Comprehensive review of the heart failure management guidelines presented by the American College of Cardiology and the current supporting evidence.

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1515/jom-2024-0071
Lia Lazareva, Jay H Shubrook, Milind Dhond
{"title":"Comprehensive review of the heart failure management guidelines presented by the American College of Cardiology and the current supporting evidence.","authors":"Lia Lazareva, Jay H Shubrook, Milind Dhond","doi":"10.1515/jom-2024-0071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that affects the heart's functional capacity, resulting in symptoms such as fatigue, edema, and dyspnea. It affects millions of adults in the United States and presents challenges in optimizing treatment and coordinating care among clinicians. Additionally, the various classifications for HF and limited research on treatment outcomes in heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) further complicate the pharmacological management of patients with this disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this article are to review the pharmacotherapy guidelines for HF provided by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and offer an update on the current trials conducted on these agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The paper includes a post hoc analysis of established randomized controlled trials (RCTs), current RCTs, analysis of HF registries, and the guidelines published by the ACC. The gathering of research began in June 2023 and completed in August 2023. PubMed was utilized with the following search items: \"treatment for HFrEF\" (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), \"treatment for HFmrEF,\" and \"treatment for HFpEF.\" The screening process was completed by one author. The automation tools utilized were \"clinical trials,\" \"randomized control trials,\" and \"five years\". Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and case reports were excluded from the screening process. This review does not include research regarding medical devices, interventional therapies, and lifestyle modifications. Finally, research regarding additional comorbidities, nonpharmacological focused research, and agents not recommended by the ACC are not included in this paper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search began with 6,561 records identified from PubMed, with 407 records screened after automation tools were utilized to filter for \"clinical trials,\" \"randomized control trials,\" \"one year,\" and \"five years\". A total of 22 duplicates were reviewed, 318 were sought for screening after trials from 2019 were removed, and 31 studies were ultimately included in the review. A detailed summary of the most recent recommendations by the ACC are provided. The discussion includes indications, mechanisms of action, side effects, and contraindications for the selected agents. Additionally, recent clinical trials are included to provide evidence on the efficacy of the recommended classes of drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current guidelines for managing HFrEF have been consistent, but there is limited consensus on treating HFmrEF and HFpEF. Large RCTs have provided compelling evidence supporting the use of the recommended pharmacological agents. However, despite the new effective treatment protocols, slow clinical inertia and underoptimization of HF management persist. Thus, it is crucial to synchronize care among clinicians involved in managing patients with this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":36050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2024-0071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that affects the heart's functional capacity, resulting in symptoms such as fatigue, edema, and dyspnea. It affects millions of adults in the United States and presents challenges in optimizing treatment and coordinating care among clinicians. Additionally, the various classifications for HF and limited research on treatment outcomes in heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) further complicate the pharmacological management of patients with this disease.

Objectives: The objectives of this article are to review the pharmacotherapy guidelines for HF provided by the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and offer an update on the current trials conducted on these agents.

Methods: The paper includes a post hoc analysis of established randomized controlled trials (RCTs), current RCTs, analysis of HF registries, and the guidelines published by the ACC. The gathering of research began in June 2023 and completed in August 2023. PubMed was utilized with the following search items: "treatment for HFrEF" (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction), "treatment for HFmrEF," and "treatment for HFpEF." The screening process was completed by one author. The automation tools utilized were "clinical trials," "randomized control trials," and "five years". Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and case reports were excluded from the screening process. This review does not include research regarding medical devices, interventional therapies, and lifestyle modifications. Finally, research regarding additional comorbidities, nonpharmacological focused research, and agents not recommended by the ACC are not included in this paper.

Results: The search began with 6,561 records identified from PubMed, with 407 records screened after automation tools were utilized to filter for "clinical trials," "randomized control trials," "one year," and "five years". A total of 22 duplicates were reviewed, 318 were sought for screening after trials from 2019 were removed, and 31 studies were ultimately included in the review. A detailed summary of the most recent recommendations by the ACC are provided. The discussion includes indications, mechanisms of action, side effects, and contraindications for the selected agents. Additionally, recent clinical trials are included to provide evidence on the efficacy of the recommended classes of drugs.

Conclusions: The current guidelines for managing HFrEF have been consistent, but there is limited consensus on treating HFmrEF and HFpEF. Large RCTs have provided compelling evidence supporting the use of the recommended pharmacological agents. However, despite the new effective treatment protocols, slow clinical inertia and underoptimization of HF management persist. Thus, it is crucial to synchronize care among clinicians involved in managing patients with this disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全面回顾美国心脏病学会提出的心力衰竭管理指南以及当前的支持性证据。
背景:心力衰竭(HF)是一种影响心脏功能的慢性疾病,会导致疲劳、水肿和呼吸困难等症状。它影响着美国数百万成年人,给优化治疗和协调临床医生之间的护理带来了挑战。此外,心力衰竭的分类多种多样,对射血分数中等的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)和射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)治疗效果的研究也很有限,这使该病患者的药物治疗更加复杂:本文旨在回顾美国心脏病学会(ACC)提供的心力衰竭药物治疗指南,并提供当前对这些药物进行试验的最新情况:本文包括对已完成的随机对照试验 (RCT)、当前的 RCT、心房颤动登记分析以及 ACC 发布的指南进行的事后分析。研究收集工作于 2023 年 6 月开始,2023 年 8 月结束。在 PubMed 上使用了以下搜索项:"HFrEF治疗"(射血分数降低的心衰)、"HFmrEF治疗 "和 "HFpEF治疗"。筛选过程由一位作者完成。使用的自动化工具包括 "临床试验"、"随机对照试验 "和 "五年"。筛选过程中排除了荟萃分析、系统综述和病例报告。本综述不包括有关医疗器械、介入疗法和生活方式调整的研究。最后,本文还不包括有关其他合并症的研究、以非药物治疗为重点的研究以及未被美国癌症协会推荐的药物:搜索开始时从 PubMed 上找到了 6,561 条记录,在使用自动化工具过滤 "临床试验"、"随机对照试验"、"一年 "和 "五年 "后,筛选出 407 条记录。共审查了 22 项重复内容,在删除 2019 年的试验后,又寻找了 318 项进行筛选,最终有 31 项研究被纳入审查范围。本文提供了 ACC 最新建议的详细摘要。讨论内容包括所选药物的适应症、作用机制、副作用和禁忌症。此外,还包括最新的临床试验,为推荐药物的疗效提供证据:结论:目前治疗 HFrEF 的指南是一致的,但在治疗 HFmrEF 和 HFpEF 方面共识有限。大型 RCT 研究提供了令人信服的证据,支持使用推荐的药物。然而,尽管有了新的有效治疗方案,但缓慢的临床惰性和心房颤动管理的优化不足依然存在。因此,参与治疗该病患者的临床医生必须同步进行治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
118
期刊最新文献
Comparing cranial suture interdigitation in humans and non-human primates: unearthing links to osteopathic cranial concept. Protecting the profession: lessons from the recent physician scandals. The rise of advanced practice provider independence bills: a misguided attempt to address the physician shortage. Analysis of self-reported confidence in independent prescribing among osteopathic medical graduating seniors. Foot and ankle fellowship-trained osteopathic orthopaedic surgeons: a review, analysis, and understanding of current trends.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1