Responding to a nursing mandate in long-term care: A multi-modal pilot curriculum for bachelor of science in nursing students

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19089
Glenda R. Westmoreland MD, Kathryn I. Frank RN, PhD, Emilie L. Garrison BA, Qing Tang MS, Julia Loubeau MSN, AGPCNP-C, Julie Krieger MSN, AGPCNP-BC, Sarah Hartman NP, Sarah Roth MHA, MPH, PMP, CCRP, Debra K. Litzelman MA, MD, MACP
{"title":"Responding to a nursing mandate in long-term care: A multi-modal pilot curriculum for bachelor of science in nursing students","authors":"Glenda R. Westmoreland MD,&nbsp;Kathryn I. Frank RN, PhD,&nbsp;Emilie L. Garrison BA,&nbsp;Qing Tang MS,&nbsp;Julia Loubeau MSN, AGPCNP-C,&nbsp;Julie Krieger MSN, AGPCNP-BC,&nbsp;Sarah Hartman NP,&nbsp;Sarah Roth MHA, MPH, PMP, CCRP,&nbsp;Debra K. Litzelman MA, MD, MACP","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>On September 1, 2023, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released new guidelines for staffing long-term care (LTC) in the U.S. responding to the Executive order from President Biden. The order requires improvement in the quality of care for 1.2 million residents of LTC facilities, most of whom are older adults.<span><sup>1</sup></span> These guidelines mandate in-facility presence of registered nurses round-the-clock, seven-days-a-week and enhanced presence of nurse's aides who have training to meet the complex care needs of LTC residents.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Expanding the currently inadequate nursing workforce in LTC is critical. Comprehensive review of the literature found that including geriatrics and LTC content in undergraduate nursing students' curriculum through clinical placements effectively enhanced their competence in these content areas.<span><sup>2</sup></span></p><p>We developed a new geriatrics curriculum for Bachelor of Nursing Students (BSN) that included content as the 4Ms of Age Friendly Care coupled with LTC content.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Learners completed the multi-modal curriculum, which included an online component, at their own pace. In the absence of real patients through clinical placements, interacting with standardized patients (SPs) is another actionable teaching model. Research by the National Council for the State Boards of Nursing found that replacing traditional clinical hours with high-fidelity simulated experiences are effective in nursing curriculum.<span><sup>4</sup></span> After completing our multi-modal curriculum, learners applied the content using virtual SPs. Our program is the first of its kind where use of “virtual SPs” means the SPs were live, but students were interacting with them through a virtual platform. After the interaction students received feedback from the SP and a faculty member who was also observing the interaction through Zoom.</p><p>Our new curriculum used multiple modalities including locally and nationally developed web modules on geriatrics topics, myths of aging, advanced care planning, and LTC and videos on dementia and the 4Ms. Students completed the roughly 10-h curriculum at their own pace. Our objectives focused on students defining the 4Ms, applying them to a LTC population, and having exposure to LTC as a potential new career option.</p><p>Student evaluation included: (1) pre- and post-knowledge assessment (using the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale and web-based module questions); (2) attitude assessment (using the Kogan's Attitude Toward Older People Scale and the Four-Domain Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff); and (3) skills using four virtual standardized patient scenarios developed by the investigators. Investigators trained SPs on the scenarios. Training was repeated until 80% agreement on checklist completion between the SP and the investigator was achieved. Students were given 20 min to interact with the SPs per scenario, followed by 10 min of feedback provided by both the SP and the faculty observer.</p><p>The Biden Administration in late 2023 issued an Executive order taking steps to improve the quality of care in LTC facilities through increasing staffing time provided by nurses and nurse's aides. This legislation will result in the need to train more nursing professionals to provide care. According to Miller et al., the declining quality of care in LTC due to staffing shortages is partially a result of the pandemic. We piloted a new curriculum which is multi-modal in both instruction (e.g., online learning and virtual SPs) and assessment. According to Tirola et al., virtual SPs are especially valuable during personnel and resources shortages. Our pilot shows promise in providing instruction on geriatric content and LTC.</p><p>We found significant difference between the pre- and post-scores for all the web-based modules and a marginally significant improvement in positively focused items on the Attitude Toward Older People survey. There was no significant difference between individual pre- and post-Alzheimer's disease knowledge scores and the Professionalism Domain on the Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff. Although low number of students and completion rate of attitude surveys are limitations of our study, piloting innovative curriculum about LTC care for nursing students are essential given the rapidly increasing U.S. aging population. We found coupling online educational modalities with virtual SPs showed promising results for BSN education and deserves further evaluation. Students' responses indicated the web-based content was helpful both for providing instruction and feedback. Multi-modal teaching strategies and assessment methods are essential to increase the nursing workforce in an attempt to meet staffing demands in LTC facilities.</p><p><b>Glenda R. Westmoreland</b>: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. <b>Kathryn I. Frank</b>: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. <b>Emilie L. Garrison</b>: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. <b>Qing Tang</b>: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. <b>Julia Loubeau</b>: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the version to be published. <b>Julie Krieger</b>: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the version to be published. <b>Sarah Hartman</b>: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the version to be published. <b>Sarah Roth</b>: Aquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; draft the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. <b>Debra K. Litzelman</b>: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published.</p><p>No authors have a conflict of interest to report.</p><p>This publication is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award totaling $4,083,767 with zero percentage financed with non-governmental sources. The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On September 1, 2023, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released new guidelines for staffing long-term care (LTC) in the U.S. responding to the Executive order from President Biden. The order requires improvement in the quality of care for 1.2 million residents of LTC facilities, most of whom are older adults.1 These guidelines mandate in-facility presence of registered nurses round-the-clock, seven-days-a-week and enhanced presence of nurse's aides who have training to meet the complex care needs of LTC residents.1 Expanding the currently inadequate nursing workforce in LTC is critical. Comprehensive review of the literature found that including geriatrics and LTC content in undergraduate nursing students' curriculum through clinical placements effectively enhanced their competence in these content areas.2

