{"title":"Hypnotics on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity and Endotypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ludovico Messineo, Scott A Sands, Gonzalo Labarca","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202403-0501OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Low arousal threshold and poor muscle responsiveness are common determinants of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Hypnotics were hypothesized as an alternative OSA treatment via raising the arousal threshold and possibly genioglossus responsiveness. <b>Objectives:</b> To examine the effect of common hypnotics on arousal threshold, OSA severity, and genioglossus responsiveness. <b>Methods:</b> We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials, and we ran meta-analyses to determine the effect of oral hypnotics on arousal threshold, OSA severity, and genioglossus responsiveness. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to rate the quality of evidence (QoE). The association between post-treatment apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and arousal threshold percentage reductions was explored in individual patient data meta-analyses (overall sample and low arousal threshold subgroups). <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> On the basis of our analysis (27 studies; 25 for AHI, 11 for arousal threshold, 4 for genioglossus responsiveness), hypnotics minimally raised arousal threshold (mean difference [95% confidence interval], 2.7 [1.5, 3.8] cm H<sub>2</sub>O epiglottic pressure swings; moderate QoE) but did not change OSA severity (-1.4 [-3.5, 0.7] events/h; moderate QoE). Individual patient data meta-analysis (<i>N</i> = 114) showed no association between changes in arousal threshold and AHI, independent of arousal threshold subgrouping. However, people with very low arousal threshold or those who exhibited a 0-25% arousal threshold increase from placebo experienced the greatest, yet still modest, post-treatment AHI reductions (∼10%). Hypnotics did not affect genioglossus responsiveness (high QoE). <b>Conclusions:</b> Further research testing or clinical use of hypnotics as OSA alternative treatments should be discouraged, unless in the presence of comorbid insomnia or as part of combination therapy in individuals with very low arousal threshold.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1461-1474"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11716028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202403-0501OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: Low arousal threshold and poor muscle responsiveness are common determinants of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Hypnotics were hypothesized as an alternative OSA treatment via raising the arousal threshold and possibly genioglossus responsiveness. Objectives: To examine the effect of common hypnotics on arousal threshold, OSA severity, and genioglossus responsiveness. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials, and we ran meta-analyses to determine the effect of oral hypnotics on arousal threshold, OSA severity, and genioglossus responsiveness. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to rate the quality of evidence (QoE). The association between post-treatment apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and arousal threshold percentage reductions was explored in individual patient data meta-analyses (overall sample and low arousal threshold subgroups). Measurements and Main Results: On the basis of our analysis (27 studies; 25 for AHI, 11 for arousal threshold, 4 for genioglossus responsiveness), hypnotics minimally raised arousal threshold (mean difference [95% confidence interval], 2.7 [1.5, 3.8] cm H2O epiglottic pressure swings; moderate QoE) but did not change OSA severity (-1.4 [-3.5, 0.7] events/h; moderate QoE). Individual patient data meta-analysis (N = 114) showed no association between changes in arousal threshold and AHI, independent of arousal threshold subgrouping. However, people with very low arousal threshold or those who exhibited a 0-25% arousal threshold increase from placebo experienced the greatest, yet still modest, post-treatment AHI reductions (∼10%). Hypnotics did not affect genioglossus responsiveness (high QoE). Conclusions: Further research testing or clinical use of hypnotics as OSA alternative treatments should be discouraged, unless in the presence of comorbid insomnia or as part of combination therapy in individuals with very low arousal threshold.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.