Liberal policies does not mean equitable policies: Latinx families' experiences navigating social policies in Oregon and California.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1037/cdp0000699
Guadalupe Díaz Lara
{"title":"Liberal policies does not mean equitable policies: Latinx families' experiences navigating social policies in Oregon and California.","authors":"Guadalupe Díaz Lara","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The United States government has implemented various social policies (e.g., Medicare) to support children and families (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2023). An emerging body of research seems to indicate that many of these programs are being underutilized by Latinx families even though they are sorely needed. Latinx families are often framed as undeserving, taking advantage of social policies, and as a criminal threat to the United States (Baranauskas & Stowell, 2022). Drawing on cultural stress theory (Salas-Wright & Schwartz, 2019), the present study explores how the deficit framing of Latinx families influences how they navigate social policies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study draws on data from four qualitative projects across Oregon and California that explored the experiences of Latinx families accessing services to support their families.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that Latinx families experience multiple stressors when navigating social policies or programs (e.g., shame/fear and racism) for their families. These stressors discourage Latinx families from accessing social programs, which exacerbates disparities in the health, development, and learning of Latinx children and families.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from this study can further inform advocacy efforts to create meaningful systemic changes that reduce inequities and call out discrimination/racism within our policy system. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000699","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The United States government has implemented various social policies (e.g., Medicare) to support children and families (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2023). An emerging body of research seems to indicate that many of these programs are being underutilized by Latinx families even though they are sorely needed. Latinx families are often framed as undeserving, taking advantage of social policies, and as a criminal threat to the United States (Baranauskas & Stowell, 2022). Drawing on cultural stress theory (Salas-Wright & Schwartz, 2019), the present study explores how the deficit framing of Latinx families influences how they navigate social policies.

Method: This study draws on data from four qualitative projects across Oregon and California that explored the experiences of Latinx families accessing services to support their families.

Results: Findings indicate that Latinx families experience multiple stressors when navigating social policies or programs (e.g., shame/fear and racism) for their families. These stressors discourage Latinx families from accessing social programs, which exacerbates disparities in the health, development, and learning of Latinx children and families.

Conclusions: Findings from this study can further inform advocacy efforts to create meaningful systemic changes that reduce inequities and call out discrimination/racism within our policy system. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自由政策并不意味着公平政策:拉美裔家庭在俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州驾驭社会政策的经验。
目标:美国政府实施了各种社会政策(如医疗保险)来支持儿童和家庭(美国卫生与公众服务部,2023 年)。一项新出现的研究似乎表明,尽管拉美裔家庭非常需要这些计划,但他们对其中许多计划的利用率却很低。拉美裔家庭往往被认为是不值得拥有的、利用社会政策的,以及对美国的犯罪威胁(Baranauskas & Stowell, 2022)。本研究借鉴文化压力理论(Salas-Wright & Schwartz, 2019),探讨了拉美裔家庭的赤字框架如何影响他们驾驭社会政策:本研究借鉴了俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州四个定性项目的数据,这些项目探讨了拉美裔家庭获取服务以支持其家庭的经历:结果:研究结果表明,拉美裔家庭在为自己的家庭寻求社会政策或计划(如羞耻/恐惧和种族主义)时经历了多重压力。这些压力阻碍了拉美裔家庭利用社会项目,从而加剧了拉美裔儿童和家庭在健康、发展和学习方面的差距:本研究的结果可为宣传工作提供进一步的信息,以创造有意义的系统性变革,减少不平等现象,并在我们的政策体系中唤醒歧视/种族主义。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
期刊最新文献
Criminality, foreignness, and illness stereotypes underlie racial minorities' social identity threat wearing different face masks during COVID-19. Latent profiles of perceived discrimination, bicultural stress, and negative context of reception and associations with mental health in a sample of Hispanic and Somali adolescents. Validation of the Coping With Discrimination Scale among Arab/Middle Eastern North African Americans. Voices and experiences of Moroccan-heritage women and men in Spain: Understanding affective reactions to injustice through mixed-methods. Responding responsively: Benefits of responsive racism-specific support for Black college students in same- and cross-race friendships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1