Polish cross-cultural adaptation of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory as an instrument for the post-intervention measurement of change after Gamma Knife treatment.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Polish Journal of Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-07-25
Katarzyna Bieńkowska, Barbara Kostecka, Mirosław Ząbek, Andrzej Kokoszka, Sebastian Dzierzęcki, Ewelina Cichoń, Grzegorz Turek
{"title":"Polish cross-cultural adaptation of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory as an instrument for the post-intervention measurement of change after Gamma Knife treatment.","authors":"Katarzyna Bieńkowska, Barbara Kostecka, Mirosław Ząbek, Andrzej Kokoszka, Sebastian Dzierzęcki, Ewelina Cichoń, Grzegorz Turek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is one of questionnaires for the measurement of treatment success, which is widely used in patients after vestibular schwannoma treatment.&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; This study aimed to adapt the GBI originally written in English to Polish conditions and to evaluate its psychometric properties.&lt;b&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; The Polish version of the GBI used in this study was prepared by a bilingual translator, and its accuracy was ensured by back-translation. To identify the structure of the Polish version of the GBI, exploratory factor analysis was performed. The reliability was determined using Cronbach's α. To verify the validity, correlation analysis was conducted between the domains of GBI and other questionnaires.&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original 3-factor model is not a good fit for the data. The exploratory factor analysis was performed and identified 4 factors. The total variance of the 4-factor solution was 66.25%. The Cronbach's α calculated for the total GBI reached 0.91. Our analysis confirmed significant weak or moderate correlations between tools for the measurement of general QoL (AQoL-8D: r = 0.411; p = 0.000) and health-related QoL (PANQOL: r = 0.367; p = 0.000; a tool dedicated for patients with VS), well-being (WHO-5: r = 0.432; p = 0.000), hearing and tinnitus (STS: r = -0.217; p = 0.016).&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; This study reports the first adaptation of the GBI for patients with VS to Polish conditions. The results demonstrated that the Polish version of the GBI is a reliable and valid questionnaire that can be used to measure treatment success.</p>","PeriodicalId":42608,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> The Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) is one of questionnaires for the measurement of treatment success, which is widely used in patients after vestibular schwannoma treatment.<b>Aim:</b> This study aimed to adapt the GBI originally written in English to Polish conditions and to evaluate its psychometric properties.<b>Material and methods:</b> The Polish version of the GBI used in this study was prepared by a bilingual translator, and its accuracy was ensured by back-translation. To identify the structure of the Polish version of the GBI, exploratory factor analysis was performed. The reliability was determined using Cronbach's α. To verify the validity, correlation analysis was conducted between the domains of GBI and other questionnaires.<b>Results:</b> The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the original 3-factor model is not a good fit for the data. The exploratory factor analysis was performed and identified 4 factors. The total variance of the 4-factor solution was 66.25%. The Cronbach's α calculated for the total GBI reached 0.91. Our analysis confirmed significant weak or moderate correlations between tools for the measurement of general QoL (AQoL-8D: r = 0.411; p = 0.000) and health-related QoL (PANQOL: r = 0.367; p = 0.000; a tool dedicated for patients with VS), well-being (WHO-5: r = 0.432; p = 0.000), hearing and tinnitus (STS: r = -0.217; p = 0.016).<b>Conclusions:</b> This study reports the first adaptation of the GBI for patients with VS to Polish conditions. The results demonstrated that the Polish version of the GBI is a reliable and valid questionnaire that can be used to measure treatment success.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰对格拉斯哥效益量表进行跨文化改编,将其作为伽马刀治疗后测量变化的工具。
<b>简介:</b>格拉斯哥效益量表(Glasgow Benefit Inventory,GBI)是测量治疗成功率的问卷之一,广泛用于前庭裂隙瘤治疗后的患者。<b>目的:</b>本研究旨在将最初用英语编写的 GBI 改编为波兰语,并评估其心理测量特性。为了确定波兰语版 GBI 的结构,进行了探索性因子分析。为了验证其有效性,我们对 GBI 的各个领域与其他问卷进行了相关性分析。探索性因子分析确定了 4 个因子。4 个因子解的总方差为 66.25%。计算得出的总 GBI 的 Cronbach's α 达到 0.91。我们的分析证实,一般 QoL 测量工具(AQoL-8D:r = 0.411;p = 0.000)和健康相关 QoL 测量工具(PANQOL:r = 0.367;p = 0.000;专为 VS 患者设计的工具)、幸福感(WHO-5:r = 0.432;p = 0.000)、听力和耳鸣(STS:r = -0.217;p = 0.016)。结果表明,波兰语版的 GBI 是一份可靠有效的问卷,可用于衡量治疗的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology
Polish Journal of Otolaryngology OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Memory Load Test - A Concept for Cognitive Reserve Evaluation with Auditory Perception. Contemporary directions in the therapy of sensory hearing loss. Polish cross-cultural adaptation of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory as an instrument for the post-intervention measurement of change after Gamma Knife treatment. Soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck region: clinical and histopathological study of 39 patients. Polish Translation and Validation of the SCHNOS (Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey) Questionnaire.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1