Healthcare providers intentions to use an electronic personal health record for undocumented migrants: A qualitative exploration study in The Netherlands.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Public Health Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1080/17441692.2024.2445840
Paulien Tensen, Simone van Dormolen, Steven J M van de Vijver, Myrthe L van de Pavert, Charles O Agyemang
{"title":"Healthcare providers intentions to use an electronic personal health record for undocumented migrants: A qualitative exploration study in The Netherlands.","authors":"Paulien Tensen, Simone van Dormolen, Steven J M van de Vijver, Myrthe L van de Pavert, Charles O Agyemang","doi":"10.1080/17441692.2024.2445840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electronic Personal Health Records (EPHRs) are potentially effective tools for improving the continuity and quality of care for migrants and refugees, and specifically for undocumented migrants (UDMs). However, little is known about the intention and preconditions of healthcare providers (HCPs) to use an EPHR for UDM in the Netherlands. Between April 2023 and June 2023, thirteen interviews, using a semi-structured topic guide, were conducted with Dutch HCPs. Open coding and axial coding were used for data coding, organised using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). HCPs reported a positive user intention towards using an EPHR for UDMs, coupled with a cautious optimism regarding UDMs' willingness to use an EPHR. Actual usage was dependent on several preconditions: establishing trust among HCPs and UDMs in the EPHR, implementing a highly secure system to protect UDM's sensitive data, giving UDMs control over their EPHR, and using approaches to minimise dual record keeping and developing a user-friendly system. An EPHR shows promise to enhance continuity of care and quality for UDMs in the Netherlands. However, an EPHR should not be a prerequisite for receiving medical care but rather a supportive element in the provision of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12735,"journal":{"name":"Global Public Health","volume":"20 1","pages":"2445840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2024.2445840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic Personal Health Records (EPHRs) are potentially effective tools for improving the continuity and quality of care for migrants and refugees, and specifically for undocumented migrants (UDMs). However, little is known about the intention and preconditions of healthcare providers (HCPs) to use an EPHR for UDM in the Netherlands. Between April 2023 and June 2023, thirteen interviews, using a semi-structured topic guide, were conducted with Dutch HCPs. Open coding and axial coding were used for data coding, organised using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). HCPs reported a positive user intention towards using an EPHR for UDMs, coupled with a cautious optimism regarding UDMs' willingness to use an EPHR. Actual usage was dependent on several preconditions: establishing trust among HCPs and UDMs in the EPHR, implementing a highly secure system to protect UDM's sensitive data, giving UDMs control over their EPHR, and using approaches to minimise dual record keeping and developing a user-friendly system. An EPHR shows promise to enhance continuity of care and quality for UDMs in the Netherlands. However, an EPHR should not be a prerequisite for receiving medical care but rather a supportive element in the provision of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健提供者意图使用电子个人健康记录无证移民:定性探索研究在荷兰。
电子个人健康记录(EPHRs)可能是提高对移徙者和难民,特别是无证移徙者护理的连续性和质量的有效工具。然而,关于医疗保健提供者(HCPs)在荷兰使用EPHR进行UDM的意图和先决条件知之甚少。在2023年4月至2023年6月期间,使用半结构化主题指南与荷兰HCPs进行了13次访谈。开放编码和轴向编码用于数据编码,使用技术接受模型(TAM)组织。hcp报告了用户对udm使用EPHR的积极意向,同时对udm使用EPHR的意愿持谨慎乐观态度。实际使用取决于几个先决条件:在医疗保健提供者和UDM之间建立信任,实施一个高度安全的系统来保护UDM的敏感数据,让UDM控制他们的EPHR,使用最小化双重记录保存的方法并开发一个用户友好的系统。EPHR有望提高荷兰udm护理的连续性和质量。然而,健康状况评估不应是获得医疗服务的先决条件,而应是提供医疗服务的一个辅助因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Public Health
Global Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Global Public Health is an essential peer-reviewed journal that energetically engages with key public health issues that have come to the fore in the global environment — mounting inequalities between rich and poor; the globalization of trade; new patterns of travel and migration; epidemics of newly-emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases; the HIV/AIDS pandemic; the increase in chronic illnesses; escalating pressure on public health infrastructures around the world; and the growing range and scale of conflict situations, terrorist threats, environmental pressures, natural and human-made disasters.
期刊最新文献
Caring for children with SAM: Intersectional stories of shame, blame and stigmatisation in Zimbabwe, Zambia and Kenya. Indigenous sovereignty in research and epistemic justice: Truth telling through research. Reconciling data actionability and accountability in global health research: The case of SARS-CoV-2. 'They did not care for me. I was alone on bed like a dead person': A qualitative study on mistreatment, dignity and power during childbirth in Nepal. Healthcare providers intentions to use an electronic personal health record for undocumented migrants: A qualitative exploration study in The Netherlands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1