Acceptability of self-collected vaginal swabs and point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted and genital infections among pregnant women in Papua New Guinea.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Public Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2024.2381685
Lisa M Vallely, Priscilla Poga, Michaela A Riddell, Handan Wand, Alice Mengi, Steven G Badman, John Bolnga, Delly Babona, William S Pomat, Somu Nosi, Andrew J Vallely, Angela Kelly-Hanku
{"title":"Acceptability of self-collected vaginal swabs and point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted and genital infections among pregnant women in Papua New Guinea.","authors":"Lisa M Vallely, Priscilla Poga, Michaela A Riddell, Handan Wand, Alice Mengi, Steven G Badman, John Bolnga, Delly Babona, William S Pomat, Somu Nosi, Andrew J Vallely, Angela Kelly-Hanku","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2024.2381685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The self-collection of vaginal swabs and point-of-care testing and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is reported from several low-and middle-income countries. However, the reporting on women's experiences of self-collection and same-day testing and treatment of STIs is less well described. In this paper, we present the acceptability of self-collected vaginal swabs and point-of-care testing and treatment among pregnant women enrolled in a clinical trial (Women and Newborn Trial of Antenatal Intervention and Management - WANTAIM) in Papua New Guinea. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 54 women enrolled into WANTAIM to identify the acceptability of the test and treat approach. Analysis of qualitative data used deductive and inductive thematic analysis applying Sekhon, Cartwright and Francis' acceptability theoretical framework. Most women reported that they understood that the vaginal swab was to identify infections that may affect their unborn baby; however, some were unsure about the specific infections they were being tested for. Among women who tested positive for an STI, some were unsure what they had been treated for. Overall, the self-collection of vaginal swabs for STI testing during pregnancy was highly acceptable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"2381685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2024.2381685","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The self-collection of vaginal swabs and point-of-care testing and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is reported from several low-and middle-income countries. However, the reporting on women's experiences of self-collection and same-day testing and treatment of STIs is less well described. In this paper, we present the acceptability of self-collected vaginal swabs and point-of-care testing and treatment among pregnant women enrolled in a clinical trial (Women and Newborn Trial of Antenatal Intervention and Management - WANTAIM) in Papua New Guinea. Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 54 women enrolled into WANTAIM to identify the acceptability of the test and treat approach. Analysis of qualitative data used deductive and inductive thematic analysis applying Sekhon, Cartwright and Francis' acceptability theoretical framework. Most women reported that they understood that the vaginal swab was to identify infections that may affect their unborn baby; however, some were unsure about the specific infections they were being tested for. Among women who tested positive for an STI, some were unsure what they had been treated for. Overall, the self-collection of vaginal swabs for STI testing during pregnancy was highly acceptable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴布亚新几内亚孕妇对自取阴道拭子和护理点检测性传播疾病和生殖器感染的接受程度。
一些中低收入国家报告了自我采集阴道拭子以及性传播感染(STIs)护理点检测和治疗的情况。然而,有关妇女自行采集阴道拭子并在当天进行检测和治疗性传播感染的经历的报道却较少。在本文中,我们介绍了在巴布亚新几内亚参加临床试验(妇女和新生儿产前干预和管理试验 - WANTAIM)的孕妇对自取阴道拭子和护理点检测和治疗的接受程度。我们对参加 WANTAIM 的 54 名妇女进行了半结构式访谈,以确定检测和治疗方法的可接受性。定性数据分析采用了 Sekhon、Cartwright 和 Francis 的可接受性理论框架,进行了演绎和归纳主题分析。大多数妇女表示,她们知道阴道拭子检查是为了确定可能会影响胎儿的感染;但是,有些妇女并不清楚她们接受检查的具体感染是什么。在性传播感染检测呈阳性的妇女中,有些人不确定她们接受了什么治疗。总的来说,在怀孕期间自行采集阴道拭子进行性传播感染检测是非常容易被接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
期刊最新文献
Hypothetical acceptability of minimally invasive tissue sampling and considerations for practice: A qualitative study in Vietnam Unravelling the nexus of microfinance and women’s non-communicable disease (NCD) health outcomes in Sri Lanka: An exploratory study Can health promotion facilitate development in fragile states?: An instrumental variable estimation with panel data The health workforce conundrum for burn care in Uttar Pradesh, India: a qualitative exploration Access to adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Accra, Ghana: An exploratory qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1