Limited Sampling Strategies Fail to Accurately Predict Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Curve in Kidney Transplant Recipients and the Impact of Enterohepatic Recirculation.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1097/FTD.0000000000001248
Moataz E Mohamed, Abdelrahman Saqr, Mahmoud Al-Kofahi, Guillaume Onyeaghala, Rory P Remmel, Christopher Staley, Casey R Dorr, Levi Teigen, Weihua Guan, Henry Madden, Julia Munoz, Duy Vo, Bryan Sanchez, Rasha El-Rifai, William S Oetting, Arthur J Matas, Ajay K Israni, Pamala A Jacobson
{"title":"Limited Sampling Strategies Fail to Accurately Predict Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Curve in Kidney Transplant Recipients and the Impact of Enterohepatic Recirculation.","authors":"Moataz E Mohamed, Abdelrahman Saqr, Mahmoud Al-Kofahi, Guillaume Onyeaghala, Rory P Remmel, Christopher Staley, Casey R Dorr, Levi Teigen, Weihua Guan, Henry Madden, Julia Munoz, Duy Vo, Bryan Sanchez, Rasha El-Rifai, William S Oetting, Arthur J Matas, Ajay K Israni, Pamala A Jacobson","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring for mycophenolic acid (MPA) is challenging due to difficulties in measuring the area under the curve (AUC). Limited sampling strategies (LSSs) have been developed for MPA therapeutic drug monitoring but come with risk of unacceptable performance. The authors hypothesized that the poor predictive performance of LSSs were due to the variability in MPA enterohepatic recirculation (EHR). This study is the first to evaluate LSSs models performance in the context of EHR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult kidney transplant recipients (n = 84) receiving oral mycophenolate mofetil underwent intensive MPA pharmacokinetic sampling. MPA AUC0-12hr and EHR were determined. Published MPA LSSs in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus were evaluated for their predictive performance in estimating AUC0-12hr in our full cohort and separately in individuals with high and low EHR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the evaluated LSS models (n = 12) showed good precision or accuracy in predicting MPA AUC0-12hr in the full cohort. In the high EHR group, models with late timepoints had better accuracy but low precision, except for 1 model with late timepoints at 6 and 10 hours postdose, which had marginally acceptable precision. For all models, the good guess of predicted AUC0-12hr (±15% of observed AUC0-12hr) was highly variable (range, full cohort = 19%-61.9%; high EHR = 4.5%-65.9%; low EHR = 27.5%-62.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predictive performance of the LSS models varied according to EHR status. Timepoints ≥5 hours postdose in LSS models are essential to capture EHR. Models and strategies that incorporate EHR during development are required to accurately ascertain MPA exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring for mycophenolic acid (MPA) is challenging due to difficulties in measuring the area under the curve (AUC). Limited sampling strategies (LSSs) have been developed for MPA therapeutic drug monitoring but come with risk of unacceptable performance. The authors hypothesized that the poor predictive performance of LSSs were due to the variability in MPA enterohepatic recirculation (EHR). This study is the first to evaluate LSSs models performance in the context of EHR.

Methods: Adult kidney transplant recipients (n = 84) receiving oral mycophenolate mofetil underwent intensive MPA pharmacokinetic sampling. MPA AUC0-12hr and EHR were determined. Published MPA LSSs in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus were evaluated for their predictive performance in estimating AUC0-12hr in our full cohort and separately in individuals with high and low EHR.

Results: None of the evaluated LSS models (n = 12) showed good precision or accuracy in predicting MPA AUC0-12hr in the full cohort. In the high EHR group, models with late timepoints had better accuracy but low precision, except for 1 model with late timepoints at 6 and 10 hours postdose, which had marginally acceptable precision. For all models, the good guess of predicted AUC0-12hr (±15% of observed AUC0-12hr) was highly variable (range, full cohort = 19%-61.9%; high EHR = 4.5%-65.9%; low EHR = 27.5%-62.5%).

Conclusions: The predictive performance of the LSS models varied according to EHR status. Timepoints ≥5 hours postdose in LSS models are essential to capture EHR. Models and strategies that incorporate EHR during development are required to accurately ascertain MPA exposure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有限采样策略无法准确预测肾移植受者的霉酚酸曲线下面积以及肝内再循环的影响
背景:由于难以测量曲线下面积(AUC),霉酚酸(MPA)的治疗药物监测具有挑战性。目前已开发出用于 MPA 治疗药物监测的有限采样策略 (LSS),但有可能出现无法接受的结果。作者假设 LSS 的预测性能不佳是由于 MPA 肠肝再循环 (EHR) 的变异性造成的。本研究首次评估了 EHR 背景下的 LSSs 模型性能:方法:接受口服霉酚酸酯治疗的成年肾移植受者(n = 84)接受了密集的 MPA 药代动力学采样。测定了 MPA AUC0-12hr 和 EHR。对已发表的肾移植受者接受他克莫司治疗时的MPA LSS进行了评估,以确定其在估计整个队列的AUC0-12hr时的预测性能,并分别评估了高EHR和低EHR个体的预测性能:结果:所评估的 LSS 模型(n = 12)在预测整个队列中的 MPA AUC0-12hr 时均未显示出良好的精确性或准确性。在高 EHR 组中,时间点较晚的模型准确度较高,但精确度较低,只有一个模型的时间点较晚,分别在服药后 6 小时和 10 小时,其精确度尚可接受。对于所有模型,预测 AUC0-12hr 的良好猜测值(观察到的 AUC0-12hr 的 ±15%)变化很大(范围,全队列 = 19%-61.9%;高 EHR = 4.5%-65.9%;低 EHR = 27.5%-62.5%):结论:LSS 模型的预测性能因 EHR 状态而异。LSS模型中用药后≥5小时的时间点对于捕捉EHR至关重要。要准确确定 MPA 暴露,需要在开发过程中纳入 EHR 的模型和策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Serum Concentration of Antidepressant Drugs in Geriatric Day Care Patients With Renal Insufficiency and Multimorbidity. Alternate Sampling Matrices for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Immunosuppressants. Midazolam Boosting With Cobicistat in a Patient With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy and Focal Status Epilepticus. New Developments and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Options in Costimulatory Blockade in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Critical Review. Implementation of Volumetric Finger-Prick Self-Sampling for TDM of Immunosuppressants After Kidney Transplantation: Lessons Learned from the Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1