Stimulus-related oscillatory brain activity discriminates hoarding disorder from OCD and healthy controls

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108848
Jessica Sanches Braga Figueira , Elizabeth A. Chapman , Estelle N. Ayomen , Andreas Keil , Natasha Tracy , Carol A. Mathews
{"title":"Stimulus-related oscillatory brain activity discriminates hoarding disorder from OCD and healthy controls","authors":"Jessica Sanches Braga Figueira ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Chapman ,&nbsp;Estelle N. Ayomen ,&nbsp;Andreas Keil ,&nbsp;Natasha Tracy ,&nbsp;Carol A. Mathews","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2024.108848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hoarding disorder (HD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are highly comorbid and genetically related, but their similarities and differences at the neural level are not well characterized. The present study examined the time-frequency information contained in stimulus-related EEG data as participants worked on a visual flanker task. Three groups were included: participants diagnosed with HD (N = 33), OCD (N = 26), and healthy controls (N = 35). Permutation-controlled mass-univariate analyses found no differences between groups in terms of the magnitude of the oscillatory responses. Differences between groups were found selectively for phase-based measures (phase-locking across trials and across sensors) in time ranges well after those consistent with initial visuocortical processes, in the alpha (10 Hz) as well as theta and beta frequency bands, centered around 6 Hz and 15 Hz, respectively. Specifically, HD showed attenuated phase locking in theta and alpha compared to OCD and HC, while OCD showed heightened inter-site phase locking in alpha/beta. Including age as a covariate attenuated, but did not eliminate, the group differences. These findings point to signatures of cortical dynamics and cortical communication task processing that are unique to HD, and which are specifically present during higher-order visual cognition such as stimulus-response mapping, response selection, and action monitoring.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 108848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051124001078","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hoarding disorder (HD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are highly comorbid and genetically related, but their similarities and differences at the neural level are not well characterized. The present study examined the time-frequency information contained in stimulus-related EEG data as participants worked on a visual flanker task. Three groups were included: participants diagnosed with HD (N = 33), OCD (N = 26), and healthy controls (N = 35). Permutation-controlled mass-univariate analyses found no differences between groups in terms of the magnitude of the oscillatory responses. Differences between groups were found selectively for phase-based measures (phase-locking across trials and across sensors) in time ranges well after those consistent with initial visuocortical processes, in the alpha (10 Hz) as well as theta and beta frequency bands, centered around 6 Hz and 15 Hz, respectively. Specifically, HD showed attenuated phase locking in theta and alpha compared to OCD and HC, while OCD showed heightened inter-site phase locking in alpha/beta. Including age as a covariate attenuated, but did not eliminate, the group differences. These findings point to signatures of cortical dynamics and cortical communication task processing that are unique to HD, and which are specifically present during higher-order visual cognition such as stimulus-response mapping, response selection, and action monitoring.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与刺激相关的大脑振荡活动可将囤积症与强迫症和健康对照组区分开来。
囤积症(HD)和强迫症(OCD)具有高度的并发性和遗传相关性,但它们在神经水平上的异同尚未得到很好的描述。本研究考察了参与者在完成视觉侧翼任务时与刺激相关的脑电图数据所包含的时间频率信息。研究对象包括三组:被诊断为 HD 的参与者(33 人)、强迫症患者(26 人)和健康对照组(35 人)。通过排列控制的大规模单变量分析发现,各组之间在振荡反应的幅度方面没有差异。在α(10Hz)以及θ和β频段(分别以6Hz和15Hz为中心)中,基于相位的测量(跨试验和跨传感器的相位锁定)在与最初视觉皮层过程一致的时间范围之后很长时间内发现了组间差异。具体来说,与强迫症和高危人群相比,HD在θ和α频段表现出的锁相减弱,而强迫症则在α/β频段表现出更强的部位间锁相。将年龄作为协变量会减弱但不会消除组间差异。这些研究结果表明,皮质动态和皮质通信任务处理是 HD 独有的特征,特别是在刺激-反应映射、反应选择和行动监控等高阶视觉认知过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
期刊最新文献
Visual mismatch negativity is more than the sum of microsequences. Expectation to rewards modulates learning emotional words: Evidence from a hierarchical Bayesian model Multimodal neuroimaging of hierarchical cognitive control Face emojis vs. Non-face emojis: Exploring neural mechanisms in text processing Multiple risk markers for increases in depression symptoms across two years: Evidence from the reward positivity and the error-related negativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1