Comparing loss of p16 and MTAP expression in detecting CDKN2A homozygous deletion in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jnen/nlae076
M Adelita Vizcaino, Caterina Giannini, Rachael A Vaubel, Aivi T Nguyen, Jorge A Trejo-Lopez, Aditya Raghunathan, Sarah M Jenkins, Robert B Jenkins, Cinthya J Zepeda Mendoza
{"title":"Comparing loss of p16 and MTAP expression in detecting CDKN2A homozygous deletion in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.","authors":"M Adelita Vizcaino, Caterina Giannini, Rachael A Vaubel, Aivi T Nguyen, Jorge A Trejo-Lopez, Aditya Raghunathan, Sarah M Jenkins, Robert B Jenkins, Cinthya J Zepeda Mendoza","doi":"10.1093/jnen/nlae076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXAs) harbor CDKN2A homozygous deletion in >90% of cases, resulting in loss of p16 expression by immunohistochemistry. Considering the proximity of MTAP to CDKN2A and their frequent concurrent deletions, loss of MTAP expression may be a surrogate for CDKN2A homozygous deletion. We evaluated p16 and MTAP expression in 38 patient PXAs (CNS WHO grade 2: n = 23, 60.5%; grade 3: n = 15, 39.5%) with available chromosomal microarray data to determine whether MTAP can be utilized independently or in combination with p16 to predict CDKN2A status. CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP homozygous deletion were present in 37 (97.4%), 36 (94.7%), and 25 (65.8%) cases, respectively. Expression of p16 was lost in 35 (92.1%) cases, equivocal in one (2.6%), and failed in 2 (5.3%), while MTAP expression was lost in 27 (71.1%) cases, retained in 10 (26.3%), and equivocal in one (2.6%). This yielded a sensitivity of 94.6% for p16 and 73.0% for MTAP in detecting CDKN2A homozygous deletion through immunohistochemistry. MTAP expression was lost in the 2 cases with failed p16 staining (combined sensitivity of 100%). Our findings demonstrate that combined p16 and MTAP immunostains correctly detect CDKN2A homozygous deletion in PXA, while MTAP expression alone shows reduced sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16682,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"1003-1009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlae076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas (PXAs) harbor CDKN2A homozygous deletion in >90% of cases, resulting in loss of p16 expression by immunohistochemistry. Considering the proximity of MTAP to CDKN2A and their frequent concurrent deletions, loss of MTAP expression may be a surrogate for CDKN2A homozygous deletion. We evaluated p16 and MTAP expression in 38 patient PXAs (CNS WHO grade 2: n = 23, 60.5%; grade 3: n = 15, 39.5%) with available chromosomal microarray data to determine whether MTAP can be utilized independently or in combination with p16 to predict CDKN2A status. CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and MTAP homozygous deletion were present in 37 (97.4%), 36 (94.7%), and 25 (65.8%) cases, respectively. Expression of p16 was lost in 35 (92.1%) cases, equivocal in one (2.6%), and failed in 2 (5.3%), while MTAP expression was lost in 27 (71.1%) cases, retained in 10 (26.3%), and equivocal in one (2.6%). This yielded a sensitivity of 94.6% for p16 and 73.0% for MTAP in detecting CDKN2A homozygous deletion through immunohistochemistry. MTAP expression was lost in the 2 cases with failed p16 staining (combined sensitivity of 100%). Our findings demonstrate that combined p16 and MTAP immunostains correctly detect CDKN2A homozygous deletion in PXA, while MTAP expression alone shows reduced sensitivity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 p16 和 MTAP 表达缺失在检测多形性黄细胞瘤 CDKN2A 基因同源缺失中的作用。
多形性黄细胞瘤(PXAs)90%以上的病例存在CDKN2A同源染色体缺失,导致免疫组化结果显示p16表达缺失。考虑到MTAP与CDKN2A的邻近性及其频繁的并发缺失,MTAP表达的缺失可能是CDKN2A同源缺失的替代物。我们评估了 38 例有染色体芯片数据的 PXA 患者(中枢神经系统 WHO 2 级:n = 23,60.5%;3 级:n = 15,39.5%)的 p16 和 MTAP 表达情况,以确定 MTAP 是否可独立或与 p16 结合用于预测 CDKN2A 状态。37例(97.4%)、36例(94.7%)和25例(65.8%)分别存在CDKN2A、CDKN2B和MTAP同源缺失。35例(92.1%)p16表达缺失,1例(2.6%)表达不明确,2例(5.3%)表达失败;27例(71.1%)MTAP表达缺失,10例(26.3%)保留,1例(2.6%)表达不明确。因此,在通过免疫组化检测 CDKN2A 基因同源缺失时,p16 的灵敏度为 94.6%,MTAP 的灵敏度为 73.0%。在 p16 染色失败的 2 个病例中,MTAP 表达消失(综合灵敏度为 100%)。我们的研究结果表明,联合使用 p16 和 MTAP 免疫印迹可正确检测 PXA 中的 CDKN2A 基因同源缺失,而单独使用 MTAP 表达则会降低灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
118
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology is the official journal of the American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc. (AANP). The journal publishes peer-reviewed studies on neuropathology and experimental neuroscience, book reviews, letters, and Association news, covering a broad spectrum of fields in basic neuroscience with an emphasis on human neurological diseases. It is written by and for neuropathologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, pathologists, psychiatrists, and basic neuroscientists from around the world. Publication has been continuous since 1942.
期刊最新文献
Transdifferentiation of metastatic melanoma into cerebellar angiosarcoma. CTDSP2::GLI1 fusion in glioblastoma: A diagnostic challenge through tumor heterogeneity. Intracellular calcium dysregulation in heart and brain diseases: Insights from induced pluripotent stem cell studies. Cytoplasmic vacuolization and ectopic formation of perineuronal nets are characteristic pathologies of cytomegalic neurons in tuberous sclerosis. Comparing loss of p16 and MTAP expression in detecting CDKN2A homozygous deletion in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1