Association Between Handgrip Strength and Mortality of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1002/clc.24322
Meiling Xiao, Yu Lu, Hongqiu Li, Zhonghai Zhao
{"title":"Association Between Handgrip Strength and Mortality of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Meiling Xiao,&nbsp;Yu Lu,&nbsp;Hongqiu Li,&nbsp;Zhonghai Zhao","doi":"10.1002/clc.24322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Muscular strength has been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease in the community population. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the association between weak handgrip strength (HGS) and mortality risk in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To carry out the meta-analysis, an extensive search was conducted on databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, and CNKI to identify observational studies with longitudinal follow-up. Random-effects models were used to combine the findings, taking into account the potential influence of heterogeneity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eight observational studies involving 10 543 patients with CAD were included. During a mean follow-up duration of 20.4 months, 1327 (12.6%) patients died. Pooled results showed that weak HGS at baseline was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality during follow-up (risk ratio [RR]: 1.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.50 to 2.55, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 62%). Subgroup analysis suggested a stronger association between weak HGS and increased mortality in older patients with CAD as compared to that of overall adult patients with CAD (RR: 3.01 vs. 1.60, <i>p</i> for subgroup difference = 0.004). Subgroup analyses according to study location, design, subtype of CAD, follow-up duration, analytical model, and study quality scores showed similar results (<i>p</i> for subgroup difference all &gt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Weak HGS at baseline is associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with CAD, particularly in older patients with CAD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Muscular strength has been linked to increased risk of cardiovascular disease in the community population. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the association between weak handgrip strength (HGS) and mortality risk in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

To carry out the meta-analysis, an extensive search was conducted on databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, and CNKI to identify observational studies with longitudinal follow-up. Random-effects models were used to combine the findings, taking into account the potential influence of heterogeneity.

Results

Eight observational studies involving 10 543 patients with CAD were included. During a mean follow-up duration of 20.4 months, 1327 (12.6%) patients died. Pooled results showed that weak HGS at baseline was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality during follow-up (risk ratio [RR]: 1.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.50 to 2.55, p < 0.001; I2 = 62%). Subgroup analysis suggested a stronger association between weak HGS and increased mortality in older patients with CAD as compared to that of overall adult patients with CAD (RR: 3.01 vs. 1.60, p for subgroup difference = 0.004). Subgroup analyses according to study location, design, subtype of CAD, follow-up duration, analytical model, and study quality scores showed similar results (p for subgroup difference all > 0.05).

Conclusions

Weak HGS at baseline is associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with CAD, particularly in older patients with CAD.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手握强度与冠心病患者死亡率之间的关系:一项 Meta 分析
背景:在社区人群中,肌肉力量与心血管疾病风险的增加有关。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估弱握力(HGS)与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者死亡风险之间的关联:为了进行荟萃分析,我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Wanfang 和 CNKI 等数据库中进行了广泛搜索,以确定具有纵向随访的观察性研究。考虑到异质性的潜在影响,采用随机效应模型对研究结果进行综合分析:结果:共纳入了 8 项观察性研究,涉及 10 543 名 CAD 患者。在平均 20.4 个月的随访期间,有 1327 名(12.6%)患者死亡。汇总结果显示,基线HGS较弱与随访期间全因死亡风险增加有关(风险比[RR]:1.95,95% 置信区间:1.50 至 2.55,P 2 = 62%)。亚组分析表明,与所有成人 CAD 患者相比,老年 CAD 患者的弱 HGS 与死亡率增加之间的关系更为密切(RR:3.01 vs. 1.60,亚组差异 p = 0.004)。根据研究地点、设计、CAD 亚型、随访时间、分析模型和研究质量评分进行的亚组分析显示了相似的结果(亚组差异 p 均大于 0.05):结论:基线HGS较弱与CAD患者死亡风险增加有关,尤其是老年CAD患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1