Correlates of Transitioning from In-Person to Telemedicine Outpatient Neurology Clinic Visits.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0326
Sooyeol Park, Kevin Callison, Michele Longo, Brigham Walker
{"title":"Correlates of Transitioning from In-Person to Telemedicine Outpatient Neurology Clinic Visits.","authors":"Sooyeol Park, Kevin Callison, Michele Longo, Brigham Walker","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telemedicine adoption, impacting appointment no-show rates. This study examines neurology appointment preferences among individuals with previous no-shows. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed transitions between in-person and telemedicine modalities at the Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences from August 2020 to February 2021 by race, sex, and insurance type. Logistic regression was used to assess which individual characteristics were associated with switching modalities. <b>Results:</b> A total of 118 patients were included. Transitions to telemedicine visits were significantly higher for female (odds ratio [OR] = 1.868, <i>p</i> = 0.051), Medicaid (OR = 0.433, <i>p</i> = 0.035), and Medicare (OR = 0.228, <i>p</i> = 0.001) beneficiaries compared with males and those with private coverage. Telemedicine to in-person transitions were significantly higher for Medicaid compared with private coverage (OR = 8.133, <i>p</i> = 0.018). <b>Discussion:</b> Females are more likely to switch to telemedicine following an in-person no-show, whereas Medicare beneficiaries are less likely. Medicaid beneficiaries are more likely to revert to in-person appointments. Telemedicine may enhance equitable neurological care, particularly because of its high utilization among females.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated telemedicine adoption, impacting appointment no-show rates. This study examines neurology appointment preferences among individuals with previous no-shows. Methods: We analyzed transitions between in-person and telemedicine modalities at the Tulane Center for Clinical Neurosciences from August 2020 to February 2021 by race, sex, and insurance type. Logistic regression was used to assess which individual characteristics were associated with switching modalities. Results: A total of 118 patients were included. Transitions to telemedicine visits were significantly higher for female (odds ratio [OR] = 1.868, p = 0.051), Medicaid (OR = 0.433, p = 0.035), and Medicare (OR = 0.228, p = 0.001) beneficiaries compared with males and those with private coverage. Telemedicine to in-person transitions were significantly higher for Medicaid compared with private coverage (OR = 8.133, p = 0.018). Discussion: Females are more likely to switch to telemedicine following an in-person no-show, whereas Medicare beneficiaries are less likely. Medicaid beneficiaries are more likely to revert to in-person appointments. Telemedicine may enhance equitable neurological care, particularly because of its high utilization among females.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经病学门诊就诊从面对面转为远程医疗的相关因素。
前言COVID-19 大流行加速了远程医疗的应用,影响了预约缺席率。本研究调查了曾出现过预约缺席情况的患者对神经内科预约的偏好。方法:我们按种族、性别和保险类型分析了 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 2 月期间杜兰大学临床神经科学中心面诊和远程医疗模式之间的转换。使用逻辑回归评估哪些个人特征与转换模式相关。结果:共纳入 118 名患者。与男性和私人保险受益人相比,女性(几率比 [OR] = 1.868,p = 0.051)、医疗补助受益人(OR = 0.433,p = 0.035)和医疗保险受益人(OR = 0.228,p = 0.001)转向远程医疗就诊的比例明显更高。与私人保险受益人相比,医疗补助受益人从远程医疗转为面对面治疗的比例明显更高(OR = 8.133,p = 0.018)。讨论:女性更有可能在当面就诊无效后转为远程医疗,而医疗补助受益人则更不可能。医疗补助受益人更有可能重新选择面对面预约。远程医疗可能会提高神经病学护理的公平性,尤其是因为其在女性中的高使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in Telehealth Offer and Use among U.S. Adults: 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth Services in Primary Care. Examination of Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Virtual Clinic Experience During COVID-19 in MNGHA, Saudi Arabia. Practical Experience with the Use of Electronic Headache Diaries and Video Consultations in Migraine Care from a Longitudinal Cohort Study. Correlates of Transitioning from In-Person to Telemedicine Outpatient Neurology Clinic Visits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1