Journal of Vascular Surgery最新文献

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the patency of bridging covered stents (BCS) bridged to inner branches in custom-made thoracoabdominal endografts.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study identifying all patients undergoing fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (f/b EVAR) in whom the reno-visceral target vessels (TVs) were bridged with a BCS to an inner branch of a custom-made (CMD) endograft. Technical success and perioperative complications were noted. Follow-up BCS patencies were evaluated, and in patients with follow-up, two groups based on BCS were created, a group with BCS occlusion and a group with BCS patent. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to analyze factors related to visceral and renal bridging stent occlusion.

Results: From 2019 through 2022, 69 patients undergoing complex aortic repair had at least one TV bridged to an inner branch built into a CMD endograft. Eighty-six percent of the grafts had only inner branches, whereas 14% had a mix of fenestrations for the visceral TVs and inner branches for the renal arteries. Twenty-five percent of patients presented as urgent and received an endograft originally designed for another patient and available on our shelf at the time. A total of 245 TVs were connected to inner branches: celiac trunk (CT), 54; superior mesenteric artery (SMA), 59; and renal artery (RA), 132. Technical success was 99%. There was a 23% complication and 9% perioperative mortality rate. At follow-up, we identified 6% of visceral and 14% of renal BCS occlusions. The primary patency for RA BCS was 83% at 12 months and 58% at 24 months. For the CT-SMA BCS, Kaplan-Maier showed a patency of 99% and 96% at 12 and 24 months. In the univariate analysis, a misaligned TV ostium (P = .001), the postoperative BCS diameter on postoperative computed tomography angiography (P = .02), and the preoperative infrarenal aortic angle >60° (P = .007) were correlated with RA BCS occlusion. In the multivariate analysis, only the misaligned TV ostium (P = .002) and infrarenal angle >60° (P = .01) were significantly correlated.

Conclusions: In our series of complex aortic repair, the incorporation of inner branches to bridge TVs is associated with a high renal BCS occlusion rate. Improper alignment of the branches with the TV ostium and acute aortic angles might play a significant role. Further research on this technology is needed.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare perioperative and 5-year outcomes following endovascular (FEVAR) and open repair (OAR) of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAAs) in males and females separately, given the known sex-related differences in perioperative outcomes.

Methods: We studied all elective cAAA repairs between 2014 and 2019 in the Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network (VISION) registry. We stratified patients based on sex. We calculated propensity scores for assignment to either OAR or FEVAR. Covariates including age, race, diameter, baseline comorbidities, proximal extent of repair, annual center volumes, and annual surgeon volumes were introduced into the model for estimating propensity scores. Within matched cohorts, perioperative outcomes and 5-year outcomes (mortality, reinterventions, and ruptures) were evaluated using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models.

Results: We identified 2825 patients, of whom 29% were female. Within both the sexes, OAR was more commonly performed (OAR vs FEVAR: males: 53% vs 47%; females: 63% vs 37%). After matching, among males (n = 1326), FEVAR was associated with lower perioperative mortality (FEVAR vs OAR: 2.3% vs 5.1%; P < .001). However, FEVAR was associated with comparable 5-year mortality (38% vs 28%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-1.4; P = .22) and a higher hazard of 5-year reintervention (19% vs 3.7%; adjusted HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.6-7.6; P < .001). Among females (n = 456), FEVAR and OAR showed similar perioperative mortality (8.3% vs 7.0%; P = .73). At 5 years, FEVAR was associated with higher hazards of mortality (43% vs 32%; adjusted HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.03-2.2; P = .034) and reintervention (20% vs 3.0%; adjusted HR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.1-11; P < .001) compared with OAR.

Conclusions: Among males, FEVAR was associated with favorable perioperative outcomes compared with OAR, although these advantages attenuate over time. However, among females, FEVAR was associated with similar perioperative outcomes, eventually leading to higher reinterventions and possibly higher mortality within 5 years. Future efforts should focus on determining the factors associated with these sex disparities to improve outcomes following FEVAR in females. Based on current evidence, females undergoing elective cAAA repair should be selected with due caution, especially for endovascular repair.

Objective: The best management of symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion (CICAO) has been controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis were to compare the outcomes of different treatment strategies for symptomatic CICAO.

Methods: Two independent researchers conducted a search of articles on the treatment of CICAO published between January 2000 and October 2023 in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. Twenty-two articles were eligible for meta-analysis using a random effects model to combine and analyze the data for the pooled rates of stroke and death, and the rates of procedural success and significant restenosis/occlusion.

