Pediatric Hospital Medicine Fellows' Perspectives on Autonomy Through Time.

Q1 Nursing Hospital pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2024-007855
Valerie Jurgens, Jamie Librizzi, Neha Shah, Priti Bhansali, Dorene F Balmer, Jimmy Beck
{"title":"Pediatric Hospital Medicine Fellows' Perspectives on Autonomy Through Time.","authors":"Valerie Jurgens, Jamie Librizzi, Neha Shah, Priti Bhansali, Dorene F Balmer, Jimmy Beck","doi":"10.1542/hpeds.2024-007855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Promoting autonomy is at the core of fellowship education. Pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) fellowship programs are relatively new, and many supervising physicians are not trained on how to promote fellow autonomy. Moreover, no studies have explored fellows' perception of autonomy throughout training. To fill this gap, we explored PHM fellows' perceptions of autonomy throughout training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PHM fellows starting fellowship in July 2021 were recruited to participate in a longitudinal qualitative study. Using self-determination theory as a sensitizing framework, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with 14 fellows throughout fellowship. Incoming data were iteratively analyzed, and codes were created from patterns in the data. Coded data were clustered into themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes developed: (1) at the beginning of fellowship, fellows valued direct observation and close supervision from their attending. (2) Initially, fellows felt pressured to make the identical clinical decision as their attending, but over the course of training, they realized their autonomous decisions could coexist with different decisions from their attending physicians. (3) At first, fellows desired attending presence to support and guide their decision making. Over time, fellows desired a coach who could provide valuable formative feedback. (4) Because of the hierarchical nature of medicine, conversations between fellows and attending physicians about autonomy were challenging to initiate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fellows' perceptions of autonomy change throughout fellowship, which should be taken into consideration as provisions of autonomy evolve through training. Our findings can inform PHM fellowship curricula and professional development around the promotion of autonomy in fellowship.</p>","PeriodicalId":38180,"journal":{"name":"Hospital pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"682-689"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2024-007855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Promoting autonomy is at the core of fellowship education. Pediatric hospital medicine (PHM) fellowship programs are relatively new, and many supervising physicians are not trained on how to promote fellow autonomy. Moreover, no studies have explored fellows' perception of autonomy throughout training. To fill this gap, we explored PHM fellows' perceptions of autonomy throughout training.

Methods: PHM fellows starting fellowship in July 2021 were recruited to participate in a longitudinal qualitative study. Using self-determination theory as a sensitizing framework, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with 14 fellows throughout fellowship. Incoming data were iteratively analyzed, and codes were created from patterns in the data. Coded data were clustered into themes.

Results: Four themes developed: (1) at the beginning of fellowship, fellows valued direct observation and close supervision from their attending. (2) Initially, fellows felt pressured to make the identical clinical decision as their attending, but over the course of training, they realized their autonomous decisions could coexist with different decisions from their attending physicians. (3) At first, fellows desired attending presence to support and guide their decision making. Over time, fellows desired a coach who could provide valuable formative feedback. (4) Because of the hierarchical nature of medicine, conversations between fellows and attending physicians about autonomy were challenging to initiate.

Conclusions: Fellows' perceptions of autonomy change throughout fellowship, which should be taken into consideration as provisions of autonomy evolve through training. Our findings can inform PHM fellowship curricula and professional development around the promotion of autonomy in fellowship.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科医院医学研究员对自主性的看法。
目标:促进自主性是研究员教育的核心。儿科医院医学(PHM)研究金项目相对较新,许多指导医生没有接受过如何促进研究员自主性的培训。此外,还没有研究探讨过研究员在整个培训过程中对自主性的看法。为了填补这一空白,我们探讨了PHM研究员在整个培训过程中对自主性的看法:我们招募了将于 2021 年 7 月开始进修的 PHM 学员参与一项纵向定性研究。作者使用自我决定理论作为感性框架,在整个研究期间对14名研究员进行了半结构式访谈。对收到的数据进行了反复分析,并根据数据中的模式创建了代码。结果:形成了四个主题:(1)在研究金开始时,研究员重视主治医生的直接观察和密切监督。(2)最初,研究员感到有压力,必须做出与主治医生相同的临床决定,但在培训过程中,他们意识到自己的自主决定可以与主治医生的不同决定并存。(3) 起初,学员们希望主治医生能够支持和指导他们的决策。随着时间的推移,研究员们希望能有一个能提供有价值的形成性反馈的教练。(4) 由于医学的等级性质,研究员与主治医生之间关于自主权的对话很难启动:研究员对自主权的看法在整个研究期间会发生变化,这一点应在培训期间自主权规定的演变中加以考虑。我们的研究结果可为 PHM 研究员课程和专业发展提供信息,促进研究员自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital pediatrics
Hospital pediatrics Nursing-Pediatrics
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
204
期刊最新文献
Testing and Treatment Thresholds for Pediatric Pneumonia in the Emergency Department. It's More Complicated Than Interpreter Use: Improving Care for Non-English-Speaking Families. Factors Associated With Nirsevimab Uptake in Healthy Newborns. Nirsevimab Administration During the Birth Hospitalization. Extravasation Identification and Management in Neonates and Pediatrics: A Cross Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1