Beth Ann Swan PhD, RN, FAAN, ANEF , Kim Dupree Jones PhD, FNP, FAAN , Rose Hayes RN, BSN, MA , Lalita Kaligotla Ed.D., MA, MBA , Carrie McDermott PhD, RN, APRN, ACNS-BC , Jeannie Rodriguez PhD, RN, PNP/PC , Linda McCauley PhD, RN, FAAN, FRCN
{"title":"Reject the “Practice Readiness Myth”: Ask if systems are ready for nursing graduates instead","authors":"Beth Ann Swan PhD, RN, FAAN, ANEF , Kim Dupree Jones PhD, FNP, FAAN , Rose Hayes RN, BSN, MA , Lalita Kaligotla Ed.D., MA, MBA , Carrie McDermott PhD, RN, APRN, ACNS-BC , Jeannie Rodriguez PhD, RN, PNP/PC , Linda McCauley PhD, RN, FAAN, FRCN","doi":"10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The nursing profession is engaged in robust national dialogue on how to implement competency-based education. This dialogue often conflates the concept of “competency-based education” with nursing “competence” or “practice readiness.” Our aim is to discuss the potential harms of conflating “competency-based education” with “competence” or “practice readiness.” This commentary explores the possible risks of issue conflation. Risks include (a) suggesting that nurses who have successfully obtained licensure are not “competent” or “ready to practice,” and (b) de-emphasizing the importance of safe and sustainable work environments for new graduate nurses. We discuss the need to separate conversations about “competency-based education” and “practice readiness”; the need to increase the clarity and specificity of discourse surrounding competency-based education; and the need for strategic alignment across academia and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54705,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Outlook","volume":"72 5","pages":"Article 102181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029655424000745","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The nursing profession is engaged in robust national dialogue on how to implement competency-based education. This dialogue often conflates the concept of “competency-based education” with nursing “competence” or “practice readiness.” Our aim is to discuss the potential harms of conflating “competency-based education” with “competence” or “practice readiness.” This commentary explores the possible risks of issue conflation. Risks include (a) suggesting that nurses who have successfully obtained licensure are not “competent” or “ready to practice,” and (b) de-emphasizing the importance of safe and sustainable work environments for new graduate nurses. We discuss the need to separate conversations about “competency-based education” and “practice readiness”; the need to increase the clarity and specificity of discourse surrounding competency-based education; and the need for strategic alignment across academia and practice.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Outlook, a bimonthly journal, provides innovative ideas for nursing leaders through peer-reviewed articles and timely reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in nursing practice, education, and research, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. Nursing Outlook is the official journal of the American Academy of Nursing and the Council for the Advancement of Nursing Science and supports their mission to serve the public and the nursing profession by advancing health policy and practice through the generation, synthesis, and dissemination of nursing knowledge. The journal is included in MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Journal Citation Reports published by Clarivate Analytics.