Numerical assessment of induced electric fields in a worker's hand with commonly used metallic implants under exposure to low frequency magnetic fields.

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Radiological Protection Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1088/1361-6498/ad66dc
Gernot Schmid, Pia Schneeweiss, Rene Hirtl, Tobias Jhala, Theodoros Samaras
{"title":"Numerical assessment of induced electric fields in a worker's hand with commonly used metallic implants under exposure to low frequency magnetic fields.","authors":"Gernot Schmid, Pia Schneeweiss, Rene Hirtl, Tobias Jhala, Theodoros Samaras","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ad66dc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The European Union's Workers' Directive 2013/35/EU on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields specifies action levels (ALs) for external electric and magnetic fields, which should protect against induced tissue-internal electric field strength<i>E</i><sub>i</sub>above the exposure limit values, the latter being defined in order to prevent tissue stimulation at low frequencies. However, although 2013/35/EU explicitly calls for the protection of 'workers at particular risk' (including workers with metallic implants), the AL specified in the Directive have been derived under the assumption that there are no metallic parts present inside the body. Therefore, in the present work, we analysed the situation of a worker's hand and forearm bearing metallic implants (Herbert screw and volar radius plate) used for osteosynthesis after the most common bone fractures of the hand/forearm, exposed to low frequency magnetic fields. The uniform exposure of the whole hand and forearm as well as the exposure to a specific and widely used device, a deactivator for single-use labels of acousto-magnetic electronic article surveillance systems, were considered based on numerical computations using a high-resolution anatomical hand and forearm model. The results obtained indicated that the maximum induced electric field strength averaged in a volume of 2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm cube was higher in the presence of the metallic implants by a factor of up to 4.2 for bone tissue and 2.3 for soft tissue compared with the case without an implant. Hence, it is obvious that the local induced electric field strengths may be substantially increased by the implants. The extent of this increase, however, is highly dependent on the implant's position inside the body, the implant's geometry, and the field distribution and orientation with respect to the anatomical structure and the implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ad66dc","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Union's Workers' Directive 2013/35/EU on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to electromagnetic fields specifies action levels (ALs) for external electric and magnetic fields, which should protect against induced tissue-internal electric field strengthEiabove the exposure limit values, the latter being defined in order to prevent tissue stimulation at low frequencies. However, although 2013/35/EU explicitly calls for the protection of 'workers at particular risk' (including workers with metallic implants), the AL specified in the Directive have been derived under the assumption that there are no metallic parts present inside the body. Therefore, in the present work, we analysed the situation of a worker's hand and forearm bearing metallic implants (Herbert screw and volar radius plate) used for osteosynthesis after the most common bone fractures of the hand/forearm, exposed to low frequency magnetic fields. The uniform exposure of the whole hand and forearm as well as the exposure to a specific and widely used device, a deactivator for single-use labels of acousto-magnetic electronic article surveillance systems, were considered based on numerical computations using a high-resolution anatomical hand and forearm model. The results obtained indicated that the maximum induced electric field strength averaged in a volume of 2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm cube was higher in the presence of the metallic implants by a factor of up to 4.2 for bone tissue and 2.3 for soft tissue compared with the case without an implant. Hence, it is obvious that the local induced electric field strengths may be substantially increased by the implants. The extent of this increase, however, is highly dependent on the implant's position inside the body, the implant's geometry, and the field distribution and orientation with respect to the anatomical structure and the implant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在低频磁场作用下,对工人手部植入常用金属植入物的感应电场进行数值评估。
欧盟关于工人暴露于电磁场的最低健康和安全要求的第 2013/35/EU 号工人指令规定了外部电场和磁场的行动水平 (AL),应防止诱导组织内部电场强度 Ei 超过暴露限值 (ELV),后者的定义是为了防止组织受到低频刺激。然而,尽管 2013/35/EU 号指令明确要求保护 "有特殊风险的工人"(包括使用金属植入物的工人),但指令中规定的 AL 值是在假定人体内部没有金属部件的情况下得出的。因此,在本研究中,我们分析了工人的手和前臂在低频磁场中暴露的情况,该工人的手和前臂带有金属植入物(赫伯特螺钉和桡骨外板),用于手/前臂最常见骨折后的骨合成。在使用高分辨率手部/前臂解剖模型进行数值计算的基础上,考虑了整个手部和前臂的均匀暴露,以及对一种广泛使用的特殊装置(用于声磁电子物品监视系统 (AM-EAS) 一次性标签的失活器)的暴露。 结果表明,与没有植入物的情况相比,在 2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm 的立方体体积中平均存在金属植入物时,骨组织和软组织的最大感应电场强度分别高出 4.2 和 2.3 倍。因此,植入物显然会大幅增加局部感应电场强度。不过,这种增加的程度在很大程度上取决于植入物在体内的位置、植入物的几何形状以及相对于解剖结构和植入物的电场分布和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
期刊最新文献
Assessing radiation exposure of fingers of PET/CTtechnologists during 18F-FDG procedures usingactive extremity dosimeters: A single-center study. Descriptive overview of AI applications in x-ray imaging and radiotherapy. How much resources are reasonable to spend on radiological protection? Distribution of plutonium and radium in the human heart. Doses from ionising radiation in paediatric cardiac catheterisations in Norway 1975-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1