Optimizing patient selection for ECMO after pediatric hypothermic cardiac arrest.

Jack H Scaife, Hilary A Hewes, Stephanie E Iantorno, Christopher E Clinker, Stephen J Fenton, David E Skarda, Zachary J Kastenberg, Robert A Swendiman, Katie W Russell
{"title":"Optimizing patient selection for ECMO after pediatric hypothermic cardiac arrest.","authors":"Jack H Scaife, Hilary A Hewes, Stephanie E Iantorno, Christopher E Clinker, Stephen J Fenton, David E Skarda, Zachary J Kastenberg, Robert A Swendiman, Katie W Russell","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2004, our level 1 regional pediatric trauma center created a protocol to activate ECMO for children with suspected hypothermic cardiac arrest based on inclusion criteria: serum potassium ≤9, submersion <90 min, and core body temperature <30 °C. In 2017, Pasquier et al. developed a model to help predict the survival of adults after hypothermic cardiac arrest (HOPE score) that has not been validated in children. We sought to apply this score to our pediatric patient population to determine if it can optimize our patient selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review of all patients cannulated onto VA ECMO for hypothermic cardiac arrest between 2004 and 2022. We used abstracted data points to calculate the HOPE score for our patient population, both with and without presumed asphyxia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 19 years, 18 patients were cannulated for suspected hypothermic arrest, with three survivors (17 %). The HOPE score survival prediction ranged from 1 to 86 % with presumed asphyxia and 6-98 % without presumed asphyxia. Survivor HOPE scores ranged from 9 to 86 % with presumed asphyxia and 42-98 % without presumed asphyxia. Non-survivors' scores ranged 1-29 % with asphyxia and 6-57 % without asphyxia. A cutoff of >5 % predicted survival with asphyxia for ECMO could have decreased our cannulations by half without missing survivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECMO can be a lifesaving measure for specific children after hypothermic arrest. However, identifying the patients that will benefit from this resource-intensive intervention remains difficult. HOPE score utilization may decrease the rate of futile cannulation in children, but multi-centered research is needed in the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2004, our level 1 regional pediatric trauma center created a protocol to activate ECMO for children with suspected hypothermic cardiac arrest based on inclusion criteria: serum potassium ≤9, submersion <90 min, and core body temperature <30 °C. In 2017, Pasquier et al. developed a model to help predict the survival of adults after hypothermic cardiac arrest (HOPE score) that has not been validated in children. We sought to apply this score to our pediatric patient population to determine if it can optimize our patient selection.

Methods: This was a retrospective review of all patients cannulated onto VA ECMO for hypothermic cardiac arrest between 2004 and 2022. We used abstracted data points to calculate the HOPE score for our patient population, both with and without presumed asphyxia.

Results: Over 19 years, 18 patients were cannulated for suspected hypothermic arrest, with three survivors (17 %). The HOPE score survival prediction ranged from 1 to 86 % with presumed asphyxia and 6-98 % without presumed asphyxia. Survivor HOPE scores ranged from 9 to 86 % with presumed asphyxia and 42-98 % without presumed asphyxia. Non-survivors' scores ranged 1-29 % with asphyxia and 6-57 % without asphyxia. A cutoff of >5 % predicted survival with asphyxia for ECMO could have decreased our cannulations by half without missing survivors.

Conclusion: ECMO can be a lifesaving measure for specific children after hypothermic arrest. However, identifying the patients that will benefit from this resource-intensive intervention remains difficult. HOPE score utilization may decrease the rate of futile cannulation in children, but multi-centered research is needed in the pediatric population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化小儿低体温心脏骤停后 ECMO 患者的选择。
背景:2004 年,我们地区一级儿科创伤中心制定了一项协议,根据纳入标准(血清钾≤9,浸没方法)为疑似低体温心脏骤停的儿童启动 ECMO:这是对 2004 年至 2022 年期间因体温过低心脏骤停而插管至 VA ECMO 的所有患者的回顾性研究。我们使用摘录的数据点来计算患者群体的 HOPE 评分,包括假定窒息和未假定窒息的患者:结果:19 年间,18 名患者因疑似低体温骤停而插管,其中 3 人存活(17%)。根据 HOPE 评分预测的存活率,推测窒息患者的存活率为 1% 至 86%,未推测窒息患者的存活率为 6% 至 98%。幸存者的 HOPE 分数在 9% 到 86% 之间,其中有假定窒息,42% 到 98% 没有假定窒息。非幸存者的得分范围为 1-29% 有窒息,6-57% 无窒息。如果 ECMO 的预测存活率大于 5%,我们的插管量就会减少一半,而不会漏掉存活者:结论:对于低体温骤停后的特定儿童来说,ECMO 是一项挽救生命的措施。结论:ECMO 可以挽救低体温骤停后特定儿童的生命。然而,确定哪些患者将从这种资源密集型干预中获益仍然很困难。使用 HOPE 评分可降低儿童的无用插管率,但需要在儿童群体中开展多中心研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The value of current diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of fracture-related infections: Serum markers, histology, and cultures. Association of sociodemographic characteristics with the timeliness of surgery for patients with open tibial fractures. Does PIC score pick correctly? Evaluation of a modified-PIC based admission a single institution retrospective cohort study. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the elderly: 5-Year follow-up study. Assessing the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome during physical examination by measuring two-point discrimination: Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1