An Evaluation of a Community-Based Mental Health Literacy Intervention for Black Adults

IF 1.7 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK Research on Social Work Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1177/10497315241262950
Dashawna J. Fussell-Ware, Alexandria G. Bauer, Heather A. Jones, Julius A. Boatwright
{"title":"An Evaluation of a Community-Based Mental Health Literacy Intervention for Black Adults","authors":"Dashawna J. Fussell-Ware, Alexandria G. Bauer, Heather A. Jones, Julius A. Boatwright","doi":"10.1177/10497315241262950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This single-system design evaluation study assessed whether 18 Beams to Bridges (BTB) program participants would experience increased mental health literacy (MHL). It was hypothesized that MHL scores would increase significantly between the pre-intervention and intermediate assessments, but there would be no significant difference in scores between the intermediate and post-intervention assessments. Method: The MHL scale was used to assess MHL at the three timepoints. Differences in assessment scores were evaluated using paired samples t-tests. Results: Supporting the hypotheses, BTB participants had higher MHL scores on intermediate assessments compared to pre-intervention. There was also no difference between intermediate and post-intervention scores. Conclusion: MHL among Black adults increased during participation in BTB. Despite some limitations, this work is one of the first studies on MHL interventions specifically created for the Black community and should be used to further efforts to address MHL-related contributors to mental health treatment disparities impacting this community.","PeriodicalId":47993,"journal":{"name":"Research on Social Work Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Social Work Practice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241262950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This single-system design evaluation study assessed whether 18 Beams to Bridges (BTB) program participants would experience increased mental health literacy (MHL). It was hypothesized that MHL scores would increase significantly between the pre-intervention and intermediate assessments, but there would be no significant difference in scores between the intermediate and post-intervention assessments. Method: The MHL scale was used to assess MHL at the three timepoints. Differences in assessment scores were evaluated using paired samples t-tests. Results: Supporting the hypotheses, BTB participants had higher MHL scores on intermediate assessments compared to pre-intervention. There was also no difference between intermediate and post-intervention scores. Conclusion: MHL among Black adults increased during participation in BTB. Despite some limitations, this work is one of the first studies on MHL interventions specifically created for the Black community and should be used to further efforts to address MHL-related contributors to mental health treatment disparities impacting this community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对基于社区的黑人成人心理健康扫盲干预的评估
目的:这一单一系统设计的评估研究评估了 "Beams to Bridges"(BTB)项目的 18 名参与者是否会提高心理健康素养(MHL)。假设心理健康素养得分在干预前评估和中期评估之间会有显著提高,但在中期评估和干预后评估之间不会有显著差异。方法:在三个时间点使用 MHL 量表评估 MHL。评估得分的差异采用配对样本 t 检验法进行评估。结果与干预前相比,BTB 参与者在中期评估中的 MHL 得分更高,这支持了假设。中期和干预后的得分也没有差异。结论:黑人成年人的 MHL 在参与 BTB 期间有所提高。尽管存在一些局限性,但这项工作是专门针对黑人社区的 MHL 干预措施的首批研究之一,应该用来进一步努力解决影响该社区心理健康治疗差异的 MHL 相关因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: Research on Social Work Practice, sponsored by the Society for Social Work and Research, is a disciplinary journal devoted to the publication of empirical research concerning the methods and outcomes of social work practice. Social work practice is broadly interpreted to refer to the application of intentionally designed social work intervention programs to problems of societal and/or interpersonal importance, including behavior analysis or psychotherapy involving individuals; case management; practice involving couples, families, and small groups; community practice education; and the development, implementation, and evaluation of social policies.
期刊最新文献
Response to the Respondents: The NIMH Task Force Report on Social Work Research Sample Size Planning in the Design of Two-Level Randomized Cost-Effectiveness Trials Book Review: The Routledge handbook of the political economy of health and healthcare by David Primrose, Rodney Loeppky, and Robin Chang Book Review: Public health, public trust, and American fragility in a pandemic era by Goldfield, Norbert The End of Quantitative Research in Social Work? The Threat Posed by Postmodern/Critical Theory's Increasing Colonization of Academia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1