The association between clinically evaluated cognitive function and oral health in Norwegian older adults: The HUNT Study

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1111/jgs.19103
Marion Denos PhD, Ernest Obeng Asante MSc, Rannveig Sakshaug Eldholm MD, PhD, Geir Selbæk MD, PhD, Håvard Kjesbu Skjellegrind MD, PhD, Xiao-Mei Mai MD, PhD, Yue Chen MD, PhD, Yi-Qian Sun MD, PhD
{"title":"The association between clinically evaluated cognitive function and oral health in Norwegian older adults: The HUNT Study","authors":"Marion Denos PhD,&nbsp;Ernest Obeng Asante MSc,&nbsp;Rannveig Sakshaug Eldholm MD, PhD,&nbsp;Geir Selbæk MD, PhD,&nbsp;Håvard Kjesbu Skjellegrind MD, PhD,&nbsp;Xiao-Mei Mai MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yue Chen MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yi-Qian Sun MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Poor oral health and neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) are both important public health challenges in the general older population.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Older adults with NCDs may have poorer oral health due to decline in self-care, medication side effects, and lower dietary quality.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Yet, the association between cognitive function and oral health is unclear.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Wu et al. advocated a standardized assessment of oral health and cognitive states to better evaluate their potential associations.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore the relationship between cognitive function and oral health, both thoroughly assessed by clinical experts, in a home-dwelling Norwegian older adult population.</p><p>Our study population, derived from the Trøndelag Health Study Survey 4 (HUNT4), included 633 participants aged 70 years or older who attended both the HUNT4 Oral Health Study and HUNT4 70+.<span><sup>5-7</sup></span></p><p>Clinical experts assessed the cognitive function of HUNT4 70+ participants after a comprehensive clinical evaluation, following the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria.<span><sup>7</sup></span> In the current study, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia were diagnosed and collectively categorized as NCDs.</p><p>Participants in the HUNT4 Oral Health Study underwent clinical and radiographic examinations conducted by trained and calibrated dentists. Decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) were calculated using the clinical and radiographic caries registration of dental status.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Decayed teeth were caries lesions confined in dentine (grades 3–5), secondary caries in dentine, and root caries with cavitation. Severe periodontitis was defined as periodontal Stage 3 or 4 based on radiographic bone loss and periodontal stage assessments.<span><sup>6</sup></span></p><p>The relationships between cognitive function and the number of decayed teeth, DMFT or natural teeth were assessed using negative binomial regression models, computing ratios of means (RMs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The relationship between cognitive function and the prevalence of severe periodontitis was estimated using Poisson regression with robust error variance, providing prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% CIs. Covariates such as age, sex, education, marital status, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and alcohol consumption were considered potential confounders based on the literature.<span><sup>4, 8, 9</sup></span> All statistical analyses were performed with STATA/MP 18.</p><p>Table 1 describes the baseline characteristics of the study population overall and by cognitive function (normal and NCDs). As shown in Figure 1A, the mean number of decayed teeth was higher for participants with NCDs compared to those with normal cognitive function (1.8 vs. 1.5). NCDs were associated with a 19% increase in the mean number of decayed teeth in the adjusted model (RM 1.19, 95% CI 0.98–1.46), although it was not statistically significant (<i>p</i>-value = 0.09). It appears that a dose–response association was demonstrated (<i>p</i>-value for trend = 0.09): participants with MCI had an 18% increase (RM 1.18, 95% CI 0.95–1.47) in the mean number of decayed teeth, while those with dementia had a 25% increase (RM 1.25, 95% CI 0.84–1.86). There was no association between NCDs and the number of DMFT (Supplementary Table S1). Participants with dementia had a 9% decrease in the mean number of natural teeth compared to those with normal cognitive function (RM 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99, Supplementary Table S2). The prevalence of severe periodontitis was similar among participants with NCDs compared to those with normal cognitive function (Figure 1B: PR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85–1.21).</p><p>Few studies have explored the relationships between cognitive function and clinically measured oral health components. The available measures were often limited to self-rated oral health, questionnaires, or non-dental screening tool.<span><sup>4, 8, 10</sup></span> Our findings support the previous studies that reported an association between cognitive function and self-reported oral health.<span><sup>8, 10</sup></span> Our study, along with previous research,<span><sup>10</sup></span> suggests that poor cognitive function may lead to neglected self-care, resulting in poorer oral hygiene and oral health in older people.</p><p>The current study is one of the first to investigate potential associations between cognitive function and detailed oral health components, both clinically evaluated. NCDs were diagnosed by clinical experts, and oral health evaluation was thoroughly conducted by trained specialists in dentistry, which makes this study unique.<span><sup>5-7</sup></span> However, the sample size was small, leading to relatively imprecise estimates with wider 95% CIs.</p><p>In conclusion, our results suggested that older adults with NCDs had a higher number of dental caries than those with normal cognitive function, and participants with dementia had fewer natural teeth. This highlights the need to improve the oral health care of home-dwelling older adults with NCDs.</p><p>MD wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. XMM and YQS performed the literature search and contributed to the study design. GS, HKS, and YQS were responsible for data collection. MD, EOA, and YQS conducted statistical analyses and interpreted results. MD, EOA, RSE, GS, HKS, XMM, YC, and YQS participated in the data interpretation and the manuscript writing with important intellectual content and approved the final version.</p><p>The project was supported by the Dam Foundation (Project ID: 2021/FO347301) through the Norwegian Health Association. YQS was supported by a Research grant from The Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway (project ID 2018/42794).</p><p>There are no competing interests provided for any authors.</p><p>The sponsors had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.</p><p>The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (no. 31812). All HUNT participants have signed informed consent for participation and the use of data in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 11","pages":"3590-3593"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poor oral health and neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) are both important public health challenges in the general older population.1, 2 Older adults with NCDs may have poorer oral health due to decline in self-care, medication side effects, and lower dietary quality.3 Yet, the association between cognitive function and oral health is unclear.4 Wu et al. advocated a standardized assessment of oral health and cognitive states to better evaluate their potential associations.4

