Hui Xu, Baorong Yue, Jinsheng Cheng, Jun Deng, Yinping Su, Qiaoqiao Zhao, Ke Xue, Zechen Feng, Yantao Niu, Quanfu Sun
{"title":"A Survey of Mean Glandular Doses and Suggestions on National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Digital Mammography in China.","authors":"Hui Xu, Baorong Yue, Jinsheng Cheng, Jun Deng, Yinping Su, Qiaoqiao Zhao, Ke Xue, Zechen Feng, Yantao Niu, Quanfu Sun","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The primary purpose of this study was to report the mean glandular doses and to determine the national diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography based on data between 2016 and 2018 in China. The data from 19,076 mammograms (4,769 examinations) by random sampling from 118 digital mammography systems were compiled. Exposure factors included age, compressed breast thickness, kVp, mAs, target/filter combination, entrance surface air kerma, and mean glandular doses, which were retrospectively surveyed and recorded from the monitor. The national diagnostic reference levels (75th percentiles) in mean glandular dose were calculated across median value obtained for all included data and stratified to specific compressed breast thickness ranges. The patients' ages ranged from 22 to 88 y, with a median age of 45. The applied voltage and output medians were 28 kVp and 75.1 mAs for all exposure, respectively. The median CBTs were 45 mm and 48 mm for craniocaudal views and mediolateral oblique views, and the corresponding median mean glandular doses were 1.32 mGy and 1.40 mGy, respectively. The national diagnostic reference level at compressed breast thickness of 40-50 mm was 1.67 mGy for CC views and 1.71 mGy for MLO views. The median mean glandular doses varied significantly and increased with compressed breast thickness, demonstrating the necessity of establishing DRL according to breast thickness and optimizing the clinic's digital mammography practice in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: The primary purpose of this study was to report the mean glandular doses and to determine the national diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography based on data between 2016 and 2018 in China. The data from 19,076 mammograms (4,769 examinations) by random sampling from 118 digital mammography systems were compiled. Exposure factors included age, compressed breast thickness, kVp, mAs, target/filter combination, entrance surface air kerma, and mean glandular doses, which were retrospectively surveyed and recorded from the monitor. The national diagnostic reference levels (75th percentiles) in mean glandular dose were calculated across median value obtained for all included data and stratified to specific compressed breast thickness ranges. The patients' ages ranged from 22 to 88 y, with a median age of 45. The applied voltage and output medians were 28 kVp and 75.1 mAs for all exposure, respectively. The median CBTs were 45 mm and 48 mm for craniocaudal views and mediolateral oblique views, and the corresponding median mean glandular doses were 1.32 mGy and 1.40 mGy, respectively. The national diagnostic reference level at compressed breast thickness of 40-50 mm was 1.67 mGy for CC views and 1.71 mGy for MLO views. The median mean glandular doses varied significantly and increased with compressed breast thickness, demonstrating the necessity of establishing DRL according to breast thickness and optimizing the clinic's digital mammography practice in China.
期刊介绍:
Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.