Sensorimotor Challenges in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Theoretically-Oriented Review.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1177/00187208241263684
Christopher L Hewitson, Matthew J Crossley, John Cartmill, David M Kaplan
{"title":"Sensorimotor Challenges in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Theoretically-Oriented Review.","authors":"Christopher L Hewitson, Matthew J Crossley, John Cartmill, David M Kaplan","doi":"10.1177/00187208241263684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review surveys the literature on sensorimotor challenges impacting performance in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery (MIS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its well-known benefits for patients, achieving proficiency in MIS can be challenging for surgeons due to many factors including altered visual perspectives and fulcrum effects in instrument handling. Research on these and other sensorimotor challenges has been hindered by imprecise terminology and the lack of a unified theoretical framework to guide research questions in the field.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a systematic survey of the MIS literature, focusing on studies investigating sensorimotor challenges affecting laparoscopic performance. To provide a common foundation for cross-study comparisons, we propose a standardized taxonomy that distinguishes between different experimental paradigms used in the literature. We then show how the computational motor learning perspective provides a unifying theoretical framework for the field that can facilitate progress and motivate future research along clearer, hypothesis-driven lines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey identified diverse sensorimotor perturbations in MIS, which can be effectively categorized according to our proposed taxonomy. Studies investigating monitor-, camera-, and tool-based perturbations were systematically analyzed, elucidating their impact on surgical performance. We also show how the computational motor learning perspective provides deeper insights and potential strategies to mitigate challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sensorimotor challenges significantly impact MIS, necessitating a systematic, empirically informed approach. Our proposed taxonomy and theoretical framework shed light on the complexities involved, paving the way for more structured research and targeted training approaches to enhance surgical proficiency.</p><p><strong>Application: </strong>Understanding the sensorimotor challenges inherent to MIS can guide the design of improved training curricula and inform the configuration of setups in the operating room to enhance surgeon performance and ultimately patient outcomes. This review offers key insights for surgeons, educators, and researchers in surgical performance and technology development.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208241263684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review surveys the literature on sensorimotor challenges impacting performance in laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery (MIS).

Background: Despite its well-known benefits for patients, achieving proficiency in MIS can be challenging for surgeons due to many factors including altered visual perspectives and fulcrum effects in instrument handling. Research on these and other sensorimotor challenges has been hindered by imprecise terminology and the lack of a unified theoretical framework to guide research questions in the field.

Method: We conducted a systematic survey of the MIS literature, focusing on studies investigating sensorimotor challenges affecting laparoscopic performance. To provide a common foundation for cross-study comparisons, we propose a standardized taxonomy that distinguishes between different experimental paradigms used in the literature. We then show how the computational motor learning perspective provides a unifying theoretical framework for the field that can facilitate progress and motivate future research along clearer, hypothesis-driven lines.

Results: The survey identified diverse sensorimotor perturbations in MIS, which can be effectively categorized according to our proposed taxonomy. Studies investigating monitor-, camera-, and tool-based perturbations were systematically analyzed, elucidating their impact on surgical performance. We also show how the computational motor learning perspective provides deeper insights and potential strategies to mitigate challenges.

Conclusion: Sensorimotor challenges significantly impact MIS, necessitating a systematic, empirically informed approach. Our proposed taxonomy and theoretical framework shed light on the complexities involved, paving the way for more structured research and targeted training approaches to enhance surgical proficiency.

Application: Understanding the sensorimotor challenges inherent to MIS can guide the design of improved training curricula and inform the configuration of setups in the operating room to enhance surgeon performance and ultimately patient outcomes. This review offers key insights for surgeons, educators, and researchers in surgical performance and technology development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创手术中的感觉运动挑战:以理论为导向的综述。
目的:本综述调查了影响腹腔镜微创手术(MIS)表现的感觉运动挑战的文献:本综述调查了有关影响腹腔镜微创手术(MIS)表现的感觉运动挑战的文献:背景:尽管腹腔镜微创手术对患者的益处众所周知,但由于许多因素,包括器械操作中视觉视角的改变和支点效应,要熟练掌握腹腔镜微创手术对外科医生来说是一项挑战。由于术语不准确以及缺乏统一的理论框架来指导该领域的研究问题,有关这些及其他感觉运动挑战的研究一直受到阻碍:我们对管理信息系统文献进行了系统调查,重点关注影响腹腔镜手术表现的感觉运动挑战研究。为了给跨研究比较提供一个共同的基础,我们提出了一个标准化的分类标准,以区分文献中使用的不同实验范式。然后,我们展示了计算运动学习的观点如何为该领域提供了一个统一的理论框架,从而促进该领域的进展,并激励未来的研究沿着更清晰、假设驱动的路线前进:调查发现,在 MIS 中存在多种传感器运动干扰,可根据我们提出的分类法进行有效分类。我们系统分析了调查监视器、摄像头和工具干扰的研究,阐明了它们对手术表现的影响。我们还展示了计算运动学习观点如何提供更深入的见解和潜在的策略来缓解挑战:结论:感知运动挑战对 MIS 有着重大影响,因此有必要采用一种系统的、以经验为依据的方法。我们提出的分类法和理论框架揭示了其中的复杂性,为更有条理的研究和有针对性的培训方法铺平了道路,从而提高手术熟练程度:应用:了解 MIS 所固有的感觉运动挑战可以指导改进培训课程的设计,并为手术室的设置提供信息,从而提高外科医生的表现,最终改善患者的预后。这篇综述为外科医生、教育工作者以及手术性能和技术开发方面的研究人员提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Road Users Fail to Appreciate the Special Optical Properties of Retroreflective Materials. Effectiveness of Safe Patient Handling Equipment and Techniques: A Review of Biomechanical Studies. Changes in Neck and Shoulder Muscles Fatigue Threshold When Using a Passive Head/Neck Supporting Exoskeleton During Repetitive Overhead Tasks. The Role of State and Trait Self-Control on the Sustained Attention to Response Task. Improving Social Bot Detection Through Aid and Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1