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore the relationship between cognitive function and oral health, both thoroughly assessed by clinical experts, in a home-dwelling Norwegian older adult population.

Our study population, derived from the Trøndelag Health Study Survey 4 (HUNT4), included 633 participants aged 70 years or older who attended both the HUNT4 Oral Health Study and HUNT4 70+.5-7

Clinical experts assessed the cognitive function of HUNT4 70+ participants after a comprehensive clinical evaluation, following the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria.7 In the current study, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia were diagnosed and collectively categorized as NCDs.

Participants in the HUNT4 Oral Health Study underwent clinical and radiographic examinations conducted by trained and calibrated dentists. Decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) were calculated using the clinical and radiographic caries registration of dental status.5 Decayed teeth were caries lesions confined in dentine (grades 3–5), secondary caries in dentine, and root caries with cavitation. Severe periodontitis was defined as periodontal Stage 3 or 4 based on radiographic bone loss and periodontal stage assessments.6

The relationships between cognitive function and the number of decayed teeth, DMFT or natural teeth were assessed using negative binomial regression models, computing ratios of means (RMs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The relationship between cognitive function and the prevalence of severe periodontitis was estimated using Poisson regression with robust error variance, providing prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% CIs. Covariates such as age, sex, education, marital status, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and alcohol consumption were considered potential confounders based on the literature.4, 8, 9 All statistical analyses were performed with STATA/MP 18.

Table 1 describes the baseline characteristics of the study population overall and by cognitive function (normal and NCDs). As shown in Figure 1A, the mean number of decayed teeth was higher for participants with NCDs compared to those with normal cognitive function (1.8 vs. 1.5). NCDs were associated with a 19% increase in the mean number of decayed teeth in the adjusted model (RM 1.19, 95% CI 0.98–1.46), although it was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.09). It appears that a dose–response association was demonstrated (p-value for trend = 0.09): participants with MCI had an 18% increase (RM 1.18, 95% CI 0.95–1.47) in the mean number of decayed teeth, while those with dementia had a 25% increase (RM 1.25, 95% CI 0.84–1.86). There was no association between NCDs and the number of DMFT (Supplementary Table S1). Participants with dementia had a 9% decrease in the mean number of natural teeth compared to those with normal cognitive function (RM 0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.99, Supplementary Table S2). The prevalence of severe periodontitis was similar among participants with NCDs compared to those with normal cognitive function (Figure 1B: PR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85–1.21).

Few studies have explored the relationships between cognitive function and clinically measured oral health components. The available measures were often limited to self-rated oral health, questionnaires, or non-dental screening tool.4, 8, 10 Our findings support the previous studies that reported an association between cognitive function and self-reported oral health.8, 10 Our study, along with previous research,10 suggests that poor cognitive function may lead to neglected self-care, resulting in poorer oral hygiene and oral health in older people.

The current study is one of the first to investigate potential associations between cognitive function and detailed oral health components, both clinically evaluated. NCDs were diagnosed by clinical experts, and oral health evaluation was thoroughly conducted by trained specialists in dentistry, which makes this study unique.5-7 However, the sample size was small, leading to relatively imprecise estimates with wider 95% CIs.

