Network Analysis of the Association between Minority Stress and Activism in LGB People from Poland.

Aleksandra Krok, Zofia Kardasz, Aleksandra M Rogowska
{"title":"Network Analysis of the Association between Minority Stress and Activism in LGB People from Poland.","authors":"Aleksandra Krok, Zofia Kardasz, Aleksandra M Rogowska","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe14070122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>(1) Background: This paper presents an analysis of the associations between minority stressors and activism in the population of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in Poland. (2) Methods: The cross-sectional online-based research was conducted among 192 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people in two groups: activists (<i>n</i> = 51) and people not engaged in activism (<i>n</i> = 141). Four scales of the Sexual Minority Stress Scale were used: Internalized Homophobia, Expectation of Rejection, Concealment, and Sexual Minority Negative Events Scale. Activism was measured using the Activism Scale and a single item asking about belonging to an activist group. (3) Results: Activists, lesbians, and gays scored significantly higher in the Sexual Minority Negative Events than people not involved in activism and bisexual individuals. Attitude toward LGBT+ activism correlated weakly and positively with Sexual Minority Negative Events and Expectation of Rejection while negatively with Internalized Homophobia. The Network Analysis showed that positive attitudes toward LGBT+ activism, the expectation of rejection, and negative events in minority stress are the most influential variables in the network model, playing a crucial role in the interaction between particular dimensions of minority stress. (4) Conclusions: Prevention and intervention programs should focus on reducing minority stress, especially negative events and rejection, especially among lesbians, gays, and people engaged in LGBT+ activism. The cooperation of politicians, lawyers, social workers, and psychologists is required to decrease homophobia and the stigmatization of people representing sexual and gender minorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"14 7","pages":"1853-1867"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11276398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14070122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

(1) Background: This paper presents an analysis of the associations between minority stressors and activism in the population of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in Poland. (2) Methods: The cross-sectional online-based research was conducted among 192 lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) people in two groups: activists (n = 51) and people not engaged in activism (n = 141). Four scales of the Sexual Minority Stress Scale were used: Internalized Homophobia, Expectation of Rejection, Concealment, and Sexual Minority Negative Events Scale. Activism was measured using the Activism Scale and a single item asking about belonging to an activist group. (3) Results: Activists, lesbians, and gays scored significantly higher in the Sexual Minority Negative Events than people not involved in activism and bisexual individuals. Attitude toward LGBT+ activism correlated weakly and positively with Sexual Minority Negative Events and Expectation of Rejection while negatively with Internalized Homophobia. The Network Analysis showed that positive attitudes toward LGBT+ activism, the expectation of rejection, and negative events in minority stress are the most influential variables in the network model, playing a crucial role in the interaction between particular dimensions of minority stress. (4) Conclusions: Prevention and intervention programs should focus on reducing minority stress, especially negative events and rejection, especially among lesbians, gays, and people engaged in LGBT+ activism. The cooperation of politicians, lawyers, social workers, and psychologists is required to decrease homophobia and the stigmatization of people representing sexual and gender minorities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性者的少数群体压力与激进主义之间关系的网络分析。
(1) 背景:本文分析了波兰女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋人群中少数群体压力与激进主义之间的关联。(2) 研究方法:对 192 名女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋者(LGB)进行了横断面在线研究,分为两组:积极分子(n = 51)和非积极分子(n = 141)。使用了性少数群体压力量表的四个量表:内部化同性恋恐惧症、预期被拒绝、隐瞒和性少数群体负面事件量表。激进主义采用激进主义量表和一个询问是否属于激进主义团体的单项进行测量。(3) 结果:激进主义者、女同性恋和男同性恋在性少数群体负面事件中的得分明显高于未参与激进主义活动的人和双性恋者。对 LGBT+ 激进分子的态度与 "性少数群体负面事件 "和 "被拒绝的预期 "呈弱正相关,而与 "内部化同性恋恐惧症 "呈负相关。网络分析显示,对 LGBT+ 激进主义的积极态度、被拒绝的预期和少数群体压力中的负面事件是网络模型中最有影响力的变量,在少数群体压力的特定维度之间的相互作用中起着至关重要的作用。(4) 结论:预防和干预计划应侧重于减少少数群体的压力,尤其是负面事件和排斥,特别是在女同性恋、男同性恋和从事 LGBT+ 活动的人群中。需要政治家、律师、社会工作者和心理学家的合作,以减少对同性恋的仇视以及对性和性别少数群体的污名化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
FOBism Unveiled: Quantifying Assimilative Racism within Asians in the United States. The Mental Suffering of Cocaine-Addicted Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Personality Disorders' Prevalence and Their Association with Psychopathological Symptoms. The Role of Family in the Life Satisfaction of Young Adults: An Ecological-Systemic Perspective. Interculturality in the Development of Technology-Mediated Courses for Massive Health Education: A Systematic Review. The Mediating Role of Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms in the Relationship between Adult Attachment and Quality of Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1