concepts of consumer feedback systems. The themes were (1) creating value specific for each stakeholder is essential, (2) preparation is required and nuanced; (3) consumers do engage and provide critical feedback when the system is supportive of all stakeholders; (4) gathering approaches need to be responsive to the diversity of practice and learning; (5) processing feedback with a trusted mentor is critical for learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consumers, academics, practice educators, and students recognised that consumers have an important role in contributing to student learning during practice placements. Future consumer feedback systems need to be co-produced to create an optimal mode for consumers to authentically contribute to student learning constructively and safely.</p><p><strong>Consumer and community involvement: </strong>A consumer consultant was a member of the advisory panel for the larger research project that this review is part of and provided advice to the research team at all stages of the project.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In Australia, occupational therapy training programs require input from consumers to help students learn. However, there is not much research on how consumers help occupational therapy students during their practical training. We did a review to see how existing feedback systems let consumers genuinely help students during their training. We searched five databases for research up to July 2023. We included research that talked about how consumers help all health students learn during practical training. We found 46 articles, mostly from Medicine and Nursing education. We analysed them to understand how consumer feedback systems work and found five main themes: (1) making sure everyone involved gets value out of it, (2) being prepared is important, (3) consumers give useful feedback when the system supports everyone involved, (4) different approaches are needed because practices and learning vary, and (5) discussing feedback with other people helps students learn. Current feedback systems mostly focused on how students communicate and behave professionally. Consumers, educators, and students all agree that consumers play a vital role in helping students learn during practical training. In the future, we need to work together to make feedback systems that let consumers help students in the best way possible, making sure it is constructive and safe for everyone.</p>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Consumer contribution to occupational therapy student learning is mandated for Australian educational programs. However, there is limited research about how consumers contribute to student learning during practice placements. A scoping review was completed to explore the concepts of existing feedback systems for consumers to authentically contribute to student learning during practice placements.

Methods: Five databases were searched for all articles up to and including July 2023. All publications were included if they described and investigated authentic contribution to student learning during a practice placement experience. Data from the results and discussion sections of the papers were transformed into qualitative data and thematically analysed to develop a conceptual understanding of consumer feedback systems.

Results: Forty-six papers met the eligibility criteria. Most articles originated from Medicine (30%) and Nursing (45%) education. Feedback systems were primarily designed to critique student communication and professional behaviours using a variety of standardised and non-standardised methods. Five interconnected themes were created that addressed the concepts of consumer feedback systems. The themes were (1) creating value specific for each stakeholder is essential, (2) preparation is required and nuanced; (3) consumers do engage and provide critical feedback when the system is supportive of all stakeholders; (4) gathering approaches need to be responsive to the diversity of practice and learning; (5) processing feedback with a trusted mentor is critical for learning.

Conclusions: Consumers, academics, practice educators, and students recognised that consumers have an important role in contributing to student learning during practice placements. Future consumer feedback systems need to be co-produced to create an optimal mode for consumers to authentically contribute to student learning constructively and safely.

Consumer and community involvement: A consumer consultant was a member of the advisory panel for the larger research project that this review is part of and provided advice to the research team at all stages of the project.

Plain language summary: In Australia, occupational therapy training programs require input from consumers to help students learn. However, there is not much research on how consumers help occupational therapy students during their practical training. We did a review to see how existing feedback systems let consumers genuinely help students during their training. We searched five databases for research up to July 2023. We included research that talked about how consumers help all health students learn during practical training. We found 46 articles, mostly from Medicine and Nursing education. We analysed them to understand how consumer feedback systems work and found five main themes: (1) making sure everyone involved gets value out of it, (2) being prepared is important, (3) consumers give useful feedback when the system supports everyone involved, (4) different approaches are needed because practices and learning vary, and (5) discussing feedback with other people helps students learn. Current feedback systems mostly focused on how students communicate and behave professionally. Consumers, educators, and students all agree that consumers play a vital role in helping students learn during practical training. In the future, we need to work together to make feedback systems that let consumers help students in the best way possible, making sure it is constructive and safe for everyone.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索消费者反馈系统的概念,促进职业治疗学生在实习期间的学习:范围综述。
导言:澳大利亚教育计划规定,消费者必须为职业治疗学生的学习做出贡献。然而,有关消费者如何在实习期间促进学生学习的研究却十分有限。我们完成了一项范围审查,以探索现有反馈系统的概念,让消费者在实习期间为学生的学习做出真实的贡献:方法:在五个数据库中搜索了截至 2023 年 7 月(含 2023 年 7 月)的所有文章。所有对学生在实习期间的学习做出真实贡献进行描述和调查的出版物均被收录。将论文结果和讨论部分的数据转化为定性数据,并进行主题分析,以形成对消费者反馈系统的概念性理解:46篇论文符合资格标准。大多数文章来自医学(30%)和护理学(45%)教育领域。反馈系统的主要设计目的是利用各种标准化和非标准化方法对学生的交流和专业行为进行批评。针对消费者反馈系统的概念,提出了五个相互关联的主题。这些主题是:(1) 为每个利益相关者创造特定价值至关重要;(2) 需要做好细致入微的准备;(3) 当系统支持所有利益相关者时,消费者会参与并提供关键反馈;(4) 收集方法需要适应实践和学习的多样性;(5) 与值得信赖的导师一起处理反馈对学习至关重要:消费者、学者、实践教育者和学生都认识到,消费者在促进学生实践学习方面发挥着重要作用。未来的消费者反馈系统需要共同建立,以创建一个最佳模式,让消费者真实地、建设性地、安全地为学生的学习做出贡献:消费者和社区参与:一名消费者顾问是本评论所涉及的大型研究项目顾问小组的成员,并在项目的各个阶段为研究团队提供建议。语言简洁:在澳大利亚,职业治疗培训项目需要消费者的投入来帮助学生学习。然而,关于消费者如何帮助职业治疗专业学生进行实践培训的研究并不多。我们对现有的反馈系统进行了审查,以了解消费者如何在培训期间真正帮助学生。我们在五个数据库中搜索了截至 2023 年 7 月的研究。我们收录了有关消费者如何帮助所有健康专业学生在实训期间学习的研究。我们找到了 46 篇文章,大部分来自医学和护理教育领域。我们对这些文章进行了分析,以了解消费者反馈系统是如何工作的,并发现了五大主题:(1)确保每个参与其中的人都能从中获得价值;(2)做好准备很重要;(3)当系统支持每个参与其中的人时,消费者就会给出有用的反馈;(4)需要采用不同的方法,因为实践和学习各不相同;(5)与其他人讨论反馈有助于学生学习。目前的反馈系统主要关注学生如何进行专业交流和行为。消费者、教育者和学生都认为,消费者在帮助学生在实训中学习方面起着至关重要的作用。今后,我们需要共同努力,使反馈系统能够让消费者以最佳方式帮助学生,确保对每个人都具有建设性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
期刊最新文献
Driving a motor vehicle and living with a mental health condition: The personal and professional experiences of consumer lived experience staff. Interoception and its application to paediatric occupational therapy: A scoping review. The experiences of rural generalist occupational therapists in provision of palliative care in rural, regional, and remote Australia: A phenomenological inquiry. The responsiveness and clinical utility of the Australian therapy outcome measure for indigenous clients. Online interventions for the mental health and well-being of parents of children with additional needs: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1