In conclusion, our results suggested that older adults with NCDs had a higher number of dental caries than those with normal cognitive function, and participants with dementia had fewer natural teeth. This highlights the need to improve the oral health care of home-dwelling older adults with NCDs.

MD wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. XMM and YQS performed the literature search and contributed to the study design. GS, HKS, and YQS were responsible for data collection. MD, EOA, and YQS conducted statistical analyses and interpreted results. MD, EOA, RSE, GS, HKS, XMM, YC, and YQS participated in the data interpretation and the manuscript writing with important intellectual content and approved the final version.

The project was supported by the Dam Foundation (Project ID: 2021/FO347301) through the Norwegian Health Association. YQS was supported by a Research grant from The Liaison Committee for Education, Research and Innovation in Central Norway (project ID 2018/42794).

There are no competing interests provided for any authors.

The sponsors had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (no. 31812). All HUNT participants have signed informed consent for participation and the use of data in research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
挪威老年人经临床评估的认知功能与口腔健康之间的关系:HUNT 研究。
口腔健康状况不佳和神经认知障碍(NCDs)都是普通老年人群面临的重要公共卫生挑战。1, 2 患有 NCDs 的老年人由于自我护理能力下降、药物副作用和饮食质量降低,口腔健康状况可能较差。这项横断面研究的目的是探讨认知功能和口腔健康之间的关系,两者均由临床专家对居家的挪威老年人群进行全面评估。我们的研究人群来自特伦德拉格健康研究调查4(HUNT4),包括633名70岁或70岁以上的参与者,他们同时参加了HUNT4口腔健康研究和HUNT4 70+研究。5-7 临床专家按照《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第五版》(DSM-5)的标准,在对 HUNT4 70+ 参与者进行全面临床评估后,对其认知功能进行了评估。在当前的研究中,轻度认知障碍 (MCI) 和痴呆症被诊断并统称为非传染性疾病。HUNT4 口腔健康研究的参与者接受了由经过培训和校准的牙医进行的临床和放射检查。蛀牙是指局限于牙本质的龋齿(3-5 级)、牙本质的继发性龋齿和有龋洞的根部龋齿。6 认知功能与龋齿、DMFT 或天然牙齿数量之间的关系采用负二项回归模型进行评估,计算出均值比(RMs)和 95% 置信区间(CIs)。认知功能与重度牙周炎患病率之间的关系采用带有稳健误差方差的泊松回归进行估算,得出患病率比(PRs)及 95% 置信区间(CIs)。年龄、性别、教育程度、婚姻状况、体重指数 (BMI)、吸烟状况和饮酒量等协变量被认为是基于文献的潜在混杂因素。如图 1A 所示,与认知功能正常者相比,NCD 患者的平均蛀牙数量更高(1.8 对 1.5)。在调整模型中,NCD 与蛀牙平均数量增加 19% 相关(RM 1.19,95% CI 0.98-1.46),但在统计学上并不显著(P 值 = 0.09)。似乎存在剂量-反应关系(趋势的 p 值 = 0.09):患有 MCI 的参与者的平均蛀牙数量增加了 18%(RM 1.18,95% CI 0.95-1.47),而患有痴呆症的参与者的平均蛀牙数量增加了 25%(RM 1.25,95% CI 0.84-1.86)。非传染性疾病与 DMFT 数量之间没有关联(补充表 S1)。与认知功能正常者相比,痴呆症患者的平均天然牙齿数量减少了 9%(RM 0.91,95% CI 0.84-0.99,补充表 S2)。与认知功能正常者相比,患有非传染性疾病的参与者中严重牙周炎的患病率相似(图 1B:PR 1.02,95% CI 0.85-1.21)。我们的研究结果支持了之前报道认知功能与自我报告口腔健康之间存在关联的研究。8、10 我们的研究以及之前的研究10 表明,认知功能低下可能会导致自我护理被忽视,从而导致老年人口腔卫生和口腔健康状况不佳。非传染性疾病由临床专家诊断,而口腔健康评估则由受过培训的牙科专家全面进行,这使得本研究具有独特性。5-7 然而,样本量较小,导致估计值相对不精确,95% CI 较宽。总之,我们的研究结果表明,患有非传染性疾病的老年人比认知功能正常的老年人有更多的龋齿,患有痴呆症的参与者有更少的天然牙齿。这凸显了改善患有非传染性疾病的居家老年人口腔保健的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
期刊最新文献
Notices Issue Information Cover Issue Information Author Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1