Relationship between adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs and control of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.06.007
E Esquivel-Prados, E Pareja-Martínez, J P García-Corpas
{"title":"Relationship between adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs and control of type 2 diabetes mellitus.","authors":"E Esquivel-Prados, E Pareja-Martínez, J P García-Corpas","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and objectives: </strong>Poor adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (Adh-OAD) is a risk factor for poor control of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, it is necessary to quantify the Adh-OAD. This quantification is possible through electronic dispensing records from the community pharmacy. The objective was to evaluate the influence of the Adh-OAD on the control of T2DM and the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (%HbA1c) in the patient.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive observational study was conducted in 8 community pharmacies in Granada (Spain). Patients older than 18 years with T2DM and on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) for at least 6 months were included. The main study variables were the control of T2DM, %HbA1c, and the Adh-OAD considering three cut-off points (≥80%, ≥70%, ≥60%). This relationship was studied using multivariate binary logistic regression and multivariate linear regression, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 107 patients were included. The mean age was 70.5 years (SD: 9.7), and 54.2% were men. Eighty-five patients (79.4%) had well-controlled T2DM (mean %HbA1c: 6.5%; SD=0.6). Considering Adh-OAD≥80%, 13.1% (n=14) had a poor adherence and was related to the %HbA1c (β=0.742; p=0.007) and the control of T2DM (OR: 7.327; 95% CI: 1.302-41.241). Poor adherence was found in 9.3% (n=10) considering Adh-OAD≥70% and in 3.7% (n=4) considering Adh-OAD≥60%. In both cases, a statistically significant relationship was found between Adh-OAD and the %HbA1c and between Adh-OAD and the control of T2DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adh-OAD influenced the %HbA1c in patients with T2DM and the control of their disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.06.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Poor adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (Adh-OAD) is a risk factor for poor control of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, it is necessary to quantify the Adh-OAD. This quantification is possible through electronic dispensing records from the community pharmacy. The objective was to evaluate the influence of the Adh-OAD on the control of T2DM and the percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (%HbA1c) in the patient.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive observational study was conducted in 8 community pharmacies in Granada (Spain). Patients older than 18 years with T2DM and on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) for at least 6 months were included. The main study variables were the control of T2DM, %HbA1c, and the Adh-OAD considering three cut-off points (≥80%, ≥70%, ≥60%). This relationship was studied using multivariate binary logistic regression and multivariate linear regression, respectively.

Results: A total of 107 patients were included. The mean age was 70.5 years (SD: 9.7), and 54.2% were men. Eighty-five patients (79.4%) had well-controlled T2DM (mean %HbA1c: 6.5%; SD=0.6). Considering Adh-OAD≥80%, 13.1% (n=14) had a poor adherence and was related to the %HbA1c (β=0.742; p=0.007) and the control of T2DM (OR: 7.327; 95% CI: 1.302-41.241). Poor adherence was found in 9.3% (n=10) considering Adh-OAD≥70% and in 3.7% (n=4) considering Adh-OAD≥60%. In both cases, a statistically significant relationship was found between Adh-OAD and the %HbA1c and between Adh-OAD and the control of T2DM.

Conclusions: Adh-OAD influenced the %HbA1c in patients with T2DM and the control of their disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坚持服用口服抗糖尿病药物与控制 2 型糖尿病之间的关系。
导言和目标:口服抗糖尿病药物(Adh-OAD)依从性差是 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)控制不佳的一个风险因素。因此,有必要对 Adh-OAD 进行量化。通过社区药房的电子配药记录可以进行量化。目的是评估 Adh-OAD 对 T2DM 控制和患者糖化血红蛋白百分比(%HbA1c)的影响:在格拉纳达(西班牙)的 8 家社区药房开展了一项横断面描述性观察研究。研究对象包括 18 岁以上的 T2DM 患者,这些患者至少服用过 6 个月的口服抗糖尿病药物 (OAD)。研究的主要变量是 T2DM 控制率、血红蛋白 A1c 百分比和 Adh-OAD,考虑了三个截断点(≥80%、≥70%、≥60%)。分别采用多变量二元逻辑回归和多变量线性回归对这一关系进行了研究:共纳入 107 名患者。平均年龄为 70.5 岁(SD:9.7),54.2% 为男性。85名患者(79.4%)的 T2DM 控制良好(平均 HbA1c 百分比:6.5%;SD=0.6)。考虑到 Adh-OAD≥80% 的患者,13.1%(14 人)的依从性较差,这与 HbA1c%(β=0.742;P=0.007)和 T2DM 控制情况(OR:7.327;95% CI:1.302-41.241)有关。Adh-OAD≥70% 的患者中有 9.3%(10 人)依从性较差,Adh-OAD≥60% 的患者中有 3.7%(4 人)依从性较差。在这两种情况下,均发现 Adh-OAD 与 HbA1c 百分比之间以及 Adh-OAD 与 T2DM 控制率之间存在显著的统计学关系:结论:Adh-OAD对T2DM患者的血红蛋白A1c%及其病情控制有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
[A practical model to implement the patient participation in tertiary hospitals (ICE model)]. [Integrated social value generated in a specialized hospital for chronic patients]. Determinants of citizens' choice between public and private hospitals. Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1