Evaluation of the Veterinary IDEXX SNAP 4Dx Plus Test for the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Humans.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Vector borne and zoonotic diseases Pub Date : 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1089/vbz.2024.0047
Gayoung Lee, Peyton Pretsch, Lauryn Ursery, Dana Giandomenico, Haley A Abernathy, Lanya Evans, Barbara A Qurollo, Edward B Breitschwerdt, Ross M Boyce
{"title":"Evaluation of the Veterinary IDEXX SNAP 4Dx Plus Test for the Diagnosis of Lyme Disease in Humans.","authors":"Gayoung Lee, Peyton Pretsch, Lauryn Ursery, Dana Giandomenico, Haley A Abernathy, Lanya Evans, Barbara A Qurollo, Edward B Breitschwerdt, Ross M Boyce","doi":"10.1089/vbz.2024.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i><b>Background:</b></i> Lyme disease, caused by infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States. The standard two-tier testing (STTT) algorithm suffers from low sensitivity, misinterpretation, and long turnaround time, preventing timely detection and treatment. To address these challenges, we hypothesized that the canine point-of-care (PoC) SNAP 4Dx Plus test used to detect Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies could be employed for human diagnosis. <i><b>Materials and Methods:</b></i> The SNAP 4Dx Plus testing was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, with results read by manual inspection. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.1, and agreement between the PoC assay and the STTT was assessed using kappa statistics with GraphPad software. <i><b>Results:</b></i> We included 102 previously-tested human serum samples, of which 19 samples (18.6%) were STTT positive. Compared to the STTT, the SNAP 4Dx Plus test demonstrated a low sensitivity of 0.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.40). <i><b>Conclusion:</b></i> Overall, our results do not support the use of the SNAP 4Dx Plus LD assay for the diagnosis of human Lyme disease. Differences in antibody concentrations between human and canine samples may partly explain our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23683,"journal":{"name":"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2024.0047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lyme disease, caused by infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States. The standard two-tier testing (STTT) algorithm suffers from low sensitivity, misinterpretation, and long turnaround time, preventing timely detection and treatment. To address these challenges, we hypothesized that the canine point-of-care (PoC) SNAP 4Dx Plus test used to detect Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies could be employed for human diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The SNAP 4Dx Plus testing was conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, with results read by manual inspection. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.3.1, and agreement between the PoC assay and the STTT was assessed using kappa statistics with GraphPad software. Results: We included 102 previously-tested human serum samples, of which 19 samples (18.6%) were STTT positive. Compared to the STTT, the SNAP 4Dx Plus test demonstrated a low sensitivity of 0.16 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.40). Conclusion: Overall, our results do not support the use of the SNAP 4Dx Plus LD assay for the diagnosis of human Lyme disease. Differences in antibody concentrations between human and canine samples may partly explain our findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估用于诊断人类莱姆病的兽用 IDEXX SNAP 4Dx Plus 检测试剂盒。
背景:莱姆病是由鲍氏不动杆菌感染引起的,是美国最常见的病媒传染病。标准的双层检测(STTT)算法存在灵敏度低、误判和周转时间长等问题,无法及时检测和治疗。为了应对这些挑战,我们假设可将用于检测鲍瑞氏菌抗体的犬科护理点(PoC)SNAP 4Dx Plus 检测用于人类诊断。材料与方法:SNAP 4Dx Plus 检测按照制造商的说明进行,结果通过人工检查读取。所有分析均使用 R 4.3.1 版进行,并使用 GraphPad 软件的卡帕统计法评估 PoC 检测与 STTT 之间的一致性。结果我们纳入了 102 份先前检测过的人类血清样本,其中 19 份样本(18.6%)呈 STTT 阳性。与 STTT 相比,SNAP 4Dx Plus 检验的灵敏度较低,仅为 0.16(95% CI 0.03 至 0.40)。结论总的来说,我们的结果不支持使用 SNAP 4Dx Plus LD 检测法诊断人类莱姆病。人类样本和犬类样本抗体浓度的差异可能是我们研究结果的部分原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases is an authoritative, peer-reviewed journal providing basic and applied research on diseases transmitted to humans by invertebrate vectors or non-human vertebrates. The Journal examines geographic, seasonal, and other risk factors that influence the transmission, diagnosis, management, and prevention of this group of infectious diseases, and identifies global trends that have the potential to result in major epidemics. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases coverage includes: -Ecology -Entomology -Epidemiology -Infectious diseases -Microbiology -Parasitology -Pathology -Public health -Tropical medicine -Wildlife biology -Bacterial, rickettsial, viral, and parasitic zoonoses
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Features of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever in Children and Adults: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study and Literature Review. Prevalence of Anaplasma Spp. and Theileria Spp. Antigens and Antibodies in Housed and Grazing Korean Indigenous Cattle. The First Report of Sphaerirostris picae Infection in the Oriental Magpie (Pica serica) in Beijing, China. Isolation of Rickettsia heilongjiangensis (Strain AH-19) from Haemaphysalis longicornis on a Wild Hedgehog in Anhui Province, China. Detection of DENV-1, DENV-3, and DENV-4 Serotypes in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, and Epidemic Risk in the Departments of Oueme and Plateau, South-Eastern Benin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1