Mechanisms of Alleviating Gypsum Scaling by Antiscalants during Membrane Desalination: Implications on Agricultural Drainage Water Reuse

Xinyu Tang, Haizhou Liu
{"title":"Mechanisms of Alleviating Gypsum Scaling by Antiscalants during Membrane Desalination: Implications on Agricultural Drainage Water Reuse","authors":"Xinyu Tang, Haizhou Liu","doi":"10.1021/acsestwater.4c00298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural drainage water has great potential as a freshwater supply via reverse osmosis (RO) membrane desalination. However, high calcium and sulfate concentrations in the drainage water lead to gypsum (CaSO<sub>4(s)</sub>) scaling during the RO process. This study investigated the effects of three antiscalants, i.e., two phosphonate-based (DTPMP and NTMP) and one polymer-based (PAA), as well as pH and natural organic matter (NOM) on alleviating gypsum scaling during RO desalination of drainage water, and illustrated the gypsum inhibition mechanism of three antiscalants. Results showed that 1 μM of DTPMP was sufficient to prevent gypsum scaling within 24 h of RO desalination, while both NTMP and PAA required 5 μM of dosage. At acidic pH 3, the permeate flux with 5 μM of DTPMP remained relatively stable, whereas the flux with NTMP and PAA decreased by 35 and 80%, respectively. Furthermore, the presence of NOM did not significantly affect the antiscalant inhibitive capacity. The gypsum inhibition mechanism of DTPMP and NTMP was primarily contributed by negative charge repulsion, with higher pH increasing the total charge of antiscalant aqueous species, thereby strengthening the repulsive forces among calcium, sulfate, and gypsum nuclei. In contrast, PAA’s gypsum inhibition mechanism involved both negative charge repulsion and crystal lattice distortion, which distorted gypsum crystals into irregular shapes and smaller sizes, preventing the formation of large-size gypsum precipitates under neutral and alkaline conditions, but deteriorating membrane scaling under acidic conditions. Ultimately, an ideal antiscalant for preventing gypsum scaling during RO desalination of agricultural drainage water would preserve higher negative charges without changing the precipitate morphology.","PeriodicalId":7078,"journal":{"name":"ACS Es&t Water","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Es&t Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural drainage water has great potential as a freshwater supply via reverse osmosis (RO) membrane desalination. However, high calcium and sulfate concentrations in the drainage water lead to gypsum (CaSO4(s)) scaling during the RO process. This study investigated the effects of three antiscalants, i.e., two phosphonate-based (DTPMP and NTMP) and one polymer-based (PAA), as well as pH and natural organic matter (NOM) on alleviating gypsum scaling during RO desalination of drainage water, and illustrated the gypsum inhibition mechanism of three antiscalants. Results showed that 1 μM of DTPMP was sufficient to prevent gypsum scaling within 24 h of RO desalination, while both NTMP and PAA required 5 μM of dosage. At acidic pH 3, the permeate flux with 5 μM of DTPMP remained relatively stable, whereas the flux with NTMP and PAA decreased by 35 and 80%, respectively. Furthermore, the presence of NOM did not significantly affect the antiscalant inhibitive capacity. The gypsum inhibition mechanism of DTPMP and NTMP was primarily contributed by negative charge repulsion, with higher pH increasing the total charge of antiscalant aqueous species, thereby strengthening the repulsive forces among calcium, sulfate, and gypsum nuclei. In contrast, PAA’s gypsum inhibition mechanism involved both negative charge repulsion and crystal lattice distortion, which distorted gypsum crystals into irregular shapes and smaller sizes, preventing the formation of large-size gypsum precipitates under neutral and alkaline conditions, but deteriorating membrane scaling under acidic conditions. Ultimately, an ideal antiscalant for preventing gypsum scaling during RO desalination of agricultural drainage water would preserve higher negative charges without changing the precipitate morphology.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膜法海水淡化过程中抗泥沙剂缓解石膏结垢的机理:对农业排水回用的影响
通过反渗透(RO)膜淡化,农业排水作为淡水供应具有巨大潜力。然而,在反渗透过程中,排水中的高浓度钙和硫酸盐会导致石膏(CaSO4(s))结垢。本研究调查了三种防垢剂(即两种膦酸盐型(DTPMP 和 NTMP)和一种聚合物型(PAA))以及 pH 值和天然有机物(NOM)对减轻反渗透海水淡化过程中石膏结垢的影响,并说明了三种防垢剂的石膏抑制机理。结果表明,在反渗透海水淡化的 24 小时内,1 μM 的 DTPMP 就足以防止石膏结垢,而 NTMP 和 PAA 都需要 5 μM 的剂量。在 pH 值为 3 的酸性条件下,使用 5 μM DTPMP 的渗透通量保持相对稳定,而使用 NTMP 和 PAA 的渗透通量则分别下降了 35% 和 80%。此外,NOM 的存在并没有明显影响抗垢剂的抑制能力。DTPMP 和 NTMP 的石膏抑制机理主要是由负电荷斥力造成的,pH 值越高,拮抗剂水体物种的总电荷越多,从而加强了钙、硫酸盐和石膏核之间的斥力。相比之下,PAA 的石膏抑制机制涉及负电荷斥力和晶格畸变,这使得石膏晶体扭曲成不规则形状,尺寸变小,在中性和碱性条件下阻止了大尺寸石膏沉淀的形成,但在酸性条件下却恶化了膜的缩放性。最终,在对农业排水进行反渗透脱盐时,防止石膏结垢的理想防垢剂应在不改变沉淀形态的情况下保持较高的负电荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Evolution Mechanism of the Water Supply System in the Water Receiving Area of a Water Diversion Project Inspired by Dissipative Structure Theory Defect Engineered 2D Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Photochemical, (Bio)Electrochemical, and Microplastic Remediation Advancements Facile Synthesis of ZIF-67-Incorporated Electrospun PVA Nanofibers Composite for Efficient Pb (II) Adsorption from Water: Docking and Experimental Studies Occurrence and Removal Efficiency of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) in Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Systematic Review from Southeast Asia Electrochemical In Situ Production of Magnetite for the Removal of Se from Wastewater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1