Results: A total of 1193 patients from 22 publications were included in this study. Six of them had bilateral internal carotid artery occlusion. The 30-day stroke and death rates were 1.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-4.4%) in the best medical treatment (BMT) group, 4.1% (95% CI, 0.7%-9.3%; I² = 71.4%) in the extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass group, 4.4% (95% CI, 2.4%-6.8%; I² = 0%) in the carotid artery stenting (CAS) group, and 1.2% (95% CI, 0%-3.4%; I² = 0%) in the combined carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and stenting (CEA + CAS) group. During follow-up of 16.5 (±16.3) months, the stroke and death rates were 19.5%, 1.2%, 6.6%, and 2.4% in the BMT, EC-IC, CAS, and CEA + CAS groups respectively. The surgical success rate was 99.7% (95% CI, 98.5%-100%; I² = 0%) in the EC-IC group, 70.1% (95% CI, 62.3%-77.5%; I² = 64%) in the CAS group, and 86.4% (95% CI, 78.8%-92.7%; I² = 60%) in the CEA + CAS group. The rate of post-procedural significant restenosis or occlusion was 3.6% in the EC-IC group, 18.7% in the CAS group, and 5.7% in the CEA + CSA group. The surgical success rate was negatively associated by the length of internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. Surgical success rate was significantly higher in the patients with occlusive lesion within C1 to C4 segments, compared with those with occlusion distal to C4 segment (odds ratio, 11.3; 95% CI, 5.0-25.53; P < .001). A proximal stump of ICA is a favorable sign for CAS. The success rate of CAS was significantly higher in the patients with an ICA stump than that in the patients without (odds ratio, 11.36; 95% CI, 4.84-26.64; P < .01). However, the success rate of CEA + CAS was not affected by the proximal ICA stump.

Conclusions: For the management of symptomatic CICAO, BMT alone is associated with the highest risk of mid- and long-term stroke and death. EC-IC bypass surgery and CEA + CAS should be considered as the choice of treatment based on operator's expertise and patient's anatomy. CAS may be employed as an alternative option in high surgical risk patients, especially when proximal ICA stump exists.

Objective: Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated a notable prevalence of immediate technical failures in percutaneous vascular interventions (PVIs) for complex arterial lesions associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Current imaging modalities present inherent limitations in identifying these lesions, making it challenging to determine the most suitable candidates for PVI. We present a novel preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) histology protocol for identifying lesions that might present a higher rate of immediate and midterm PVI failure.

Methods: We enrolled 22 patients (13 females, average age 65.8 ± 9.72 years) scheduled for PVI were prospectively and underwent 3T MRI using ultrashort echo time and steady-state free precession contrasts to characterize target lesions before PVI. Lesions were scored as hard if >50% of the lumen was occluded by hard components (calcium/dense collagen) on MRI in the hardest cross-section. Two readers evaluated MRI datasets. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC)/Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS)/Wound, Ischemia and Foot infection scoring was performed based on intraprocedural angiograms and chart review. The relationship between MRI scoring, TASC/GLASS scoring, and procedural outcomes was investigated using univariate analysis. Midterm follow-up (revascularization and amputation rates) was recorded at 3 and 6 months after the intervention.

Results: Our cohort of 22 patients yielded 40 target lesions. Five lesions were excluded (two for nondiagnostic image quality; three PVIs were ultimately diagnostic only). Six lesions (17%) were scored as hard. MRI-scored hard lesions had a higher proportion of immediate technical failure (hard vs soft 83% [5/6] vs 3% [1/29]; P < .001). Hard vs soft MRI scoring was the only factor significantly associated with immediate PVI technical success (P < .001), as opposed to TASC/GLASS scoring. Both at 3 months and 6 months after PVI, the reintervention rate was significantly higher among those lesions which were scored hard on MRI (3 months hard, 80% vs soft, 16% [P =.011]; 6 months hard, 80% vs soft, 27%; P = .047).

Conclusions: MRI histology could be a valuable tool for optimizing PVI patient selection and treatment strategies.

Background: Endovascular treatment of the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation is currently recommended for patients with hostile groin (prior femoral bifurcation open surgery, history of radiotherapy) or severe comorbidities (advanced age, frailty, obesity). Preliminary results have shown favorable outcomes. Among the different endovascular techniques (atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy, plain balloon angioplasty, drug-coated balloon angioplasty, stenting), stents are mainly used but the best type of stent to use is still debated. The aim of this study was to assess the value of balloon-expandable stents (BES) and self-expandable stents (SES) for stenosis of the femoral bifurcation.

Methods: Consecutive patients with stenosis of the CFA and its bifurcation were included from 2016 to 2022. Demographic data, the type of stent used, procedural data, and angiographic variables were collected. Groups were defined according to the type of stent implanted. Primary patency was defined as a binary end point based on a duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio of ≤2.4 as assessed by duplex ultrasound examination, in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Secondary outcomes were clinical sustained improvement, freedom from TLR at 12 months, mean ankle-brachial index improvement, primary-assisted patency, and secondary patency.

