Advocacy for Equitable Access to Nature and Outdoor Recreation.

Gina K Alexander, Vicki Brooks, Tammie S Williams
{"title":"Advocacy for Equitable Access to Nature and Outdoor Recreation.","authors":"Gina K Alexander, Vicki Brooks, Tammie S Williams","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240424-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent research highlights disparities in access to nature and green space, a determinant of mental and physical health. The aim of this report is to describe the process of park auditing as an innovation in nursing education.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Teams of baccalaureate nursing students used a practice guideline and park auditing tool to examine the amenities of recreational parks and green space in an urban metroplex in the southern United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through data collection and analysis, nursing students captured key indicators of quality and accessibility of 50 urban parks. The findings form the basis for stakeholder recommendations for advocacy to ensure equitable access to green space.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nursing students identified priorities for advocacy to promote park improvements through community-academic-practice partnerships designed to increase outdoor recreation and nature conservation among community members. These experiences reinforced the importance of advocacy with community stakeholders to cocreate strategies for equitable access to nature. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ.</i> 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240424-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent research highlights disparities in access to nature and green space, a determinant of mental and physical health. The aim of this report is to describe the process of park auditing as an innovation in nursing education.

Method: Teams of baccalaureate nursing students used a practice guideline and park auditing tool to examine the amenities of recreational parks and green space in an urban metroplex in the southern United States.

Results: Through data collection and analysis, nursing students captured key indicators of quality and accessibility of 50 urban parks. The findings form the basis for stakeholder recommendations for advocacy to ensure equitable access to green space.

Conclusion: Nursing students identified priorities for advocacy to promote park improvements through community-academic-practice partnerships designed to increase outdoor recreation and nature conservation among community members. These experiences reinforced the importance of advocacy with community stakeholders to cocreate strategies for equitable access to nature. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倡导公平享受自然和户外休闲。
背景:最近的研究突显了在接触自然和绿色空间方面存在的差距,这是身心健康的一个决定因素。本报告旨在介绍作为护理教育创新的公园审核过程:方法:由护理专业本科学生组成的小组使用实践指南和公园审核工具,对美国南部一个城市大都会区的休闲公园和绿地的设施进行检查:结果:通过数据收集和分析,护理专业学生掌握了 50 个城市公园的质量和可达性的关键指标。研究结果为利益相关者提出宣传建议奠定了基础,以确保公平使用绿地:护理专业学生确定了宣传工作的重点,通过社区-学术-实践合作伙伴关系促进公园的改善,旨在增加社区成员的户外休闲和自然保护。这些经验强化了与社区利益相关者共同制定战略,倡导公平利用自然的重要性。[J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX-XXX.].
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fulbright as Opportunity for U.S. Nursing Educators and International Nursing Schools. Outcomes of Concept-Based Curricula: An Integrative Review. Meeting Quality Improvement Learning Outcomes: Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle. A Multimodal Learning Approach in an Undergraduate Palliative Care Nursing Unit of Study. Adopting Optimal Statistical Practices: Reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1