We developed a new geriatrics curriculum for Bachelor of Nursing Students (BSN) that included content as the 4Ms of Age Friendly Care coupled with LTC content.3 Learners completed the multi-modal curriculum, which included an online component, at their own pace. In the absence of real patients through clinical placements, interacting with standardized patients (SPs) is another actionable teaching model. Research by the National Council for the State Boards of Nursing found that replacing traditional clinical hours with high-fidelity simulated experiences are effective in nursing curriculum.4 After completing our multi-modal curriculum, learners applied the content using virtual SPs. Our program is the first of its kind where use of “virtual SPs” means the SPs were live, but students were interacting with them through a virtual platform. After the interaction students received feedback from the SP and a faculty member who was also observing the interaction through Zoom.

Our new curriculum used multiple modalities including locally and nationally developed web modules on geriatrics topics, myths of aging, advanced care planning, and LTC and videos on dementia and the 4Ms. Students completed the roughly 10-h curriculum at their own pace. Our objectives focused on students defining the 4Ms, applying them to a LTC population, and having exposure to LTC as a potential new career option.

Student evaluation included: (1) pre- and post-knowledge assessment (using the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale and web-based module questions); (2) attitude assessment (using the Kogan's Attitude Toward Older People Scale and the Four-Domain Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff); and (3) skills using four virtual standardized patient scenarios developed by the investigators. Investigators trained SPs on the scenarios. Training was repeated until 80% agreement on checklist completion between the SP and the investigator was achieved. Students were given 20 min to interact with the SPs per scenario, followed by 10 min of feedback provided by both the SP and the faculty observer.

The Biden Administration in late 2023 issued an Executive order taking steps to improve the quality of care in LTC facilities through increasing staffing time provided by nurses and nurse's aides. This legislation will result in the need to train more nursing professionals to provide care. According to Miller et al., the declining quality of care in LTC due to staffing shortages is partially a result of the pandemic. We piloted a new curriculum which is multi-modal in both instruction (e.g., online learning and virtual SPs) and assessment. According to Tirola et al., virtual SPs are especially valuable during personnel and resources shortages. Our pilot shows promise in providing instruction on geriatric content and LTC.

We found significant difference between the pre- and post-scores for all the web-based modules and a marginally significant improvement in positively focused items on the Attitude Toward Older People survey. There was no significant difference between individual pre- and post-Alzheimer's disease knowledge scores and the Professionalism Domain on the Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff. Although low number of students and completion rate of attitude surveys are limitations of our study, piloting innovative curriculum about LTC care for nursing students are essential given the rapidly increasing U.S. aging population. We found coupling online educational modalities with virtual SPs showed promising results for BSN education and deserves further evaluation. Students' responses indicated the web-based content was helpful both for providing instruction and feedback. Multi-modal teaching strategies and assessment methods are essential to increase the nursing workforce in an attempt to meet staffing demands in LTC facilities.

Glenda R. Westmoreland: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. Kathryn I. Frank: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. Emilie L. Garrison: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. Qing Tang: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. Julia Loubeau: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the version to be published. Julie Krieger: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the version to be published. Sarah Hartman: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; final approval of the version to be published. Sarah Roth: Aquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; draft the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published. Debra K. Litzelman: Substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; final approval of the version to be published.

No authors have a conflict of interest to report.

This publication is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as part of an award totaling $4,083,767 with zero percentage financed with non-governmental sources. The contents are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of, nor an endorsement, by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应对长期护理中的护理任务:针对护理学学士学生的多模式试点课程。
弗兰克:在构思和设计、或获取数据、或分析和解释数据方面做出了实质性贡献;起草了文章或对重要的知识性内容进行了批判性修改;最终批准了即将发表的版本。Emilie L. Garrison:在构思和设计、或获取数据、或分析和解释数据方面做出了实质性贡献;起草了文章或对重要的知识性内容进行了批判性修改;最终批准了即将发表的版本。唐青在构思和设计、或获取数据、或分析和解释数据方面做出了实质性贡献;起草了文章或对重要的知识性内容进行了批判性修改;最终批准了即将发表的版本。朱莉娅-卢博在构思和设计、或获取数据、或分析和解释数据方面做出了实质性贡献;最终批准了即将发表的版本。朱莉-克里格在构思和设计、或获取数据、或分析和解释数据方面做出了实质性贡献;最终批准了即将发表的版本。莎拉-哈特曼(Sarah Hartman):在构思和设计、或数据采集、或数据分析和解释方面做出了实质性贡献;最终批准了即将发表的版本。萨拉-罗斯获取数据,或分析和解释数据;起草文章或对重要的知识性内容进行批判性修改;最终批准即将发表的版本。Debra K. Litzelman:在构思和设计、或获取数据、或分析和解释数据方面做出了实质性贡献;起草了文章或对重要的知识性内容进行了批判性修改;最终批准了待发表的版本。本出版物由美国卫生与公众服务部卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)资助,该奖项总额为408.3767万美元,其中由非政府来源资助的部分所占比例为零。本文内容仅代表作者个人观点,不代表人力资源管理局、HHS 或美国政府的官方观点或认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on Lonely, Single and Over 50? China has a Game Show for That. Issue Information Author Index Introduction for the 2024 Chinese Congress on Gerontology and Health Industry (CCGI) Abstracts Abstracts for JGS Chinese Supplement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1