Audit and feedback is an effective implementation strategy to increase fidelity to a multi-component labor induction protocol designed to reduce obstetric inequities.

Rebecca F Hamm, Sreya Pattipati, Lisa D Levine, Samuel Parry, Sindhu K Srinivas, Rinad S Beidas
{"title":"Audit and feedback is an effective implementation strategy to increase fidelity to a multi-component labor induction protocol designed to reduce obstetric inequities.","authors":"Rebecca F Hamm, Sreya Pattipati, Lisa D Levine, Samuel Parry, Sindhu K Srinivas, Rinad S Beidas","doi":"10.1186/s43058-024-00681-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have demonstrated that standardizing labor induction (IOL), often with the use of protocols, may reduce racial inequities in obstetrics. IOL protocols are complex, multi-component interventions. To target identified implementation barriers, audit and feedback (A&F) was selected as an implementation strategy. Here, we aimed to understand the acceptability and effect of A&F on fidelity to this complex intervention through quantitative and qualitative approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (10/2018-12/2022) compared 2 years before (PRE) to 2 years after (POST) implementation of an IOL protocol at two sites. Fidelity to each of 8 specific protocol components was collected via chart review. During the POST period, unit-aggregated A&F reports were distributed via email every 3 months to site clinicians. Reports tracked fidelity to protocol components over time. For this analysis, we compared component fidelity PRE to POST-implementation. Additionally, during the POST period, we compared fidelity by month after each A&F (Month#1 v. Month#2/3) to evaluate the effect of A&F over time. Acceptability of A&F reports was evaluated using qualitative interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>8509 labor inductions were included (PRE = 4214, POST = 4295). A&F reports were successfully distributed every 3 months for the 2-year POST period. PRE to POST-implementation, fidelity to 4 of the 8 components increased significantly (cervical Foley utilization, latent labor examination frequency, amniotomy timing, and intrauterine pressure catheter utilization), without change in the other 4 components. For 2 of those 4 components where improvement was noted, there was no difference in fidelity by month after A&F report; rather, there was sustained improvement across the POST-implementation period. On the other hand, for the remaining 2 components, fidelity peaked in the first month after each A&F report, with some decline in the following 2 months prior to the next A&F report. Qualitative analysis (n = 24) supported A&F acceptability, with A&F described as \"motivating\" and \"helpful.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A&F was an effective implementation strategy to promote fidelity to certain components of this labor induction protocol. With some decline in effect after the first month POST-A&F report, increased A&F frequency should be considered in future work targeting obstetric outcomes, as well as health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11699657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00681-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Studies have demonstrated that standardizing labor induction (IOL), often with the use of protocols, may reduce racial inequities in obstetrics. IOL protocols are complex, multi-component interventions. To target identified implementation barriers, audit and feedback (A&F) was selected as an implementation strategy. Here, we aimed to understand the acceptability and effect of A&F on fidelity to this complex intervention through quantitative and qualitative approaches.

Methods: This secondary analysis of a type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (10/2018-12/2022) compared 2 years before (PRE) to 2 years after (POST) implementation of an IOL protocol at two sites. Fidelity to each of 8 specific protocol components was collected via chart review. During the POST period, unit-aggregated A&F reports were distributed via email every 3 months to site clinicians. Reports tracked fidelity to protocol components over time. For this analysis, we compared component fidelity PRE to POST-implementation. Additionally, during the POST period, we compared fidelity by month after each A&F (Month#1 v. Month#2/3) to evaluate the effect of A&F over time. Acceptability of A&F reports was evaluated using qualitative interviews.

Results: 8509 labor inductions were included (PRE = 4214, POST = 4295). A&F reports were successfully distributed every 3 months for the 2-year POST period. PRE to POST-implementation, fidelity to 4 of the 8 components increased significantly (cervical Foley utilization, latent labor examination frequency, amniotomy timing, and intrauterine pressure catheter utilization), without change in the other 4 components. For 2 of those 4 components where improvement was noted, there was no difference in fidelity by month after A&F report; rather, there was sustained improvement across the POST-implementation period. On the other hand, for the remaining 2 components, fidelity peaked in the first month after each A&F report, with some decline in the following 2 months prior to the next A&F report. Qualitative analysis (n = 24) supported A&F acceptability, with A&F described as "motivating" and "helpful."

Conclusions: A&F was an effective implementation strategy to promote fidelity to certain components of this labor induction protocol. With some decline in effect after the first month POST-A&F report, increased A&F frequency should be considered in future work targeting obstetric outcomes, as well as health inequities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审计和反馈是一种有效的实施策略,以提高对旨在减少产科不公平的多成分引产协议的保真度。
背景:研究表明,标准化引产(IOL),通常使用协议,可以减少产科的种族不平等。人工晶状体协议是复杂的,多组分干预。为了针对已确定的实施障碍,选择了审计和反馈(A&F)作为实施策略。在这里,我们旨在通过定量和定性的方法来了解A&F对这种复杂干预的可接受性及其对保真度的影响。方法:对一项I型混合有效性-实施试验(2018年10月至2022年12月)进行二次分析,比较两个地点实施IOL方案前2年(PRE)和后2年(POST)。通过图表审查收集8个特定协议组件的保真度。在POST期间,每3个月通过电子邮件将单位汇总的A&F报告分发给现场临床医生。报告跟踪了一段时间内协议组件的保真度。对于这个分析,我们比较了组件保真度PRE和post实现。此外,在POST期间,我们在每个A&F(第1个月vs .第2/3个月)之后按月比较保真度,以评估A&F随时间的影响。采用定性访谈对A&F报告的可接受性进行评估。结果:共纳入引产8509例(PRE = 4214, POST = 4295)。在两年的POST期间,A&F报告每3个月成功分发一次。实施前与实施后,8个指标中有4个指标的保真度显著增加(宫颈Foley利用率、潜在产程检查频率、羊膜切开时机和宫内压力导管的使用),其他4个指标无变化。对于这4个成分中的2个,在A&F报告后的一个月内,保真度没有差异;相反,整个执行后期间都有持续的改善。另一方面,对于剩下的两个组成部分,忠实度在每次A&F报告后的第一个月达到顶峰,在接下来的两个月里有所下降。定性分析(n = 24)支持A&F的可接受性,A&F被描述为“激励”和“有帮助”。结论:A&F是一种有效的实施策略,可以提高对引产方案某些部分的保真度。在报告后的第一个月,由于影响有所下降,在今后针对产科结果和卫生不平等的工作中,应考虑增加A&F频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the sustainability of a three-year community-based intergenerational project in Hong Kong: a longitudinal mixed methods study from the perspective of service providers. Implementing palliative care in intensive care units: assessing processes using the normalisation process theory NoMAD instrument. A mixed methods evaluation of mechanisms for facilitation in pediatric primary care. Adapting the HealthMpowerment (HMP) mobile application for youth living with or at risk of HIV in Africa using the ADAPT-ITT model. Development of implementation strategies for the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) pre-intubation checklist: a prospective, pre-implementation planning study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1