Illusory light drives pupil responses in primates.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1167/jov.24.7.14
Jean-Baptiste Durand, Sarah Marchand, Ilyas Nasres, Bruno Laeng, Vanessa De Castro
{"title":"Illusory light drives pupil responses in primates.","authors":"Jean-Baptiste Durand, Sarah Marchand, Ilyas Nasres, Bruno Laeng, Vanessa De Castro","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.7.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In humans, the eye pupils respond to both physical light sensed by the retina and mental representations of light produced by the brain. Notably, our pupils constrict when a visual stimulus is illusorily perceived brighter, even if retinal illumination is constant. However, it remains unclear whether such perceptual penetrability of pupil responses is an epiphenomenon unique to humans or whether it represents an adaptive mechanism shared with other animals to anticipate variations in retinal illumination between successive eye fixations. To address this issue, we measured the pupil responses of both humans and macaque monkeys exposed to three chromatic versions (cyan, magenta, and yellow) of the Asahi brightness illusion. We found that the stimuli illusorily perceived brighter or darker trigger differential pupil responses that are very similar in macaques and human participants. Additionally, we show that this phenomenon exhibits an analogous cyan bias in both primate species. Beyond evincing the macaque monkey as a relevant model to study the perceptual penetrability of pupil responses, our results suggest that this phenomenon is tuned to ecological conditions because the exposure to a \"bright cyan-bluish sky\" may be associated with increased risks of dazzle and retinal damages.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.7.14","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In humans, the eye pupils respond to both physical light sensed by the retina and mental representations of light produced by the brain. Notably, our pupils constrict when a visual stimulus is illusorily perceived brighter, even if retinal illumination is constant. However, it remains unclear whether such perceptual penetrability of pupil responses is an epiphenomenon unique to humans or whether it represents an adaptive mechanism shared with other animals to anticipate variations in retinal illumination between successive eye fixations. To address this issue, we measured the pupil responses of both humans and macaque monkeys exposed to three chromatic versions (cyan, magenta, and yellow) of the Asahi brightness illusion. We found that the stimuli illusorily perceived brighter or darker trigger differential pupil responses that are very similar in macaques and human participants. Additionally, we show that this phenomenon exhibits an analogous cyan bias in both primate species. Beyond evincing the macaque monkey as a relevant model to study the perceptual penetrability of pupil responses, our results suggest that this phenomenon is tuned to ecological conditions because the exposure to a "bright cyan-bluish sky" may be associated with increased risks of dazzle and retinal damages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚幻光线驱动灵长类动物的瞳孔反应。
人类的瞳孔会对视网膜感知到的物理光线和大脑产生的光线心理表征做出反应。值得注意的是,当视觉刺激被错误地认为更亮时,即使视网膜照度保持不变,我们的瞳孔也会收缩。然而,瞳孔反应的这种知觉穿透性是人类独有的表象,还是代表了一种与其他动物共享的适应机制,以预测连续定睛之间视网膜照度的变化,目前仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,我们测量了人类和猕猴对三种色度版本(青色、洋红色和黄色)的朝日亮度幻觉的瞳孔反应。我们发现,在猕猴和人类参与者中,被幻觉认为更亮或更暗的刺激会引发不同的瞳孔反应,这一点非常相似。此外,我们还发现这种现象在两种灵长类动物身上都表现出类似的青色偏差。除了证明猕猴是研究瞳孔反应知觉穿透性的相关模型外,我们的研究结果还表明,这种现象与生态条件有关,因为暴露于 "明亮的青蓝色天空 "可能会增加眩晕和视网膜损伤的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Individual differences reveal similarities in serial dependence effects across perceptual tasks, but not to oculomotor tasks. Investigating the relationship between subjective perception and unconscious feature integration. Binocular integration of chromatic and luminance signals. Deep convolutional neural networks are sensitive to face configuration. How the window of visibility varies around polar angle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1