What works in implementing shared medical appointments for patients with diabetes in primary care to enhance reach: a qualitative comparative analysis from the Invested in Diabetes study.

Jodi Summers Holtrop, Dennis Gurfinkel, Andrea Nederveld, Julia Reedy, Claude Rubinson, Bethany Matthews Kwan
{"title":"What works in implementing shared medical appointments for patients with diabetes in primary care to enhance reach: a qualitative comparative analysis from the Invested in Diabetes study.","authors":"Jodi Summers Holtrop, Dennis Gurfinkel, Andrea Nederveld, Julia Reedy, Claude Rubinson, Bethany Matthews Kwan","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00608-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes is a serious public health problem affecting 37.3 million Americans. Diabetes shared medical appointments (SMAs) are an effective strategy for providing diabetes self-management support and education in primary care. However, practices delivering SMAs experience implementation challenges. This analysis examined conditions associated with successful practice implementation of diabetes SMAs in the context of participation in a pragmatic trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods study using qualitative and quantitative data collected from interviews, observations, surveys, and practice-reported data, guided by the practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM). Data were analyzed using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Successful implementation was defined as meeting patient recruitment targets (Reach) during the study period. Participants were clinicians and staff members from 22 primary care practices in Colorado and Missouri, USA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first necessary condition identified from the QCA was the presence of additional resources for patients with diabetes in the practice. Within practices that had these additional resources, we found that a sufficiency condition was the presence of an effective key person to make things happen with the SMAs. A second QCA was conducted to determine conditions underlying the presence of the effective key person (often performing functions of an implementation champion), which revealed factors including low or managed employee turnover, a strong baseline practice culture, and previous experience delivering SMAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Identification of key factors necessary and sufficient for implementation of new care processes is important to enhance patient access to evidence-based interventions. This study suggests that practice features and resources have important implications for implementation of diabetes SMAs. There may be opportunities to support practices with SMA implementation by enabling the presence of skilled implementation champions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered at clinicaltrials.gov under trial ID NCT03590041, registered on July 18, 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00608-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes is a serious public health problem affecting 37.3 million Americans. Diabetes shared medical appointments (SMAs) are an effective strategy for providing diabetes self-management support and education in primary care. However, practices delivering SMAs experience implementation challenges. This analysis examined conditions associated with successful practice implementation of diabetes SMAs in the context of participation in a pragmatic trial.

Methods: Mixed methods study using qualitative and quantitative data collected from interviews, observations, surveys, and practice-reported data, guided by the practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM). Data were analyzed using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Successful implementation was defined as meeting patient recruitment targets (Reach) during the study period. Participants were clinicians and staff members from 22 primary care practices in Colorado and Missouri, USA.

Results: The first necessary condition identified from the QCA was the presence of additional resources for patients with diabetes in the practice. Within practices that had these additional resources, we found that a sufficiency condition was the presence of an effective key person to make things happen with the SMAs. A second QCA was conducted to determine conditions underlying the presence of the effective key person (often performing functions of an implementation champion), which revealed factors including low or managed employee turnover, a strong baseline practice culture, and previous experience delivering SMAs.

Conclusions: Identification of key factors necessary and sufficient for implementation of new care processes is important to enhance patient access to evidence-based interventions. This study suggests that practice features and resources have important implications for implementation of diabetes SMAs. There may be opportunities to support practices with SMA implementation by enabling the presence of skilled implementation champions.

Trial registration: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov under trial ID NCT03590041, registered on July 18, 2018.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在基层医疗机构实施糖尿病患者共享医疗预约以提高覆盖率的有效方法:糖尿病投资研究的定性比较分析。
背景:糖尿病是一个严重的公共健康问题,影响着 3730 万美国人。糖尿病共享医疗预约(SMA)是在初级保健中提供糖尿病自我管理支持和教育的有效策略。然而,提供 SMA 的医疗机构在实施过程中遇到了挑战。这项分析研究了在参与一项实用性试验的背景下,成功实施糖尿病SMA的相关条件:方法:混合方法研究,使用从访谈、观察、调查和实践报告数据中收集的定性和定量数据,以实用、稳健的实施和可持续性模型(PRISM)为指导。数据采用定性比较分析法(QCA)进行分析。成功实施的定义是在研究期间达到了患者招募目标(Reach)。参与者为来自美国科罗拉多州和密苏里州 22 家初级保健机构的临床医生和工作人员:结果:根据 QCA 确定的第一个必要条件是诊所为糖尿病患者提供额外资源。在拥有这些额外资源的医疗机构中,我们发现一个充分的条件是有一个有效的关键人物来实现 SMA。我们还进行了第二项质量控制评估,以确定有效关键人物(通常履行实施倡导者的职能)存在的基本条件,结果发现了一些因素,包括低员工流失率或员工流失率受控、强大的基线实践文化以及以前实施 SMA 的经验:结论:确定实施新护理流程的必要和充分的关键因素,对于提高患者获得循证干预的机会非常重要。本研究表明,实践特点和资源对实施糖尿病SMA具有重要影响。通过培养熟练的实施倡导者,可能有机会为SMA的实施提供支持:注册于 clinicaltrials.gov,试验 ID NCT03590041,注册日期为 2018 年 7 月 18 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Audit and feedback is an effective implementation strategy to increase fidelity to a multi-component labor induction protocol designed to reduce obstetric inequities. Development of an implementation intervention to promote adoption of the COMFORT clinical practice guideline for peripartum pain management: a qualitative study. The system can change: a feasibility study of a doula-clinician collaborative at a large tertiary hospital in the United States. Development and evaluation of an implementation strategy to increase HPV vaccination among underserved youth across Texas: a protocol paper. Impact of learning health systems on cross-system collaboration between youth legal and community mental health systems: a type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1