Socioeconomic, Patient, and Hospital Determinants for the Utilization of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007107
Joshua M Bonsel, Hanish Kodali, Jashvant Poeran, Gouke J Bonsel
{"title":"Socioeconomic, Patient, and Hospital Determinants for the Utilization of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Total Joint Arthroplasty.","authors":"Joshua M Bonsel, Hanish Kodali, Jashvant Poeran, Gouke J Bonsel","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are associated with various improved outcomes in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), disparities in PNB utilization have been reported. This study assessed the importance of socioeconomic, demographic, clinical, and hospital determinants in explaining PNB utilization using the population-attributable risk (PAR) framework. Subsequently, we examined the association between PNB use and 3 secondary outcomes: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-defined complications, 90-day all-cause readmissions, and length of stay >3 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 52,926 THA and 94,795 TKA cases from the 5% 2012 to 2021 Medicare dataset. Mixed-effects logistic regression models measured the association between study variables and PNB utilization. Variables of interest were demographic (age, sex), clinical (outpatient setting, diagnosis, prior hospitalizations in the year before surgery, Deyo-Charlson index, obesity, (non)-opioid abuse, smoking), socioeconomic (neighborhood Social Deprivation Index, race and ethnicity) and hospital variables (beds, ownership, region, rurality, resident-to-bed ratio). The model was used for the calculation of variable-specific and variable category-specific PARs (presented in percentages), reflecting the proportion of variation in PNB use explained after eliminating variables (or groups of variables) of interest with all other factors held constant. Subsequently, regression models measured the association between PNB use and secondary outcomes. Associations are presented with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Socioeconomic and demographic variables accounted for only a small proportion of variation in PNB use (up to 3% and 7%, respectively). Clinical (THA: 46%; TKA: 34%) and hospital variables (THA: 31%; TKA: 22%) were the primary drivers of variation. In THA, variation by clinical variables was driven by increased PNB use in the inpatient setting (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.07-1.53]) and decreased use in patients with ≥2 prior hospitalizations (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.90]). Moreover, nonosteoarthritis diagnoses associated with reduced PNB utilization in THA (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.58-0.72]) and TKA (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.34-0.37]).In TKA, PNB use was subsequently associated with fewer complications (OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]) and less prolonged length of stay (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.95]); no association was found for readmissions (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93-1.03]). In THA, associations did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among THA and TKA patients on Medicare, large variations exist in the utilization of PNBs by clinical and hospital variables, while demographic and socioeconomic variables played a limited role. Given the consistent benefits of PNBs, particularly in TKA patients, more standardized provision may be warranted to mitigate the observed variation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":"675-686"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are associated with various improved outcomes in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), disparities in PNB utilization have been reported. This study assessed the importance of socioeconomic, demographic, clinical, and hospital determinants in explaining PNB utilization using the population-attributable risk (PAR) framework. Subsequently, we examined the association between PNB use and 3 secondary outcomes: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-defined complications, 90-day all-cause readmissions, and length of stay >3 days.