Results: A total of 90 procedures conducted in 77 patients were included in this study, 26 in the SES group and 64 in the BES group. The most common symptomatology according to the Rutherford classification was class 2, 3, and 4 (28%, 48%, and 8%, respectively). The type of lesions in the CFA, assessed using the Azema classification, were comparable between both groups (SES/BES group type 2: 31%/27%; type 3: 54%/62%). At 12 months, the primary patency rates for SES and BES were 88% (26/26 patients) and 72% (58/64 patients) (P = .10). At 12 months, freedom from TLR rates for SES and BES were 97% vs 81%, respectively (P = .13).

Conclusions: SES for CFA stenosis show a trend toward better patency and freedom from TLR rates at 12 months. However, controlled studies are warranted to further investigate the significance of this trend.

Objective: Proximal ExTension to Induce COmplete ATtachment (PETTICOAT), which uses downstream bare metal stents for structural support, demonstrates potential, yet its adoption is limited by variable outcomes. This study elucidates the potential of PETTICOAT in aortic dissection, emphasizing the determinants that guide patient selection.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients who underwent full PETTICOAT for aortic dissections was conducted. A multivariate logistic regression model identified predictors of favorable aortic remodeling. Patients underwent standardized follow-up with computed tomography scans to assess size, volumetric changes, and anatomical conditions. Selection criteria included full PETTICOAT application and a minimum of 3 months of follow-up. Demographics, preoperative conditions, and procedural details were collected and analyzed.

Results: The analysis identified predictors of favorable aortic remodeling, including age >60 years, a larger downstream aorta stent graft, a smaller abdominal aorta (<450 mm²), and oral angiotensin II receptor blocker administration. Over a median 47.5 months of follow-up, survival rates in the favorable remodeling (97.3%) and unfavorable groups (100%) were similar. Downstream aortic event-free survival rates did not differ significantly (89.2% vs 73.9%), although the unfavorable group had a relatively higher incidence of distal stent-induced new entries (26.1% vs 8.1%).

Conclusions: The PETTICOAT concept effectively enhances aortic remodeling in complex aortic dissections. Predictors for favorable remodeling, including age, stent graft sizing, aortic diameter, and angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy, offer insights for optimizing patient selection. This approach improves survival outcomes, mitigates risks associated with untreated aortic segments, and provides a minimally invasive solution for aortic dissections. Despite some outcome variations, the technique holds promise for addressing the challenges of aortic dissections, with the potential for further refinement in patient selection and technique application.

Objectives: Fenestrated-branched endovascular technology (F/B-EVAR) is increasingly used to repair complex aortic aneurysms. While reintervention, morbidity and mortality after F/B-EVAR have been well-characterized, studies on patient-reported quality of life (QOL) after F/B-EVAR have been limited in their use of non-specific instruments and measures. We report on disease-specific QOL in patients that underwent F/B-EVAR using a validated QOL survey for aortic aneurysms.

Methods: Prospectively maintained databases were used to contact living patients that underwent F/B-EVAR for pararenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms at two institutions. Eligible patients (n = 286) were asked to complete a disease-specific QOL survey previously validated in patients that underwent repair of an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. An emotional impact score (EIS) from 0-100 was derived from the survey with higher scores indicating more emotional impact and worse QOL. Respondent behavior change following F/B-EVAR was evaluated in four domains (strenuous activity, travel, heavy lifting, and sexual activity) previously identified by patients to be most impacted by an aortic aneurysm.

Results: In total, 234 patients (82%) completed surveys. Mean post-operative interval to survey completion was 3.4 ± 2.8 years. Mean EIS was 16 (range 0-91) for all patients surveyed, with higher mean EIS among those within the first year after F/B-EVAR (20 vs 14). Most respondents demonstrated limited adverse emotional impact after F/B-EVAR. However, the 4^th quartile of EIS was broad (22-91), indicating that a subset of respondents had significantly worse QOL after repair. While most patients reported no post-procedure change in each of the activity domains, over 40% of patients did report decrease in strenuous activity and heavy lifting after F/B-EVAR. Those with decreased activity after repair had corresponding deficiencies in disease-specific knowledge for the domains of heavy lifting (P <.001) and sexual activity (P = .17).

Conclusions: The majority of patients who underwent F/B-EVAR in this cohort had low emotional impact on their QOL after repair. One-quarter of patients did report significant post-procedure anxiety about their aneurysm, with improvement observed beyond one year after repair. Most patients reported unchanged or decreased activity levels following F/B-EVAR, and less aneurysm-specific patient knowledge was associated with decreased activity after repair. These findings are similar to those seen in prior work using this survey instrument in patients that underwent infrarenal aneurysm repair. This work confirms the feasibility of using this survey to evaluate QOL in patients with complex aortic disease. Longitudinal evaluation in these patients may identify those at high-risk for worse QOL after F/B-EVAR.