Subspecialty physicians' perspectives on barriers and facilitators of hepatitis C treatment: a qualitative study.

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Harm Reduction Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1186/s12954-024-01057-z
Erin Bredenberg, Catherine Callister, Ashley Dafoe, Brooke Dorsey Holliman, Sarah E Rowan, Susan L Calcaterra
{"title":"Subspecialty physicians' perspectives on barriers and facilitators of hepatitis C treatment: a qualitative study.","authors":"Erin Bredenberg, Catherine Callister, Ashley Dafoe, Brooke Dorsey Holliman, Sarah E Rowan, Susan L Calcaterra","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01057-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes chronic and curable disease with a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality across the globe. In the United States (US) and other developed countries, incidence of HCV is increasing and people who inject drugs are disproportionately affected. However, HCV treatment rates amongst patients with substance use disorders (SUD) are suboptimal. In this study, we aimed to understand the perspectives of subspecialist physicians who care for substantial numbers of patients with HCV, including addiction medicine, infectious diseases, and hepatology physicians, to better understand barriers and facilitators of HCV treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited subspecialty physicians via purposive and snowball sampling and conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 physicians at 12 institutions across the US. We used a mixed deductive and inductive approach to perform qualitative content analysis with a rapid matrix technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three major themes emerged: (1) Perceptions of patient complexity; (2) Systemic barriers to care, and (3) Importance of multidisciplinary teams. Within these themes, we elicited subthemes on the effects of patient-level factors, provider-level factors, and insurance-based requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that additional strategies are needed to reach the \"last mile\" untreated patients for HCV care, including decentralization and leverage of telehealth-based interventions to integrate treatment within primary care clinics, SUD treatment facilities, and community harm reduction sites. Such programs are likely to be more successful when multidisciplinary teams including pharmacists and/or peer navigators are involved. However, burdensome regulatory requirements continue to hinder this expansion in care and should be eliminated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01057-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes chronic and curable disease with a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality across the globe. In the United States (US) and other developed countries, incidence of HCV is increasing and people who inject drugs are disproportionately affected. However, HCV treatment rates amongst patients with substance use disorders (SUD) are suboptimal. In this study, we aimed to understand the perspectives of subspecialist physicians who care for substantial numbers of patients with HCV, including addiction medicine, infectious diseases, and hepatology physicians, to better understand barriers and facilitators of HCV treatment.

Methods: We recruited subspecialty physicians via purposive and snowball sampling and conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 physicians at 12 institutions across the US. We used a mixed deductive and inductive approach to perform qualitative content analysis with a rapid matrix technique.

Results: Three major themes emerged: (1) Perceptions of patient complexity; (2) Systemic barriers to care, and (3) Importance of multidisciplinary teams. Within these themes, we elicited subthemes on the effects of patient-level factors, provider-level factors, and insurance-based requirements.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that additional strategies are needed to reach the "last mile" untreated patients for HCV care, including decentralization and leverage of telehealth-based interventions to integrate treatment within primary care clinics, SUD treatment facilities, and community harm reduction sites. Such programs are likely to be more successful when multidisciplinary teams including pharmacists and/or peer navigators are involved. However, burdensome regulatory requirements continue to hinder this expansion in care and should be eliminated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专科医生对丙型肝炎治疗障碍和促进因素的看法:一项定性研究。
导言:丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)是一种可治愈的慢性疾病,给全球各地的发病率和死亡率带来沉重负担。在美国和其他发达国家,丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的发病率不断上升,注射吸毒者受到的影响尤为严重。然而,药物使用障碍(SUD)患者的 HCV 治疗率并不理想。在这项研究中,我们旨在了解为大量 HCV 患者提供治疗的亚专科医生(包括成瘾医学、传染病学和肝病学医生)的观点,以更好地了解 HCV 治疗的障碍和促进因素:我们通过目的性抽样和滚雪球抽样招募了亚专科医生,并对全美 12 家机构的 20 名医生进行了半结构化访谈。我们采用混合演绎法和归纳法,利用快速矩阵技术进行定性内容分析:结果:我们发现了三大主题:(1) 对患者复杂性的看法;(2) 系统性护理障碍;(3) 多学科团队的重要性。在这些主题中,我们引出了患者层面因素、医疗服务提供者层面因素和保险要求影响的次主题:我们的研究结果表明,需要采取更多策略来为 "最后一英里 "未接受治疗的患者提供丙型肝炎病毒治疗,包括分散和利用基于远程医疗的干预措施,将治疗整合到初级保健诊所、药物滥用治疗机构和社区减低危害场所中。当包括药剂师和/或同伴导航员在内的多学科团队参与其中时,此类计划可能会更加成功。然而,繁琐的监管要求继续阻碍着医疗服务的扩展,应予以取消。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
期刊最新文献
Opportunities to enhance retention on medication for opioid use disorder for adolescents and young adults: results from a qualitative study with medical providers in Philadelphia, PA. Joint smoking-vaping prevalence rates among American youth and young adults 2011-2022. Challenges and support needs among persons with a migration background who use drugs in four European metropolitan cities. Exploring and describing alcohol harm reduction interventions: a scoping review of literature from the past decade in the western world. Community alcohol sales and opioid poisoning deaths: Alcohol serving space as a harm reduction opportunity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1