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 52,926 THA and 94,795 TKA cases from the 5% 2012 to 2021 Medicare dataset. Mixed-effects logistic regression models measured the association between study variables and PNB utilization. Variables of interest were demographic (age, sex), clinical (outpatient setting, diagnosis, prior hospitalizations in the year before surgery, Deyo-Charlson index, obesity, (non)-opioid abuse, smoking), socioeconomic (neighborhood Social Deprivation Index, race and ethnicity) and hospital variables (beds, ownership, region, rurality, resident-to-bed ratio). The model was used for the calculation of variable-specific and variable category-specific PARs (presented in percentages), reflecting the proportion of variation in PNB use explained after eliminating variables (or groups of variables) of interest with all other factors held constant. Subsequently, regression models measured the association between PNB use and secondary outcomes. Associations are presented with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results: Socioeconomic and demographic variables accounted for only a small proportion of variation in PNB use (up to 3% and 7%, respectively). Clinical (THA: 46%; TKA: 34%) and hospital variables (THA: 31%; TKA: 22%) were the primary drivers of variation. In THA, variation by clinical variables was driven by increased PNB use in the inpatient setting (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.07-1.53]) and decreased use in patients with ≥2 prior hospitalizations (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.90]). Moreover, nonosteoarthritis diagnoses associated with reduced PNB utilization in THA (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.58-0.72]) and TKA (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.34-0.37]).In TKA, PNB use was subsequently associated with fewer complications (OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]) and less prolonged length of stay (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.95]); no association was found for readmissions (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93-1.03]). In THA, associations did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: Among THA and TKA patients on Medicare, large variations exist in the utilization of PNBs by clinical and hospital variables, while demographic and socioeconomic variables played a limited role. Given the consistent benefits of PNBs, particularly in TKA patients, more standardized provision may be warranted to mitigate the observed variation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全关节成形术中使用外周神经阻滞术的社会经济、患者和医院决定因素。
背景:虽然外周神经阻滞(PNB)与全髋或全膝关节置换术(THA/TKA)患者的各种预后改善有关,但也有报道称 PNB 使用率存在差异。本研究采用人口可归因风险(PAR)框架评估了社会经济、人口、临床和医院决定因素在解释 PNB 使用率方面的重要性。随后,我们研究了 PNB 使用与 3 个次要结果之间的关联:美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)定义的并发症、90 天全因再入院和住院时间超过 3 天:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2012年至2021年5%的医疗保险数据集中的52926例THA和94795例TKA病例。混合效应逻辑回归模型测量了研究变量与PNB使用率之间的关系。研究变量包括人口统计学变量(年龄、性别)、临床变量(门诊环境、诊断、术前一年的住院情况、Deyo-Charlson 指数、肥胖、(非)阿片类药物滥用、吸烟)、社会经济变量(社区社会贫困指数、种族和民族)和医院变量(床位、所有权、地区、乡村、居民与床位比)。该模型用于计算变量特异性 PAR 和变量类别特异性 PAR(以百分比表示),反映了在所有其他因素保持不变的情况下,剔除相关变量(或变量组)后所解释的 PNB 使用变异比例。随后,回归模型测量了 PNB 使用与次要结果之间的关联。相关性以几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(95% CI)表示:社会经济变量和人口统计学变量仅占 PNB 使用量变化的一小部分(分别高达 3% 和 7%)。临床变量(THA:46%;TKA:34%)和医院变量(THA:31%;TKA:22%)是造成差异的主要原因。在 THA 中,住院环境中 PNB 使用增加(OR,1.28 [95% CI,1.07-1.53]),而之前住院≥2 次的患者中 PNB 使用减少(OR,0.72 [95% CI,0.57-0.90]),这是临床变量导致差异的原因。此外,在 THA(OR,0.64 [95% CI,0.58-0.72])和 TKA(OR,0.35 [95% CI,0.34-0.37])中,非关节炎诊断与 PNB 使用减少相关。在 TKA 中,使用 PNB 与较少的并发症(OR,0.82 [95% CI,0.75-0.90])和较短的住院时间(OR,0.90 [95% CI,0.86-0.95])相关;与再入院(OR,0.98 [95% CI,0.93-1.03])没有关联。在 THA 中,相关性未达到统计学意义:结论:在医保的 THA 和 TKA 患者中,临床和医院变量对 PNBs 的使用存在很大差异,而人口统计学和社会经济变量的作用有限。鉴于 PNBs 的持续益处,尤其是对 TKA 患者的益处,可能需要更标准化的提供方式来减少观察到的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
期刊最新文献
Anesthetic Sevoflurane Induces Enlargement of Dendritic Spine Heads in Mouse Neurons via Tau-Dependent Mechanisms. Respiratory Depression Following Intraoperative Methadone: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Impact of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine Reversal on Postoperative Recovery Time in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Predictive Validity of Anesthesiologists' Quality of Clinical Supervision and Nurse Anesthetists' Work Habits Assessed by Their Associations With Operating Room Times. Socioeconomic, Patient, and Hospital Determinants for the Utilization of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Total Joint Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1